In recent years, a large amount of data has been accumulated on the relationship between cognitive impairment, dementia and diabetes mellitus. This article presents an overview of modern literature, including the definition of cognitive functions, the modern classification of cognitive impairment, pathogenetic mechanisms of diabetes mellitus influence on the development of cognitive impairment and dementia (neurogenesis, integrity of the blood-brain barrier, systemic inflammatory reactions, hyper- and hypoglycemia, insulin resistance, vascular dysfunction of the microvasculature and increase in glucocorticosteroids). The influence of anti-diabetic medications on cognitive functions has been examined in detail: insulin preparations, oral hypoglycemic agents of the biguanide group (metformin), thiazolidinediones (rosiglitazone and pioglitazone), sulfonylurea derivatives (glycazide, glipizide), a-glucosidase (acarbose) inhibitors, incretin-directed therapy (receptor agonists glucan-like peptide (exenatide and liraglutide) and inhibitors of dipeptidylpeptidase type 4 (sitagliptin, vildagliptin and alogliptin)), sodium glucose inhibitors cotransporter type 2. The data demonstrating a multidirectional effect on the cognitive functions of various antidiabetic drugs is presented, the possible influence on the rate of progression of cognitive impairment and the risk of dementia of intensive control of plasma glucose level in comparison with the standard decrease in patients with type 2 diabetes is analyzed.

One type of non-allergic non-infectious rhinitis is represented by a heterogeneous group of rhinitis medicamentosa, which can be divided into several pathogenetic types. The most common rebound nasal congestion associated with the use of topical decongestants. Excessive use of intranasal decongestants leads to a decrease in the number of alpha-adrenoreceptors on the surface of cell membranes and uncoupling their connection with the G-protein and the development of tachyphylaxis. To prevent the development of rebound nasal congestion caused by topical decongestants, it is important to limit the frequency of their use. In most cases, the duration of the use of vasoconstrictor drugs should be limited to 5-7 days, according to Patient information leaflets for the drugs. However, in patients who have had a history of episodes of rebound nasal congestion, which develops including the previously indicated periods, the duration of decongestant therapy should be limited to 3 days. Rhinitis associated with local inflammation is caused by the intake of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Currently, the so-called "aspirin triad" is well known - a combination of bronchial asthma, rhinosinusitis (often polyposis) and intolerance to ASA. Neurogenic rhinitis develops due to the use of drugs that violate vascular tone, for example, antihypertensive drugs or type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Drug-induced rhinitis has a significant impact on the patient's quality of life: nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, secondary night apnea, insomnia as a result of nasal breathing disturbances, headaches, irritability, weakness after sleepless nights disturb patients to a large extent. Timely diagnosis and withdrawal of a provocative drug, the use of topical corticosteroids in case of severe rhinitis are the basis of the treatment of rhinitis medicamentosa. In severe cases, there is a need, including surgical treatment, such as, for example, submucosal laser destruction of the lower nasal concha.

The ability of drugs to have an ototoxic effect has been studied for a long time, however, the true prevalence of this undesirable phenomenon is unknown, which is due to the use of various audiological protocols, a wide range of reactions to drugs in different ethnic groups, and most importantly, the lack of caution with regard to otological symptoms due to their reversibility or lack of immediate threat to life. Drug-induced ototoxicity is a functional disorder of the inner ear (cochlea and/or vestibular apparatus) or eighth pair of cranial nerves. Pharmacotherapy, associated with the development of ototoxic drug reactions, may remain undervalued for a long time, often until irreversible hearing impairment is formed. The most frequently prescribed drugs that cause ototoxic phenomena include anticancer drugs, antibacterial drugs of the aminoglycoside group, loop diuretics, calcium channel blockers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antimalarial drugs, salicylates, etc. Monitoring the degree of hearing impairment before and during therapy is important in preventing the development of drug-induced ototoxicity and makes it possible to consider alternative treatment regimens in a timely manner. It is in this connection that the role of participation in the appointment of rational pharmacotherapy to patients with a potential risk of developing otological phenomena of a clinical pharmacologist and audiologist undoubtedly increases.

The efficacy of the antihypertensive therapy may be related to genetic factors that can influence not only the degree of the blood pressure (BP) elevation but also contribute to the interindividual variability of response to the antihypertensive treatment.The aim of the work was to study pharmacodynamic parameters of the therapy efficacy with angiotensin II receptor blockers in the form of monotherapy and as part of combined drugs in patients with the arterial hypertension depending on the genetic features of patients – polymorphism of the gene encoding angiotensin-converting enzyme, or I/D-polymorphism.Materials and methods. The study included 179 patients of the Moscow region with a first-diagnosed arterial hypertension (AH) of 1–2 degree, including 141 (78.8%) women and 38 (21.2%) men aged from 32 to 69 years. By a simple randomization method, the patients were randomly allocated into groups receiving irbesartan and valsartan as mono- or combination therapy with hydrochlorthiazide. After 3 weeks of this pharmacotherapy, the presence of rs4646994 Alu Ins / Del genetic polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene and the minimum equilibrium concentration of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) were determined.Results. The patients treated with irbesartan, the D/D genotype carriers, were significantly less likely to reach the target BP and more likely to require a pharmacotherapy intensification compared to I/D heterozygotes (p=0.042 and p=0.058, respectively) and I/I homozygotes (p=0.011 and p=0.011, respectively). The patients treated with valsartan, the D/D genotype carriers, significantly more often reached the target BP and significantly less often required a pharmacotherapy intensification than the I/D genotype carriers (p=0.05 and p=0.05, respectively). Herewith, at the end of the study, according to the results of the office BP measurements and daily BP monitoring, the target BP achievement was not significantly correlated with the I/D polymorphism of the ACE gene.Conclusion. When personalizing the AH therapy in patients of the Moscow region, the genotype I/I carriers by I/D polymorphism of the ACE gene, can be recommended irbesartan in the form of mono- or bicomponent therapy as a starting therapy of ARBs; the D/D genotype carriers can be recommended valsartan. A more pronounced decrease in the daytime systolic BP (SBP), the daytime diastolic BP (DBP) and the nighttime SBP variabilities in the valsartan group of patients, the D allele carriers may indicate a more persistent effect of the antihypertensive therapy.

The polypharmacy as the reason of iatrogeny is topical problem of health care both in Russia and in the world. Clinical aspects of polypharmacy come out as pharmacotherapy efficiency decrease and development of severe adverse drug effects as well as health care cost increase. There is no uniform definition of polypharmacy in pediatric practice. However quantity and duration of medicine administration, medicine class, medicine eligibility, medical conditions and clinical conditions are usually considered. The correlations between existing medicines prescription models and health problems in children appears relevant. The results of recent researches on this problem are presented in the review.

Glaucoma is seen as a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by optical neuropathy with associated visual field loss; one of the main risk factors for its development is increased intraocular pressure (IOP). In the case of drug-induced glaucoma (DIG), patients develop elevated IOP, optic neuropathy and visual field defects associated with the use of certain drugs. Corticosteroids are one of the most well-known classes of drugs that can cause an increase in IOP through the open-angle mechanism. Drug-induced glaucoma, which develops similarly to open-angle glaucoma, can also be caused by some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, antibodies to the endothelial growth factor, etc. Classes of drugs that can cause angle-closure glaucoma include topical anticholinergic or sympathomimetic drops, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, antihistamines, antiparkinsonian drugs, antipsychotic drugs, antispasmodics. Products containing sulfa group drugs can cause DIG due to a different closing angle mechanism involving a forward rotation of the ciliary body. It is important for medical practitioners to be aware of this unwanted drug reaction in order to prevent, detect and treat DIG. In the case of drug-induced increase in IOP, if the underlying disease allows discontinuation of drugs, this measure usually leads to normalization of IOP. In cases when the patient's IOP does not normalize after discontinuation of steroids or when they must continue to take corticosteroids, the administration of topical drugs for the treatment of glaucoma should be considered.