J. Brian Jordon

Prof. J. Brian Jordon

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Alabama, Box 870276, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 April 2020 in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DAD. Z. Avery
D. Z. Avery
BPB. J. Phillips
B. J. Phillips
CMC. J. T. Mason
C. J. T. Mason
MPM. Palermo
M. Palermo
MWM. B. Williams
M. B. Williams
J. Brian JordonJ. Brian Jordon
J. Brian Jordon

1 August 2020 in Materials & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
J. Brian JordonJ. Brian Jordon
J. Brian Jordon
PAP.G. Allison
P.G. Allison
BPB.J. Phillips
B.J. Phillips
DAD.Z. Avery
D.Z. Avery
RKR.P. Kinser
R.P. Kinser
KDK. Doherty
K. Doherty

30 October 2021 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MWMalcolm Brady Williams
Malcolm Brady Williams
TRThomas W Robinson
Thomas W Robinson
CWChristopher Jacob Williamson
Christopher Jacob Williamson
RKR. P. Kinser
R. P. Kinser
NAN. A. Ashmore
N. A. Ashmore
J. Brian JordonJ. Brian Jordon
J. Brian Jordon
In this work, the effect of processing parameters on the resulting microstructure and mechanical properties of magnesium alloy WE43 processed via Additive Friction Stir Deposition (AFSD), a nascent solid-state additive manufacturing (AM) process, is investigated. In particular, a parameterization study was carried out, using multiple four-layer deposits, to identify a suitable process window for a structural 68-layers bulk WE43 deposition. The parametric study identified an acceptable set of parameters with minimal surface defects and excellent consolidation for the fabrication of a bulk WE43 deposition. Microstructural, tensile, and fatigue life characterization was conducted on the bulk WE43 deposition and compared to commercially available wrought material to elucidate the process-structure-property-performance (PSPP) relationship of the AFSD process. This study shows that the bulk WE43 deposit exhibited a refined homogenous microstructure and a texture shift relative to the wrought material. However, a reduction in hardness and tensile behavior was observed in the as-deposited WE43 compared to the wrought control. Additionally, fatigue specimens extracted from the bulk deposition exhibited a decrease in life in the low-cycle regime but performed comparably to the wrought plate in the high-cycle regime. The outcomes of this study illustrate the potential of the AFSD process in additively manufactured structural load-bearing components made with magnesium alloy WE43 in the as-built condition.

10 February 2022 in Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DAD. Z. Avery
D. Z. Avery
CCC. E. Cleek
C. E. Cleek
BPBrandon Phillips
Brandon Phillips
MRM. Y. Rekha
M. Y. Rekha
RKR. P. Kinser
R. P. Kinser
J. Brian JordonJ. Brian Jordon
J. Brian Jordon
A novel solid-state additive manufacturing (AM) process, additive friction stir deposition (AFS-D), provides a new pathway for additively repairing damaged nonweldable aerospace materials that are susceptible to induced thermal gradients within the microstructure. In this work, we quantify the microstructural evolution and mechanical performance of an additively repaired AA7075-T651 (Al-Zn-Mg-Cu) via the AFS-D process. To evaluate the AFS-D process for repairing high strength aluminum alloys, the AFS-D technique was used to additively fill a linear groove that was machined into an AA7075-T651 plate. After repairing the plate with the AFS-D process, the repaired plate was subjected to standard T6 heat treatment. The results of this study show that the heat-treated AFS-D repair did not exhibit any significant grain growth and demonstrated an increase in the average Vickers hardness in the repair compared with the wrought 7075-T651 control. Tensile and fatigue behavior was investigated for heat-treated repair and compared with the wrought AA7075-T651 control. The heat-treated repair exhibited wrought-like tensile properties for yield stress (YS) and ultimate stress; however, the heat-treated repair had significant scatter in the elongation to failure. Additionally, the mean fatigue behavior of the heat-treated repairs displayed a reduction in cycles to failure compared with the wrought control. Lastly, a microstructure-sensitive fatigue life model was used to elucidate process-structure-property fatigue mechanism relations of the heat-treated repair and wrought AA7075.

14 July 2020 in Metals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BRBen A. Rutherford
Ben A. Rutherford
DADustin Z. Avery
Dustin Z. Avery
BPBrandon J. Phillips
Brandon J. Phillips
HRHarish Rao
Harish Rao
KDKevin J. Doherty
Kevin J. Doherty
J. Brian JordonJ. Brian Jordon
J. Brian Jordon
This work presents, for the first time, an in-depth investigation of the structure–property–fatigue relationships of an Al-Mg-Si alloy (AA6061) processed via additive friction stir-deposition (AFS-D). As industry focus continues to shift for more efficient and lightweight structures, quantitative studies on the cyclic performance of additively manufactured materials are needed. In this study, the AFS-D processed AA6061-T6 was machined into specimens in two orthogonal orientations and subjected to monotonic and strain-controlled fatigue testing. The microstructural features of as-deposited AA6061 exhibited evidence of dynamic recrystallization and grain refinement. In addition, significant reduction in the intermetallic particles was observed after AFS-D processing. The fatigue results demonstrate that the as-deposited material, particularly the longitudinal direction, exhibited similar fatigue performance to wrought AA6061-T6 in both low-cycle and high-cycle fatigue regimes, which is a promising result for additively manufactured material in the as-deposited condition. By contrast, the as-deposited build direction orientation possessed slightly lower fatigue resistance than the wrought feedstock material. The AFS-D material was observed to exhibit different damage mechanisms from porosity-based damage mechanisms observed in fusion-based additively manufactured materials. Lastly, a microstructure-sensitive fatigue model was employed to capture the fatigue effects of the AFS-D processing on the AA6061.

8 November 2021 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBrandon Phillips
Brandon Phillips
CWChristopher Jacob Williamson
Christopher Jacob Williamson
RKR. P. Kinser
R. P. Kinser
J. Brian JordonJ. Brian Jordon
J. Brian Jordon
KDKevin J. Doherty
Kevin J. Doherty
Paul G. AllisonPaul G. Allison
Paul G. Allison
Additive Friction Stir-Deposition (AFS-D) is a transformative, metallic additive manufacturing (AM) process capable of producing near-net shape components with a wide variety of material systems. The solid-state nature of the process permits many of these materials to be successfully deposited without the deleterious phase and thermally activated defects commonly observed in other metallic AM technologies. This work is the first to investigate the as-deposited microstructure and mechanical performance of a free-standing AA5083 deposition. An initial process parameterization was conducted to down-select optimal parameters for a large deposition to examine build direction properties. Microscopy revealed that constitutive particles were dispersed evenly throughout the matrix when compared to the rolled feedstock. Electron backscatter diffraction revealed a significant grain refinement from the inherent dynamic recrystallization from the AFS-D process. Tensile experiments determined a drop in yield strength, but an improvement in tensile strength in the longitudinal direction. However, a substantial reduction in tensile strength was observed in the build direction of the structure. Subsequent fractographic analysis revealed that the recommended lubrication applied to the feedstock rods, necessary for successful depositions via AFS-D, was ineffectively dispersed into the structure. As a result, lubrication contamination became entrapped at layer boundaries, preventing adequate bonding between layers.