This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of adding melatonin to the treatment protocol of hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) patients. This was an open‐label, randomized controlled clinical trial in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients. Patients were randomized into a treatment arm receiving melatonin plus standard care or a control arm receiving standard care alone. The trial's primary endpoint was sleep quality examined by the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ). The trial's secondary endpoints were symptoms alleviation by Day 7, intensive care unit admission, 10‐day mortality, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, C‐reactive protein status, and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation. Ninety‐six patients were recruited and allocated to either the melatonin arm (n = 48) or control arm (n = 48). Baseline characteristics were similar across treatment arms. There was no significant difference in symptoms on Day 7. The mean of the LSEQ scores was significantly higher in the melatonin group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in laboratory data, except for blood oxygen saturation, which has improved significantly in the melatonin group compared with the control group (95.81% vs. 93.65% respectively, p = 0.003). This clinical trial study showed that the combination of oral melatonin tablets and standard treatment could substantially improve sleep quality and blood oxygen saturation in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients.

Introduction: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are considered the drugs, whose effectiveness in viral pandemics has been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate of adding fluoxetine to the treatment regimen of patients with COVID‐19 pneumonia.Methods: This study was a double‐blind randomized placebo controlled clinical trial .36 patients in the fluoxetine and 36 patients in the placebo group were enrolled. Patients in the intervention group were first treated with fluoxetine 10 mg for 4 days and then the dose of 20 mg was continued for 4 weeks. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS V. 22.0.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinical symptoms at the beginning of the study and also the score of anxiety and depression, oxygen saturation at the time of hospitalization, mid‐hospitalization and discharge periods. The need for mechanical ventilator support (p = 1.00), the need for admission in the intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 1.00), rate for mortality (p = 1.00), and discharge with relative recovery (p = 1.00) were not significantly different between the two groups. The distribution of CRP within the study groups showed a significant decrease during different time periods (p = 0.001), and although there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups on the first day (p = 1.00) and at discharge (p = 0.585), mid‐hospital CRP showed a significant decrease in the fluoxetine group (p = 0.032).Conclusion: Fluoxetine resulted in a faster reduction of patients' inflammation without association with depression and anxiety.

Introduction: Montelukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist that helps treat chronic asthma and allergic rhinitis by reducing inflammation and bronchoconstriction. However, oral montelukast’s effectiveness in managing acute asthma attacks has yet to be completely identified. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy of oral montelukast in acute exacerbations of asthma. Seventy patients between 18 and 65 years of age with a primary diagnosis of asthma attack were included in the study and were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg of montelukast orally daily or placebo. Symptoms, signs, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were evaluated. Results: Our findings showed a statistically significant difference between montelukast and placebo regarding FEV₁ (78.05 ± 7.84 vs. 72.05 ± 12.00, P = 0.016), PEFR (322.86 ± 28.95 vs. 290.86 ± 44.21, P = 0.003), and wheezing (P = 0.022) on the fifth day of treatment. Additionally, FEV₁ and PEFR values were compared in two subgroups of patients, ICS users (ICSU) and non-ICS users (NICSU), in both the montelukast and placebo groups. In the montelukast group, while PEFR improved significantly for day 5 in both the ICSU (P = 0.007) and NICSU (P = 0.027) subgroups, FEV₁ only improved in the ICSU (P = 0.009) subgroup compared to placebo. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that oral montelukast administered in acute asthma exacerbation could lead to better values of PEFR and FEV₁ on pulmonary function and improvement of wheezing in terms of symptoms.

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with COPD. The contribution of IHD to acute outcomes in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is not known in detail. The present study assessed the effect of comorbid IHD on length of stay (LOS), risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and death as indicators of the short-term outcomes for patients hospitalized for AECOPD. Medical records of patients hospitalized for AECOPD from September 2008 to March 2014 were reviewed. Data extracted from patient records regarding the presence of comorbidities and the markers of disease severity were analyzed using logistic regression for ICU admission and mortality, the Kaplan-Meier method, log rank test and Cox regression for LOS. Of 507 separate admissions, 146 episodes (28.8%) occurred in patients with IHD. The median LOS was 7 days [interquartile range (IQR) 6, 11] in patients with IHD versus 6 days (IQR 5, 8) for patients without IHD. After adjustment for confounders, LOS was found to be 26% longer (p=0.033) for patients with IHD. The adjusted odds ratio for the risk of ICU admission and death in patients with IHD was 2.97 and 3.86, respectively. Patients hospitalized for AECOPD with comorbid IHD had longer LOS, greater risk for ICU admission and death. It seems that this group is a particular COPD subtype with a more severe degree of COPD and poorer acute outcomes that may influence optimal management.

Background. Lophomonas blattarum is an emerging protozoan agent that mainly infects the lower respiratory system, causing pulmonary lophomoniasis. The bronchoscopic findings in patients with pulmonary lophomoniasis have not been investigated yet. Accordingly, we assess the bronchoscopic findings of lophomoniasis in patients suffering from pulmonary lophomoniasis through a registry-based clinical study. Methods. In this retrospective study, of 480 patient candidates for bronchoscopy, 50 Lophomonas-positive patients were enrolled. Demographic data, relevant characteristics, and bronchoscopy findings of the patients were recorded and analyzed. Results. Overall, 50 (male=32, female=18) patients with an average age of 61.8±13.3 years were examined. Nineteen patients (38) had normal bronchoscopic findings, and 31 patients (62) had abnormal bronchoscopic findings. According to the severity index, most (52) of patients had mild severity, followed by moderate (30) and severe (18) cases. The highest involvement was in the right lung bronchus (46), and the lowest was in the carina (8). Furthermore, purulent and mucosal secretions in the right and left lung bronchus were the most abnormalities found in different anatomical locations. Conclusion. For the first time, the current study demonstrated that pulmonary lophomoniasis does not have pathognomonic bronchoscopic findings. However, each suspected patient must be checked for lophomoniasis, even with normal bronchoscopic findings, particularly in endemic areas.

Diagnosing chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms, variable radiological findings, and limited mycological evidences. While galactomannan (GM) testing has been validated in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), its usefulness in sputum samples for CPA remains unclear. This study aimed to determine an appropriate GM cut-off level in sputum samples and its performance in diagnosis of CPA. The diagnostic performance of sputum GM was evaluated in patients with COPD suspected of having CPA referred to the two reference centers for pulmonary diseases in Iran, and compared against established diagnostic criteria, including Aspergillus culture and IgG antibody tests. The sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value for sputum GM test were calculated. The optimal cut-off for sputum GM was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Of 196 COPD patients, 189 were analyzed for sputum GM. Sputum GM demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83 (with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of 0.748 - 0.913 and a p-value < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value for the sputum GM index was 1.44. The sensitivity and specificity were found to be 83.3 % and 74.2 % respectively. The median (IQR) levels of sputum GM index were significantly higher in CPA patients compared to non-CPA patients. (Pv <0.001). Overall, our findings suggest that sputum GM is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of CPA; however, further prospective validation is warranted to increase its clinical utility.