The acute phase response is an orchestrated response to tissue injury, infection or inflammation. A prominent feature of this response is the induction of acute phase proteins, which are involved in the restoration of homeostasis. Cytokines are important mediators of the acute phase response. Uncontrolled and prolonged action of cytokines is potentially harmful, therefore mechanisms exist which limit the activity of cytokines; these include soluble cytokine receptors and receptor antagonists. The cytokine signal is transmitted into the cell via membrane‐bound receptors. Different intracellular signalling pathways are activated by different cytokine‐receptor interactions. Eventually, cytokine‐inducible transcription factors interact with their response elements in the promotor region of acute phase genes and transcription is induced. Systemic inflammation results in a systemic acute phase response. However, local inflammatory or injurious processes in the liver may also induce an acute phase response, for example after partial hepatectomy and during hepatic fibrosis. The acute phase proteins induced in these conditions probably act to limit proteolytic and/or fibrogenic activity and tissue damage. The possible function of the acute phase protein α2‐macroglobulin in hepatic fibrosis is discussed in some detail. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Oxidative stress (OxS) is considered a major factor in the pathophysiology of inflammatory chronic liver diseases, including non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD). Chronic impairment of lipid metabolism is closely related to alterations of the oxidant/antioxidant balance, which affect metabolism-related organelles, leading to cellular lipotoxicity, lipid peroxidation, chronic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Increased OxS also triggers hepatocytes stress pathways, leading to inflammation and fibrogenesis, contributing to the progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The antioxidant response, regulated by the Nrf2/ARE pathway, is a key component in this process and counteracts oxidative stress-induced damage, contributing to the restoration of normal lipid metabolism. Therefore, modulation of the antioxidant response emerges as an interesting target to prevent NAFLD development and progression. This review highlights the link between disturbed lipid metabolism and oxidative stress in the context of NAFLD. In addition, emerging potential therapies based on antioxidant effects and their likely molecular targets are discussed.

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), characterized as excess lipid accumulation in the liver which is not due to alcohol use, has emerged as one of the major health problems around the world. The dysregulated lipid metabolism creates a lipotoxic environment which promotes the development of NAFLD, especially the progression from simple steatosis (NAFL) to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).Purposeand Aim: This review focuses on the mechanisms of lipid accumulation in the liver, with an emphasis on the metabolic fate of free fatty acids (FFAs) in NAFLD and presents an update on the relevant cellular processes/mechanisms that are involved in lipotoxicity. The changes in the levels of various lipid species that result from the imbalance between lipolysis/lipid uptake/lipogenesis and lipid oxidation/secretion can cause organellar dysfunction, e.g. ER stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, lysosomal dysfunction, JNK activation, secretion of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and aggravate (or be exacerbated by) hypoxia which ultimately lead to cell death. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of how abnormal lipid metabolism leads to lipotoxicity and the cellular mechanisms of lipotoxicity in the context of NAFLD.

Endotoxin–induced cholestasis is mainly caused by an impaired canalicular secretion. Mrp2, the canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter, is strongly down–regulated in this situation, and canalicular bile salt secretion is also reduced. We hypothesized that other adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette (ABC) transporters may compensate for the decreased transport activity to protect the cell from cytokine–induced oxidative damage. Therefore, we examined the expression of ABC–transport proteins in membrane fractions of whole liver and of isolated hepatocytes of endotoxin–treated rats and performed reverse–transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) on mRNA isolated from these livers. In addition, the localization of these transporters was examined using confocal scanning laser microscopy. By 6 hours after endotoxin administration, we found a clear increase of mrp1 mRNA and protein, whereas mrp2 mRNA and protein were decreased. This was confirmed in isolated hepatocytes. In addition,mdr1bmRNA was strongly increased, whereasmdr1aandmdr2mRNA did not change significantly. Both the mRNA and protein levels of the sister of P–glycoprotein (spgp), the recently cloned bile salt transporter, decreased. After endotoxin treatment, the normally sharply delineated canalicular staining of mrp2 and spgp had changed to a fuzzy pattern, suggesting localization in a subapical compartment. We conclude that endotoxin–induced cholestasis is caused by decreased mrp2 and spgp levels, as well as an abnormal localization of these proteins. The simultaneous up–regulation of mrp1 and mdr1b may confer resistance to hepatocytes against cytokine–induced metabolic stress.