Jaime Nieto

Dr. Jaime Nieto

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 February 2020 in Energy & Environmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ICIñigo Capellán-Pérez
Iñigo Capellán-Pérez
IBIgnacio de Blas
Ignacio de Blas
JNJaime Nieto
Jaime Nieto
CCCarlos de Castro
Carlos de Castro
LMLuis Javier Miguel
Luis Javier Miguel
DADavid Alvarez-Antelo
David Alvarez-Antelo
Description of the open-source MEDEAS integrated assessment modeling framework, which focuses on the biophysical and economic dimensions, restrictions and interactions arising during energy transitions.

1 April 2018 in Ecological Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JNJaime Nieto
Jaime Nieto
ÓCÓscar Carpintero
Óscar Carpintero
LMLuis J. Miguel
Luis J. Miguel

30 December 2022 in Journal of Industrial Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JNJaime Nieto
Jaime Nieto
PMPedro B. Moyano
Pedro B. Moyano
DMDiego Moyano
Diego Moyano
LMLuis Javier Miguel
Luis Javier Miguel
Input–output tables (IOTs) provide a relevant picture of economic structure as they represent the composition and interindustry relationships of an economy. The technical coefficients matrix (A matrix) is considered to capture the technological status of an economy; so, it is of special relevance for the evaluation of long‐term, structural transformations, such as sustainability transitions in integrated assessment models (IAMs). The A matrix has typically been considered either static or exogenous. Endogenous structural change has rarely been applied to models. The objective of this paper is to analyze energy intensity, a widely used variable in IAMs, and its role as a driver of structural change. We therefore identify the most relevant technical coefficients in the IOTs time series and estimate an econometric model based on the energy intensity of five different final end‐use energy sources. The results of this analysis show that energy intensity has a significant influence on the evolution of the A matrix and should therefore be taken into consideration when analyzing endogenous structural change in models.

1 November 2021 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JNJaime Nieto
Jaime Nieto
HPHector Pollitt
Hector Pollitt
Paul BrockwayPaul Brockway
Paul Brockway
LCLucy Clements
Lucy Clements
Marco SakaiMarco Sakai
Marco Sakai
JBJohn Barrett
John Barrett

1 June 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJoão Santos
João Santos
MVMiguel Viana
Miguel Viana
JNJaime Nieto
Jaime Nieto
Paul BrockwayPaul Brockway
Paul Brockway
Marco SakaiMarco Sakai
Marco Sakai
Tiago  DomingosTiago Domingos
Tiago Domingos
The benefits of energy efficiency are recognized in multiple socio-economic spheres. Still, the quantitative impact on macroeconomic performance is not fully understood, as modeling tools are not thermodynamically consistent—failing to explicitly include the useful stage of energy flows and/or thermodynamic efficiencies in primary–final–useful energy transformations. Misspecification in the link between energy use and the economy underplays the role of energy use and efficiency in economic growth. In this work, we develop and implement the Macroeconometric Resource Consumption model for Portugal (MARCO-PT), 1960–2014. Based on the post-Keynesian framework developed for the United Kingdom (MARCO-UK), our model explicitly includes thermodynamic energy efficiency, extending the analysis to the useful stage of energy flows. The model’s stochastic equations are econometrically estimated. The historical influence of key variables—namely thermodynamic energy efficiency—on economic output is assessed through counterfactual simulations and computation of year-by-year output elasticities. The MARCO-PT model adequately describes the historical behavior of endogenous variables. Although its influence has decreased over time, thermodynamic efficiency has consistently been the major contributor to economic growth between 1960–2014, with an average output elasticity of 0.46. Total useful exergy is also a major contributing factor, with an average output elasticity of 0.29. Both have a higher influence than capital, labor, or other energy variables (final energy, prices). An adequate integration of thermodynamic efficiency is thus crucial for macroeconomic models.