Karina Inés Paredes Páliz

Dr. Karina Inés Paredes Páliz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 January 2018 in Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KPKarina Inés Paredes Páliz
Karina Inés Paredes Páliz
Raquel Rodríguez VázquezRaquel Rodríguez Vázquez
Raquel Rodríguez Vázquez
Bernardo DuarteBernardo Duarte
Bernardo Duarte
MCM A Caviedes
M A Caviedes
Enrique NaranjoEnrique Naranjo
Enrique Naranjo
EPEloisa Pajuelo
Eloisa Pajuelo

14 July 2016 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KPKarina Inés Paredes Páliz
Karina Inés Paredes Páliz
MCMiguel A. Caviedes
Miguel A. Caviedes
BDBouchra Doukkali
Bouchra Doukkali
Enrique NaranjoEnrique Naranjo
Enrique Naranjo
IRIgnacio D. Rodríguez-Llorente
Ignacio D. Rodríguez-Llorente
EPEloisa Pajuelo
Eloisa Pajuelo

1 December 2017 in Marine Pollution Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKarina Inés Paredes Páliz
Karina Inés Paredes Páliz
Enrique NaranjoEnrique Naranjo
Enrique Naranjo
BDBouchra Doukkali
Bouchra Doukkali
MCMiguel A. Caviedes
Miguel A. Caviedes
Susana Redondo-GómezSusana Redondo-Gómez
Susana Redondo-Gómez
EPEloisa Pajuelo
Eloisa Pajuelo

1 September 2016 in Marine Pollution Bulletin
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KPKarina Inés Paredes Páliz
Karina Inés Paredes Páliz
EPEloisa Pajuelo
Eloisa Pajuelo
BDBouchra Doukkali
Bouchra Doukkali
MCMiguel Ángel Caviedes
Miguel Ángel Caviedes
IRIgnacio Rodríguez-Llorente
Ignacio Rodríguez-Llorente
Enrique NaranjoEnrique Naranjo
Enrique Naranjo

19 November 2024 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Talía TeneTalía Tene
Talía Tene
Fabian Ernesto Arias AriasFabian Ernesto Arias Arias
Fabian Ernesto Arias Arias
KPKarina Inés Paredes Páliz
Karina Inés Paredes Páliz
CBCamilo Pavel Haro Barroso
Camilo Pavel Haro Barroso
Cristian Vacacela GomezCristian Vacacela Gomez
Cristian Vacacela Gomez
Graphene-enhanced surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensors offer promising advancements in viral detection, particularly for SARS-CoV-2. This study presents the design and optimization of a multilayer SPR biosensor incorporating silver, silicon nitride, single-layer graphene, and thiol-tethered ssDNA to achieve high sensitivity and specificity. Key metrics, including SPR angle shift (Δθ), sensitivity (S), detection accuracy (DA), and figure of merit (FoM), were assessed across SARS-CoV-2 concentrations from 150 to 525 mM. The optimized biosensor achieved a sensitivity of 315.91°/RIU at 275 mM and a maximum Δθ of 4.2° at 400 mM, demonstrating strong responsiveness to virus binding. The sensor maintained optimal accuracy and figure of merit at lower concentrations, with a linear sensitivity response up to 400 mM, after which surface saturation limited further responsiveness. These results highlight the suitability of the optimized biosensor for real-time, point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 detection, particularly at low viral loads, supporting its potential in early diagnostics and epidemiological monitoring.

23 January 2025 in Micromachines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Talía TeneTalía Tene
Talía Tene
Fabian Ernesto Arias AriasFabian Ernesto Arias Arias
Fabian Ernesto Arias Arias
KPKarina Inés Paredes Páliz
Karina Inés Paredes Páliz
APAna M. Cunachi Pillajo
Ana M. Cunachi Pillajo
AHAna Gabriela Flores Huilcapi
Ana Gabriela Flores Huilcapi
Stefano BellucciStefano Bellucci
Stefano Bellucci
This study presents the optimization of two SPR biosensors, Sys3 and Sys5, for SARS-CoV-2 detection at concentrations of 0.01–100 nM. Sys3, with a 55 nm silver layer, a 13 nm silicon nitride layer, and a 10 nm ssDNA layer, achieved a figure of merit (FoM) of 571.24 RIU−1, a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 0.12, and a detection accuracy (DA) of 48.93 × 10−2. Sys5, incorporating a 50 nm silver layer, a 10 nm silicon nitride layer, a 10 nm ssDNA layer, and a 1.6 nm tungsten disulfide layer (L = 2), demonstrated a higher sensitivity of 305.33 °/RIU and a lower limit of detection (LoD) of 1.65 × 10−5. Sys3 outshined in precision with low attenuation (<1%), while Sys5 provided enhanced sensitivity and lower detection limits, crucial for early-stage viral detection. These configurations align with the refractive index ranges of clinical SARS-CoV-2 samples, showcasing their diagnostic potential. Future work will focus on experimental validation and integration into point-of-care platforms.