Weiping Gong

Dr. Weiping Gong

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 November 2024 in Journal of Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WGWenzhou Guo
Wenzhou Guo
PWPeifang Wang
Peifang Wang
WWWenjun Wu
Wenjun Wu
CZConrad Zorn
Conrad Zorn
MDMingze Du
Mingze Du
XHXiao Huang
Xiao Huang

26 October 2024 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WGWeiping Gong
Weiping Gong
Qin ZhangQin Zhang
Qin Zhang
ZFZeMeng Fan
ZeMeng Fan
Wenjiao ShiWenjiao Shi
Wenjiao Shi
Na ZhaoNa Zhao
Na Zhao
Tianxiang YueTianxiang Yue
Tianxiang Yue
In the context of achieving global carbon neutrality, forests play a pivotal role in sequestering atmospheric CO2, particularly in China, where forest management is central to national climate strategies. This study evaluates the forest carbon sink capacity in Zixi County, a subtropical region, under varying climate scenarios (SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5). Using the Forest-DNDC (Denitrification–Decomposition) model, combined with high-precision climate data and a random forest model, we simulate forest carbon density and forest carbon sink under different management strategies. The results indicate that under the baseline scenario, forest carbon density in Zixi County increases by 31% over 42 years under the SSP2-4.5 climate scenario and by 28.6% under SSP5-8.5. In the enhancing economic scenario, carbon density increases by 8.5% under SSP2-4.5 and by 7.2% under SSP5-8.5. For the natural development scenario, a significant increase of 130% is observed under SSP2-4.5, while SSP5-8.5 shows an increase of 120%. Spatially, forest carbon sinks in Zixi County total 843,152 T C in 2020, 542,852 T C in 2030, and 877,802 T C in 2060 under the baseline SSP2-4.5 scenario; under SSP5-8.5, these values are 841,321 T C in 2020, 531,301 T C in 2030, and 1,016,402 T C in 2060. In the enhancing economic scenario, the total carbon sink is 34,650 T C in both 2020 and 2030, increasing to 427,351 T C in 2060 under SSP2-4.5, while under SSP5-8.5, it is 46,200 T C in 2020, 34,650 T C in 2030, and 415,801 T C in 2060. The natural development scenario shows the total carbon sink under SSP2-4.5 as 11,157,332 T C in 2020, 3,441,910 T C in 2030, and 1,409,104 T C in 2060, and under SSP5-8.5, it is 10,903,231 T C in 2020, 3,337,960 T C in 2030, and 1,131,903 T C in 2060. Spatial analysis reveals that elevation and forest type significantly affect carbon density, with high-altitude areas and forests dominated by Chinese fir and broadleaf species showing higher carbon accumulation. The findings highlight the importance of targeted forest management, prioritizing species with higher carbon sequestration potential and considering spatial heterogeneity. These strategies, applied locally, can contribute to broader national and global carbon neutrality efforts.

11 September 2023
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
WGWeiping Gong
Weiping Gong
ZWZong Wang
Zong Wang
Qin ZhangQin Zhang
Qin Zhang
Tianxiang YueTianxiang Yue
Tianxiang Yue
Denitrification-Decomposition (DNDC) model, a mathematical construct that simulates biogeochemical processes including carbon and nitrogen dynamics, plant growth, and microbial activity across various ecosystems. The discourse includes an examination of the model’s developmental trajectory, with attention given to adaptations created for diverse ecosystems, regions, specific crops, and modular configurations. We additionally delve into the validation processes of the DNDC model and its broader applications across different fields. Despite the model’s extensive usage in previous studies, there has been a lack of critical, comprehensive evaluation of its merits and demerits. This paper aim to address this gap, providing a thorough critique and review of the DNDC model. In our discussion, we present a balanced overview of the DNDC model’s current strengths and weaknesses, and offer insights into its potential future developments. The ultimate goal of this paper is twofold. Firstly, we aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners who are either currently employing or considering the use of the DNDC model. Secondly, our critique and analysis is intended to be a constructive contribution towards the model’s future refinement and development.