Jasim M. Albandar

Prof. Jasim M. Albandar


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 1999 in Journal of Periodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJasim M. Albandar
Jasim M. Albandar
JBJ.A. Brunelle
J.A. Brunelle
AKA. Kingman
A. Kingman
Background: Accurate information on the prevalence and extent of periodontal diseases in the United States adult population is lacking. This study estimated the prevalence and extent of periodontal disease in the United States using data from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III).Methods: A nationally representative sample was obtained during 1988 to 1994 by a stratified, multi‐stage probability sampling design. A subsample of 9,689 dentate persons 30 to 90 years old who received a periodontal examination was used in this study, representing approximately 105.8 million civilian, non‐institutionalized Americans in 1988 to 1994. Periodontal attachment loss, probing depth, and furcation involvement were assessed in 2 randomly selected quadrants per person. Attachment loss and probing depth were assessed at 2 sites per tooth, the mesiobuccal and mid‐buccal surfaces. The periodontal status of each subject was assessed by criteria based on the extent and severity of probing depth and furcation involvement. These assessments were used to classify each subject as having a mild, moderate, or advanced form of the disease. In the analyses, weighted data were used to reflect the complex sampling method.Results: Prevalence of attachment loss ≥ 3 mm was 53.1% for the population of dentate U.S. adults 30 to 90 years of age and, on average, 19.6% of teeth per person were affected. The prevalence of probing depth ≥ 3 mm was 63.9% and, on average, 19.6% of teeth were affected. Fourteen percent of these persons had furcation involvement in one or more teeth. We estimate that at least 35% of the dentate U.S. adults aged 30 to 90 have periodontitis, with 21.8% having a mild form .6% having a moderate or severe form. The prevalence and extent of attachment loss and the prevalence of periodontitis increase considerably with age. However, the prevalence of moderate and advanced periodontitis decreases in adults 80 years of age and older. This is most likely attributed to a combination of a high prevalence of tooth loss and gingival recession in the oldest age cohorts. Attachment loss and destructive periodontitis were consistently more prevalent in males than females, and more prevalent in blacks and Mexican Americans than whites. We estimate that in persons 30 years and older, there are .2 and 67.6 million persons who, on average, have about a third of their remaining teeth affected by ≥ 3 mm attachment loss and probing depth, respectively. We also estimate that about 21 million persons have at least one site with ≥ 5 mm attachment loss, and 35.7 million persons have periodontitis. These are conservative estimates based on partial‐mouth examinations, and the true prevalence and extent of periodontal disease may be significantly higher than what is reported here.Conclusions: Periodontitis is prevalent in the U.S. adult population. The results show that black and Mexican American males have poorer periodontal health than the rest of the U.S. adult population. Primary and secondary preventive measures should therefore be specifically targeted towards these groups. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 13‐29.

1 April 2002 in Periodontology 2000
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJasim M. Albandar
Jasim M. Albandar

1 January 1999 in Journal of Periodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJasim M. Albandar
Jasim M. Albandar
AKA. Kingman
A. Kingman
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and extent of gingival recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus in United States adults, using data collected in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III).Methods: The study group consisted of 9,689 persons 30 to 90 years of age obtained by a stratified, multi‐stage probability sampling method in 1988 to 1994. The weighted sample is representative of U.S. adults 30 years or older and represents approximately 105.8 million civilian, non‐institutionalized Americans. Gingival recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus were assessed at the mesio‐buccal and mid‐buccal surfaces in 2 randomly selected quadrants, one maxillary and one mandibular. Data analysis accounted for the complex sampling design used.Results: We estimate that 23.8 million persons have one or more tooth surfaces with ≥3 mm gingival recession; 53.2 million have gingival bleeding; 97.1 million have calculus; and 58.3 million have subgingival calculus; and the corresponding percentages are 22.5%, 50.3%, 91.8%, and 55.1% of persons, respectively. The prevalence, extent, and severity of gingival recession increased with age, as did the prevalence of subgingival calculus and the extent of teeth with calculus and gingival bleeding. Males had significantly more gingival recession, gingival bleeding, subgingival calculus, and more teeth with total calculus than females. Of the 3 race/ethnic groups studied, non‐Hispanic blacks had the highest prevalence and extent of gingival recession and dental calculus, whereas Mexican Americans had the highest prevalence and extent of gingival bleeding. Mexican Americans had similar prevalence and extent of gingival recession compared with non‐Hispanic whites. Gingival recession was much more prevalent and also more severe at the buccal than the mesial surfaces of teeth. Gingival bleeding also was more prevalent at the buccal than mesial surfaces, whereas calculus was most often present at the mesial than buccal surfaces.Conclusions: Dental calculus, gingival bleeding, and gingival recession are common in the U.S. adult population. In addition to their unfavorable effect on esthetics and self‐esteem, these conditions also are associated with destructive periodontal diseases and root caries. Appropriate measures to prevent or control these conditions are desirable, and this may also be effective in improving the oral health of the U.S. adult population. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 30‐43.

20 June 2018 in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSøren Jepsen
Søren Jepsen
JCJack G. Caton
Jack G. Caton
JAJasim M. Albandar
Jasim M. Albandar
NBNabil F. Bissada
Nabil F. Bissada
BPBouchard Philippe
Bouchard Philippe
KYKazuhisa Yamazaki
Kazuhisa Yamazaki
Background: A variety of systemic diseases and conditions can affect the course of periodontitis or have a negative impact on the periodontal attachment apparatus. Gingival recessions are highly prevalent and often associated with hypersensitivity, the development of caries and non‐carious cervical lesions on the exposed root surface and impaired esthetics. Occlusal forces can result in injury of teeth and periodontal attachment apparatus. Several developmental or acquired conditions associated with teeth or prostheses may predispose to diseases of the periodontium. The aim of this working group was to review and update the 1999 classification with regard to these diseases and conditions, and to develop case definitions and diagnostic considerations.Methods: Discussions were informed by four reviews on 1) periodontal manifestions of systemic diseases and conditions; 2) mucogingival conditions around natural teeth; 3) traumatic occlusal forces and occlusal trauma; and 4) dental prostheses and tooth related factors. This consensus report is based on the results of these reviews and on expert opinion of the participants.Results: Key findings included the following: 1) there are mainly rare systemic conditions (such as Papillon‐Lefevre Syndrome, leucocyte adhesion deficiency, and others) with a major effect on the course of periodontitis and more common conditions (such as diabetes mellitus) with variable effects, as well as conditions affecting the periodontal apparatus independently of dental plaque biofilm‐induced inflammation (such as neoplastic diseases); 2) diabetes‐associated periodontitis should not be regarded as a distinct diagnosis, but diabetes should be recognized as an important modifying factor and included in a clinical diagnosis of periodontitis as a descriptor; 3) likewise, tobacco smoking – now considered a dependence to nicotine and a chronic relapsing medical disorder with major adverse effects on the periodontal supporting tissues – is an important modifier to be included in a clinical diagnosis of periodontitis as a descriptor; 4) the importance of the gingival phenotype, encompassing gingival thickness and width in the context of mucogingival conditions, is recognized and a novel classification for gingival recessions is introduced; 5) there is no evidence that traumatic occlusal forces lead to periodontal attachment loss, non‐carious cervical lesions, or gingival recessions; 6) traumatic occlusal forces lead to adaptive mobility in teeth with normal support, whereas they lead to progressive mobility in teeth with reduced support, usually requiring splinting; 7) the term biologic width is replaced by supracrestal tissue attachment consisting of junctional epithelium and supracrestal connective tissue; 8) infringement of restorative margins within the supracrestal connective tissue attachment is associated with inflammation and/or loss of periodontal supporting tissue. However, it is not evident whether the negative effects on the periodontium are caused by dental plaque biofilm, trauma, toxicity of dental materials or a combination of these factors; 9) tooth anatomical factors are related to dental plaque biofilm‐induced gingival inflammation and loss of periodontal supporting tissues.Conclusion: An updated classification of the periodontal manifestations and conditions affecting the course of periodontitis and the periodontal attachment apparatus, as well as of developmental and acquired conditions, is introduced. Case definitions and diagnostic considerations are also presented.

1 April 2002 in Periodontology 2000
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JAJasim M. Albandar
Jasim M. Albandar
TRThomas E. Rams
Thomas E. Rams

23 March 2015 in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BHBirte Holtfreter
Birte Holtfreter
JAJasim M. Albandar
Jasim M. Albandar
TDThomas Dietrich
Thomas Dietrich
BDBruce A. Dye
Bruce A. Dye
KEKenneth Anthony Eaton
Kenneth Anthony Eaton
TKThomas Kocher
Thomas Kocher