In this paper, the deformation behavior of UNS S32750 (S32750) duplex stainless steel during low cycle fatigue was studied by controlling the number of cycles. The microstructure of the specimens under different cycles was characterized by optical microscope (OM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The microhardness of the two phases was measured by a digital microhardness instrument. The results showed that the microhardness of ferrite increases significantly after the first 4000 cycles, while the austenite shows a higher strain hardening rate after fatigue fracture, and the microhardness of ferrite and austenite increases by 23 HV and 87 HV, respectively. The two-phase kernel average misorientation (KAM) diagram showed that the continuous accumulation of plastic deformation easily leads to the initiation of cracks inside the austenite and at the phase boundaries. The evolution of dislocation morphology in the two phases was obviously different. With the increase in cycle number, the dislocation in ferrite gradually transforms from dislocation bundles and a dislocation array to a sub-grain structure, while the dislocation in austenite gradually develops from dipole array to an ordered Taylor lattice network structure.

In this study, we investigated the two-phase hardening behavior and microstructural evolution of S32750 duplex stainless steel during the tensile deformation process. The analysis was conducted using in situ electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and microhardness testing. It was observed that strain transfer occurred between the two phases in the position away from the fracture. The ferrite phase exhibited softening, while the austenite phase underwent hardening. In the region less than 1 mm from the fracture site, both phases experienced a rapid hardening, with the maximum hardness difference between the two phases near the fracture reaching approximately 45 HV. In situ EBSD results indicate that the kernel average misorientation (KAM) value for the ferrite phase consistently exceeds that of the austenite phase during the initial stages of deformation. Conversely, in the final stages of deformation, the KAM value for austenite surpasses that of ferrite. In the initial stage of deformation, the type of grain boundaries in both phases remains largely unaltered. However, in the later stages of deformation, there is a marked increase in the number of small-angle grain boundaries within ferrite, which become approximately three times that of the large-angle grain boundaries. As deformation progresses, the maximum orientation distribution density of the ferrite phase is reduced by approximately 50%, with the preferred orientation shifting from the {100} plane to the {111} plane. In contrast, the orientation distribution of the austenite remains relatively uniform, with no significant change in the maximum orientation distribution density observed. This indicates that after substantial deformation, the rotation of ferrite grains significantly increases the deformation resistance, whereas the austenite phase continues to harden. This differential behavior leads to the continuous accumulation of strain at the phase boundaries, ultimately causing cracks to form at these boundaries and resulting in the sample’s fracture.

This paper investigates the tensile and low-cycle fatigue characteristics of S32750 duplex stainless steel subjected to two distinct solid solution treatment temperatures. The microstructures, fracture surfaces, and slip systems of the tested steel were analyzed using optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques. The findings reveal that elevating the solid solution treatment temperature from 1080 °C to 1180 °C results in an increase in the yield strength of the tested steel by approximately 36 MPa and a substantial enhancement in fatigue life by 34%. Microhardness measurements indicate that the degree of hardening in austenite post-fatigue failure significantly surpasses that of ferrite. The variation in solid solution temperature alters the ferrite and austenite content within the matrix, consequently affecting the strain distribution between the two phases. The high-temperature solid solution treatment effectively enhances the two-phase strain-bearing capacity of the tested steel. Following the 1180 °C solid solution treatment, no cloud-like dislocation patterns were observed in the ferrite; instead, they were replaced by a proliferation of thick, interwoven dislocation bundles. In contrast, the dislocations within the austenite predominantly consist of ordered planar slip and twinning. The primary contributor to the extended fatigue life is the increased number of absorbed dislocations within the ferrite grains.

In this paper, the deformation behavior of S32750 duplex stainless steel during low cycle fatigue was studied by controlling number of cycles. The microstructure of the specimens under different cycles was characterized by optical microscope (OM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). Microhardness of two phases was measured by a digital microhardness instrument. The results showed that the microhardness of ferrite increases significantly after the first 4000 cycles, while the austenite shows a higher strain hardening rate after fatigue fracture, and the microhardness of ferrite and austenite increases by 23 HV and 87 HV, respectively. Two-phase kernel average misorientation (KAM) diagram showed that the continuous accumulation of plastic deformation easily leads to the initiation of cracks inside the austenite and at the phase boundaries. The evolution of dislocation morphology in two phases was obviously different. With the increase of cycle number, the dislocation in ferrite gradually transforms from dislocation bundles and dislocation array to sub-grain structure, while the dislocation in austenite gradually develops from dipole array to ordered Taylor lattice network structure.