This study aimed to investigate the performance of a deep learning-based survival-prediction model, which predicts the overall survival (OS) time of glioblastoma patients who have received surgery followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The medical records of glioblastoma patients who had received surgery and CCRT between January 2011 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Based on our inclusion criteria, 118 patients were selected and semi-randomly allocated to training and test datasets (3:1 ratio, respectively). A convolutional neural network–based deep learning model was trained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and clinical profiles to predict OS. The MRI was reconstructed by using four pulse sequences (22 slices) and nine images were selected based on the longest slice of glioblastoma by a physician for each pulse sequence. The clinical profiles consist of personal, genetic, and treatment factors. The concordance index (C-index) and integrated area under the curve (iAUC) of the time-dependent area-under-the-curve curves of each model were calculated to evaluate the performance of the survival-prediction models. The model that incorporated clinical and radiomic features showed a higher C-index (0.768 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.759, 0.776)) and iAUC (0.790 (95% CI: 0.783, 0.797)) than the model using clinical features alone (C-index = 0.693 (95% CI: 0.685, 0.701); iAUC = 0.723 (95% CI: 0.716, 0.731)) and the model using radiomic features alone (C-index = 0.590 (95% CI: 0.579, 0.600); iAUC = 0.614 (95% CI: 0.607, 0.621)). These improvements to the C-indexes and iAUCs were validated using the 1000-times bootstrapping method; all were statistically significant (p < 0.001). This study suggests the synergistic benefits of using both clinical and radiomic parameters. Furthermore, it indicates the potential of multi-parametric deep learning models for the survival prediction of glioblastoma patients.

Purpose: Organ-at-risk segmentation is essential in adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Learning-based automatic segmentation can reduce committed labor and accelerate the ART process. In this study, an auto-segmentation model was developed by employing individual patient datasets and a deep-learning-based augmentation method for tailoring radiation therapy according to the changes in the target and organ of interest in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: Two computed tomography (CT) datasets with well-defined labels, including contoured prostate, bladder, and rectum, were obtained from 18 patients. The labels of the CT images captured during radiation therapy (CT^2nd) were predicted using CT images scanned before radiation therapy (CT^1st). From the deformable vector fields (DVFs) created by using the VoxelMorph method, 10 DVFs were extracted when each of the modified CT and CT^2nd images were deformed and registered to the fixed CT^1st image. Augmented images were acquired by utilizing 110 extracted DVFs and spatially transforming the CT^1st images and labels. An nnU-net autosegmentation network was trained by using the augmented images, and the CT^2nd label was predicted. A patient-specific model was created for 18 patients, and the performances of the individual models were evaluated. The results were evaluated by employing the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average Hausdorff distance, and mean surface distance. The accuracy of the proposed model was compared with those of models trained with large datasets. Results: Patient-specific models were developed successfully. For the proposed method, the DSC values of the actual and predicted labels for the bladder, prostate, and rectum were 0.94 ± 0.03, 0.84 ± 0.07, and 0.83 ± 0.04, respectively. Conclusion: We demonstrated the feasibility of automatic segmentation by employing individual patient datasets and image augmentation techniques. The proposed method has potential for clinical application in automatic prostate segmentation for ART.

This study aimed to predict stress in patients using artificial intelligence (AI) from biological signals and verify the effect of stress on respiratory irregularity. We measured 123 cases in 41 patients and calculated stress scores with seven stress-related features derived from heart-rate variability. The distribution and trends of stress scores across the treatment period were analyzed. Before-treatment information was used to predict the stress features during treatment. AI models included both non-pretrained (decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, long short-term memory (LSTM), and transformer) and pretrained (ChatGPT) models. Performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, exact match ratio, accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score. Respiratory irregularities were calculated in phase and amplitude and analyzed for correlation with stress score. Over 90% of the patients experienced stress during radiation therapy. LSTM and prompt engineering GPT4.0 had the highest accuracy (feature classification, LSTM: 0.703, GPT4.0: 0.659; stress classification, LSTM: 0.846, GPT4.0: 0.769). A 10% increase in stress score was associated with a 0.286 higher phase irregularity (p < 0.025). Our research pioneers the use of AI and biological signals for stress prediction in patients undergoing radiation therapy, potentially identifying those needing psychological support and suggesting methods to improve radiotherapy effectiveness through stress management.

Stress can reduce the accuracy of radiation therapy owing to muscle contraction and changes in breathing patterns. This study aimed to predict stress in patients before each treatment session using artificial intelligence (AI) from biological signals to enhance treatment accuracy. We measured 123 stress cases in 41 patients and calculated stress scores by analyzing seven stress-related features derived from heart rate variability obtained from photoplethysmography. The study analyzed stress score distribution and observed its trend changes throughout the treatment. Before-treatment information was used to predict changes in stress features during treatment. AI models included both non-pre-trained (Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Transformer) and pre-trained (ChatGPT) models. The performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation, exact match ratio, accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 score. More than 90% of the patients experienced stress during radiation therapy. From all the classifications, LSTM and prompt engineering GPT4.0 had the highest accuracy (feature classification, LSTM: 0.703, GPT4.0: 0.659, stress classification: LSTM: 0.846, GPT4.0: 0.769). Our research pioneers the use of AI and biological signals for stress prediction in radiation therapy, potentially identifying patients needing psychological support, and suggesting methods to improve radiotherapy effectiveness through stress management.