The Amazon Forest, the largest contiguous tropical forest in the world, stores a significant fraction of the carbon on land. Changes in climate and land use affect total carbon stocks, making it critical to continuously update and revise the best estimates for the region, particularly considering changes in forest dynamics. Forest inventory data cover only a tiny fraction of the Amazon region, and the coverage is not sufficient to ensure reliable data interpolation and validation. This paper presents a new forest above-ground biomass map for the Brazilian Amazon and the associated uncertainty both with a resolution of 250 meters and baseline for the satellite dataset the year of 2016 (i.e., the year of the satellite observation). A significant increase in data availability from forest inventories and remote sensing has enabled progress towards high-resolution biomass estimates. This work uses the largest airborne LiDAR database ever collected in the Amazon, mapping 360,000 km² through transects distributed in all vegetation categories in the region. The map uses airborne laser scanning (ALS) data calibrated by field forest inventories that are extrapolated to the region using a machine learning approach with inputs from Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR), vegetation indices obtained from the Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite, and precipitation information from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM). A total of 174 field inventories geolocated using a Differential Global Positioning System (DGPS) were used to validate the biomass estimations. The experimental design allowed for a comprehensive representation of several vegetation types, producing an above-ground biomass map varying from a maximum value of 518 Mg ha⁻¹, a mean of 174 Mg ha⁻¹, and a standard deviation of 102 Mg ha⁻¹. This unique dataset enabled a better representation of the regional distribution of the forest biomass and structure, providing further studies and critical information for decision-making concerning forest conservation, planning, carbon emissions estimate, and mechanisms for supporting carbon emissions reductions.

Carbon (C) emissions from forest fires in the Amazon during extreme droughts may correspond to more than half of the global emissions resulting from land cover changes. Despite their relevant contribution, forest fire-related C emissions are not directly accounted for within national-level inventories or carbon budgets. A fundamental condition for quantifying these emissions is to have a reliable estimation of the extent and location of land cover types affected by fires. Here, we evaluated the relative performance of four burned area products (TREES, MCD64A1 c6, GABAM, and Fire_cci v5.0), contrasting their estimates of total burned area, and their influence on the fire-related C emissions in the Amazon biome for the year 2015. In addition, we distinguished the burned areas occurring in forests from non-forest areas. The four products presented great divergence in the total burned area and, consequently, total related C emissions. Globally, the TREES product detected the largest amount of burned area (35,559 km²), and consequently it presented the largest estimate of committed carbon emission (45 Tg), followed by MCD64A1, with only 3% less burned area detected, GABAM (28,193 km²) and Fire_cci (14,924 km²). The use of Fire_cci may result in an underestimation of 29.54 ± 3.36 Tg of C emissions in relation to the TREES product. The same pattern was found for non-forest areas. Considering only forest burned areas, GABAM was the product that detected the largest area (8994 km²), followed by TREES (7985 km²), MCD64A1 (7181 km²) and Fire_cci (1745 km²). Regionally, Fire_cci detected 98% less burned area in Acre state in southwest Amazonia than TREES, and approximately 160 times less burned area in forests than GABAM. Thus, we show that global products used interchangeably on a regional scale could significantly underestimate the impacts caused by fire and, consequently, their related carbon emissions.

We investigated the potential of hyperspectral remote sensing to estimate aboveground biomass (AGB) over the Brazilian savannas (Cerrado), the second-largest source of carbon emissions in Brazil. For this purpose, a Hyperion/Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) image was collected in the dry season at the Ecological Station of Águas Emendadas (ESAE). In order to estimate the AGB, we evaluated the performance of five machine learning models (Classification and Regression Trees – CART; Cubist – CB, Partial Least Squares Regression – PLS; Random Forest – RF; and Support Vector Machine – SVM) and four sets of metrics (reflectance, narrowband vegetation indices – VIs; absorption band parameters; and the combination of these attributes). The lowest root mean square error (RMSE) was obtained for RF using VIs (29%) and a combination of metrics (28%). For VIs, RF differed from CUB, PLS and SVM at 5% significance level. From cross-validation results, the RMSE was 26.36% for grasslands, 35.04% for open savannas, and 24.85% for dense savannas. The RF model with VIs had the most stable predictive performance across the models, as indicated by small variations in RMSE from CART to SVM. The five most important ranked VIs in the RF model were the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Pigment Specific Simple Ratio (PSSR), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Red Edge Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (RENDVI) and Structure Insensitive Pigment Index (SIPI). Most of their relationships with AGB were non-linear. The resultant AGB estimates showed consistent results with a vegetation cover map of the ESAE. Areas of the ESAE with AGB lower than 10 Mg.ha⁻¹ were coincident with the occurrence of grassland physiognomies (savanna grasslands and shrub savannas), while areas with AGB higher than 25 Mg.ha⁻¹ matched the occurrence of dense savanna physiognomies (woodland savanna and dense woodland savanna). Grassland areas showed larger values of coefficient of variation (CV) than areas of dense savannas. These first-hand results set a baseline of models and metrics for AGB modeling of savannas during the future transition from current sampling-type hyperspectral missions (< 10 km of swath) to large-coverage hyperspectral satellites (> 100 km of swath).

Integrating Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI) enhances the assessment of tropical forest degradation and regeneration, which is crucial for conservation and climate mitigation strategies. This study optimized procedures using combined airborne LiDAR, HSI data, and machine learning algorithms across 12 sites in the Brazilian Amazon, covering various environmental and anthropogenic conditions. Four forest classes (undisturbed, degraded, and two stages of second-growth) were identified using Landsat time series (1984–2017) and auxiliary data. Metrics from 600 samples were analyzed with three classifiers: Random Forest, Stochastic Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector Machine. The combination of LiDAR and HSI data improved classification accuracy by up to 12% compared with single data sources. The most decisive metrics were LiDAR-based upper canopy cover and HSI-based absorption bands in the near-infrared and shortwave infrared. LiDAR produced significantly fewer errors for discriminating second-growth from old-growth forests, while HSI had better performance to discriminate degraded from undisturbed forests. HSI-only models performed similarly to LiDAR-only models (mean F1 of about 75% for both data sources). The results highlight the potential of integrating LiDAR and HSI data to improve our understanding of forest dynamics in the context of nature-based solutions to mitigate climate change impacts.

Full-waveform LiDAR (FWF) offers a promising advantage over other technologies to represent the vertical canopy structure of secondary successions in the Amazon region, as the waveform encapsulates the properties of all elements intercepting the emitted beam. In this study, we investigated modifications in the vertical structure of the Amazonian secondary successions across the vegetation gradient from early to advanced stages of vegetation regrowth. The analysis was performed over two distinct climatic regions (Drier and Wetter), designated using the Maximum Cumulative Water Deficit (MCWD). The study area was covered by 309 sample plots distributed along 25 LiDAR transects. The plots were grouped into three successional stages (early—SS1; intermediate—SS2; advanced—SS3). Mature Forest (MF) was used as a reference of comparison. A total of 14 FWF LiDAR metrics from four categories of analysis (Height, Peaks, Understory and Gaussian Decomposition) were extracted using the Waveform LiDAR for Forestry eXtraction (WoLFeX) software (v1.1.1). In addition to examining the variation in these metrics across different successional stages, we calculated their Relative Recovery (RR) with vegetation regrowth, and evaluated their ability to discriminate successional stages using Random Forest (RF). The results showed significant differences in FWF metrics across the successional stages, and within and between sample plots and regions. The Drier region generally exhibited more pronounced differences between successional stages and lower FWF metric values compared to the Wetter region, mainly in the category of height, peaks, and Gaussian decomposition. Furthermore, the Drier region displayed a lower relative recovery of metrics in the early years of succession, compared to the areas of MF, eventually reaching rates akin to those of the Wetter region as succession progressed. Canopy height metrics such as Waveform distance (WD), and Gaussian Decomposition metrics such as Bottom of canopy (BC), Bottom of canopy distance (BCD) and Canopy distance (CD), related to the height of the lower forest stratum, were the most important attributes in discriminating successional stages in both analyzed regions. However, the Drier region exhibited superior discrimination between successional stages, achieving a weighted F1-score of 0.80 compared to 0.73 in the Wetter region. When comparing the metrics from SS in different stages to MF, our findings underscore that secondary forests achieve substantial relative recovery of FWF metrics within the initial 10 years after land abandonment. Regions with potentially slower relative recovery (e.g., Drier regions) may require longer-term planning to ensure success in providing full potential ecosystem services in the Amazon.