Background: Breast reconstruction (BR) following mastectomy is a well-established beneficial medical intervention for patient physical and psychological well-being. Previous studies have emphasized BR as the gold standard of care for breast cancer patients requiring surgery. Multiple policies have improved BR access, but there remain social, economic, and geographical barriers to receiving reconstruction. Threats to equitable healthcare for all breast cancer patients in America persist despite growing awareness and efforts to negate these disparities. While race/ethnicity has been correlated with differences in BR rates and outcomes, ongoing research outlines a multitude of issues underlying this variance. Understanding the current and continuous barriers will help to address and overcome gaps in access. Methods: A systematic review assessing three reference databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Ovid Medline) was carried out in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A keyword search was conducted on 3 February 2024, specifying results between 2004 and 2024. Studies were included based on content, peer-reviewed status, and publication type. Two independent reviewers screened results based on title/abstract appropriateness and relevance. Data were extracted, cached in an online reference collection, and input into a cloud-based database for analysis. Results: In total, 1756 references were populated from all databases (PubMed = 829, Ovid Medline = 594, and Web of Science = 333), and 461 duplicate records were removed, along with 1147 results deemed ineligible by study criteria. Then, 45 international or non-English results were excluded. The screening sample consisted of 103 publications. After screening, the systematic review produced 70 studies with satisfactory relevance to our study focus. Conclusions: Federal mandates have improved access to women undergoing postmastectomy BR, particularly for younger, White, privately insured, urban-located patients. Recently published studies had a stronger focus on disparities, particularly among races, and show continued disadvantages for minorities, lower-income, rural-community, and public insurance payers. The research remains limited beyond commonly reported metrics of disparity and lacks examination of additional contributing factors. Future investigations should elucidate the effect of these factors and propose measures to eliminate barriers to access to BR for all patients.

Background and Objectives: Breast reconstruction following mastectomy improves quality of life and psychosocial outcomes, yet it is not consistently performed despite multiple federal mandates. Current data shows decreased reconstruction in minority races, those with a low socioeconomic status, and those holding public health insurance. Many barriers remain misunderstood or unstudied. This study examines barriers to post-mastectomy breast reconstruction to promote a supportive clinical climate by addressing multifactorial obstacles to equitable access to care. Materials and Methods: The California Cancer Registry Data Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and California Health and Human Services Agency Cancer Surgeries Database (2013–2021 and 2000–2021, respectively) were used in this retrospective observational study on mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), delayed breast reconstruction (DBR), or mastectomy only (MO) rates. Data were collected on age, sex, race, insurance type, hospital type, socioeconomic status, and residence. Pearson’s chi-square analysis was performed. Results: We found that 168,494 mastectomy and reconstruction surgeries were performed (82.36% MO, 7% IBR, 10.6% DBR). The 40–49 age group received significantly less MO (38.1%) compared to the 70–74 age group (94.8%, (p = <0.001). Significantly more reconstruction was carried out in patients with private, HMO, or PPO insurance (IBR 75.86%, DBR 75.32%, p = <0.001). Almost all breast surgeries were in urban areas as opposed to rural/isolated rural areas (96.02% vs. 1.55%, p = <0.001). There was no significant difference between races. Of all surgeries, 7.46% were completed in a cancer center with significantly higher rates of IBR. LA County, San Luis Obispo/Ventura County, and Northern CA had significantly more MO than other regions (p = <0.001). Conclusions: Reconstruction rates after mastectomy are low, with only 17.64% of patients undergoing reconstruction. Nationally, 70.5% of patients received MO, with 29.6% undergoing reconstruction. Significant factors positively contributing to reconstruction were private insurance, high SES, cancer center care, and urban residency. Identified barriers include public health insurance enrollment, rural or non-urban residence, older age, low SES, and non-white race/ethnicity, indicating potential monetary influences on care.

Background: Lymphatic dyes are commonly used to map the drainage path from tumor to lymphatics, which are biopsied to determine if spread has occurred. A blue dye in combination with technetium-99 is considered the gold standard for mapping, although many other dyes and dye combinations are used. Not all of these substances have the same detection efficacy. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Medline was performed. The predefined search terms were (indocyanine green OR isosulfan blue OR lymphazurin OR patent blue OR methylene blue OR fluorescein OR technetium-99) AND combination AND dye AND (sentinel lymph node biopsy OR lymphedema OR lymphatics OR lymph OR microsurgery OR cancer OR tumor OR melanoma OR carcinoma OR sarcoma). Results: The initial search returned 4267 articles. From these studies, 37 were selected as candidates that met inclusion criteria. After a full-text review, 34 studies were selected for inclusion. Eighty-nine methods of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection were trialed using 22 unique dyes, dye combinations, or other tracers. In total, 12,157 SLNs of 12,801 SLNs were identified. Dye accuracy ranged from 100% to 69.8% detection. Five dye combinations had 100% accuracy. Dye combinations were more accurate than single dyes. Conclusions: Combining lymphatic dyes improves SLN detection results. Replacing technetium-99 with ICG may allow for increased access to SLN procedures with comparable results. The ideal SLN tracer is a low-cost molecule with a high affinity for lymphatic vessels due to size and chemical composition, visualization without specialized equipment, and no adverse effects.

Background and Objectives: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a complication of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) may help to decrease lymphedema after ALND by creating lymphatic bypasses. This retrospective single-institution study aimed to compare lymphedema in patients undergoing ALND with and without ILR. Materials and Methods: Bioimpedance and limb measurements determined the presence of BCRL. The categorical data that were collected and analyzed included BMI, comorbidities, BCRL onset, and number of lymphatic bypasses. Pearson’s chi-square test and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with the onset of lymphedema. An odds ratio compared the incidence of BCRL with and without ILR. Results: In total, 186 patients underwent ALND, 44 (24%) with ILR and 142 (76%) without. The mean number of bypasses during ILRs created was 3.54. The odds of developing lymphedema with ILR were 64% lower than for ALND alone. ILR patients who developed BCRL had a mean onset of 543 days post-operatively versus 389 days in the control group. Age, ethnicity, BMI, and bypass amount had no significant influence on lymphedema development. Conclusions: ILR was associated with lower rates of BCRL after ALND. Patients who developed lymphedema despite undergoing ILR did so 8 months later than the controls.

Background: Implant-based reconstruction (IBR) is the most common method of breast reconstruction, but complications lead to patient distress and delays in cancer treatment. Management of implant complications is varied with no defined guidelines. The inability to salvage IBR is associated with infection, but the impact of antibiotics remains controversial. We aimed to analyze factors affecting salvage rates of threatened IBR requiring operative intervention. The primary outcomes were the rates of unplanned re-operation for threatened IBR for wound closure, exchange, or explant. We hypothesized antibiotic administration would improve salvage rates. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy with IBR from 2012 to 2023 was performed. Threatened IBR was defined as implant exposure, infection, skin necrosis, hematoma, seroma, or wound dehiscence without implant exposure. Management options for patients with implant infection included implant removal and antibiotic treatment, antibiotic treatment alone, implant replacement, washout and implant replacement, or implant removal without a salvage attempt. Results: In total, 6901 patients underwent post-mastectomy IBR, and 184 (2.7%) patients had an unplanned re-operation. A total of 166/184 patients (90.2%) underwent explantation, and 18/184 (9.8%) patients had implant salvage. Between the explant and salvage groups, there were no differences in patient demographics, oncologic treatments, or operative characteristics. The explant group had a higher rate of infection (77.7% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in culture positivity or antibiotic administration history. Conclusions: Implant salvage is feasible but limited by infection. Antibiotic administration does not improve salvage rates. Patient factors, oncologic treatment factors, or operative factors do not impact the ability to salvage.

Background: Large-volume ptotic breasts are associated with incision complication rates in single-stage direct-to-implant pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. The aim is to propose an updated surgical approach for this patient population. Methods: A small retrospective case series of patients who underwent direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without a wise-pattern incision from 2019 to 2024 at a single academic institution. Results: Eight breasts from five patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. One patient had minimal superior nipple–areolar complex ischemia with no additional postoperative complications identified. Conclusions: Refinement to a popular direct-to-implant breast reconstruction technique has the potential to decrease complication rates and improve aesthetic outcomes in large-volume ptotic breasts.