When clinicians opt for antithrombotic therapy to manage or prevent thrombotic complications during pregnancy, it is imperative to consider the unique physiological state of the pregnant woman’s body, which can influence the pharmacokinetics of the drug, its ability to traverse the placental barrier, and its potential teratogenic effects on the fetus. While the efficacy and safety of aspirin during pregnancy have been relatively well-established through numerous clinical studies, understanding the effects of newer, more potent antiplatelet agents has primarily stemmed from individual clinical case reports necessitating immediate administration of potent antiplatelet therapy during pregnancy. This review consolidates the collective experiences of clinicians confronting novel thrombotic complications during pregnancy, often requiring the use of dual antiplatelet therapy. The utilization of potent antiplatelet therapy carries inherent risks of bleeding, posing threats to both the pregnant woman and the fetus, as well as the potential for teratogenic effects on the fetus. In the absence of official guidelines regarding the use of potent antiplatelet drugs in pregnancy, a plethora of cases have demonstrated the feasibility of preventing recurrent thrombotic complications, mitigating bleeding risks, and successfully managing pregnancies, frequently culminating in cesarean deliveries, through meticulous selection and dosing of antiplatelet medications.

Caesarean section is a challenging intervention in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. We present a case of a 32-year-old pregnant woman experiencing large acute myocardial infarction (MI) of the anterolateral wall, complicated by cardiogenic shock in the 38th week of pregnancy, and treated with drug-eluting stent implantation and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and ticagrelor. Less than 24 h after the MI delivery started, an urgent Caesarean section was indicated. As multiplate aggregometry testing showed a relatively insufficient level of ticagrelor platelet inhibition and a moderate level of aspirin platelet inhibition, a Caesarean section was performed without discontinuation of ticagrelor, which was decided due to the need for emergency surgery. Local hemostatic measures including administration of tranexamic acid were applied. The patient did not experience excessive bleeding. A healthy male baby was born. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of surgery in pregnant women treated with DAPT without ticagrelor discontinuation.

Cesarean section is a challenge intervention in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. We present case of 32 years old pregnant woman experiencing large acute myocardial infarction (MI) of anterolateral wall complicated by cardiogenic shock in the 38th week of pregnancy treated with drug-eluting stent implantation and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and ticagrelor. Less than 24 hours after MI delivery started, urgent Caesarean section was indicated. As multiplate aggregometry testing showed a relatively insufficient level of ticagrelor platelet inhibition and a moderate level of aspirin platelet inhibition, Caesarean section was performed without discontinuation of ticagrelor, which was decided due to the need for emergency surgery. Local hemostatic measures including administration of tranexamic acid were applied. The patient did not experience excessive bleeding. A healthy male baby was born. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of surgery in pregnant women treated with DAPT without ticagrelor discontinuation.