Consolidation therapies for children with intermediate- or high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are urgently needed to achieve higher cure rates while limiting therapy-related toxicities. We determined if adoptive transfer of natural killer (NK) cells from haploidentical killer immunoglobulin–like receptor (KIR)–human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched donors may prolong event-free survival in children with intermediate-risk AML who were in first complete remission after chemotherapy. Patients received cyclophosphamide (Day − 7), fludarabine (Days − 6 through − 2), and subcutaneous interleukin-2 (Days − 1, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9). Purified, unmanipulated NK cells were infused on Day 0, and NK cell chimerism and phenotyping from peripheral blood were performed on Days 7, 14, 21, and 28. As primary endpoint, the event-free survival was compared to a cohort of 55 patients who completed chemotherapy and were in first complete remission but did not receive NK cells. Donor NK cell kinetics were determined as secondary endpoints. Twenty-one patients (median age at diagnosis, 6.0 years [range, 0.1–15.3 years]) received a median of 12.5 × 10⁶ NK cells/kg (range, 3.6–62.2 × 10⁶ cells/kg) without major side effects. All but 3 demonstrated transient engraftment with donor NK cells (median peak donor chimerism, 4% [range, 0–43%]). KIR–HLA-mismatched NK cells expanded in 17 patients (81%) and contracted in 4 (19%). However, adoptive transfer of NK cells did not decrease the cumulative incidence of relapse (0.393 [95% confidence interval: 0.182–0.599] vs. 0.35 [0.209–0.495]; P = .556) and did not improve event-free (60.7 ± 10.9% vs. 69.1 ± 6.8%; P = .553) or overall survival (84.2 ± 8.5% vs. 79.1 ± 6.6%; P = .663) over chemotherapy alone. The lack of benefit may result from insufficient numbers and limited persistence of alloreactive donor NK cells but does not preclude its potential usefulness during other phases of therapy, or in combination with other immunotherapeutic agents. Trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00703820. Registered 24 June 2008.

Purpose: Cytarabine (also known as ara-C) has been the backbone of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) chemotherapy for more than five decades. Recent pharmacogenomics-based 10-SNP ara-C (ACS10) scores showed low ACS10 (≤0) to be associated with poor outcomes in patients with AML treated with standard chemotherapy. Here, we evaluated the ACS10 score in the context of three different induction I regimens in patients with pediatric AML. Experimental Design: ACS10 score groups (low, ≤0, or high, >0) were evaluated for association with event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) by three randomized treatment arms in patients treated on the AML02 (NCT00136084) and AML08 (NCT00703820) clinical trials: AML02 low-dose ara-C (LDAC arm, n = 91), AML02 + AML08 high-dose ara-C (HDAC arm, n = 194), and AML08 clofarabine + ara-C (Clo/ara-C arm, n = 105) induction I regimens. Results: Within the low-ACS10 score (≤0) group, significantly improved EFS and OS were observed among patients treated with Clo/ara-C as compared with LDAC (EFS, HR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23–0.88; P = 0.020; OS, HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.19–0.99; P = 0.048). In contrast, within the high-ACS10 score group (score >0), augmentation with Clo/ara-C was not favorable as compared with LDAC (Clo/ara-C vs. LDAC, EFS, HR = 1.95; 95% CI, 1.05–3.63; P = 0.035; OS, HR = 2.10; 95% CI, 0.96–4.59; P = 0.063). Personalization models predicted 9% improvement in the outcome in ACS10 score–based tailored induction (Clo/ara-C for low and LDAC for high-ACS10 score groups) as compared with nonpersonalized approaches (P < 0.002). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that tailoring induction regimens using ACS10 scores can significantly improve outcomes in patients with AML. Given the SNPs are germline, preemptive genotyping can accelerate matching the most effective remission induction regimen.

INTRODUCTION: Vincristine sulfate liposome injection (VSLI), a liposomal formulation of vincristine, may be better tolerated than standard aqueous vincristine and enable dose intensification. PROCEDURES: Based on single‐agent tolerability, activity, and FDA approval in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), we tested the safety and feasibility of VSLI as replacement for standard vincristine in the UK ALL R3 mitoxantrone‐based four‐drug induction (Cohort A), a three‐drug anthracycline‐free induction (Cohort B), and maintenance chemotherapy (Cohort C) in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B‐cell ALL. RESULTS: Among 29 participants with a median age of 12.4 years (range: 1.8–19.6 years), 16 received Cohort A, eight received Cohort B, and five received Cohort C therapy. Dose level 1 (DL1): 1.5 mg/m ² and dose level 2 (DL2): 2 mg/m ² of VSLI, each without a dose cap, were tested. Collectively, the median VSLI dose administered was 1.9 mg (range: 0.71–4.06 mg), and 13 (44.8%) received a dose above the standard 2 mg vincristine dose cap. Dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) at DL2 were seen in three patients, two in Cohort A and one in Cohort B, prompting further evaluation at DL1 for both cohorts. No DLTs were experienced at DL1. Only DL2 was tested in Cohort C—without DLT. Complete remissions were seen in 14 of 16 (87.5%) participants in Cohort A; three of eight (37.5%) in Cohort B; and one (20%) in Cohort C. VSLI with combination chemotherapy at DL1 was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Based on the promising response signal in this heavily pretreated population, further study of VSLI is warranted. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02879643)

Immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment approach in oncology, as it is specifically designed to boost the strength and accuracy of the immune system, allowing it to target tumor cells but spare non-tumor tissue. This treatment not only demonstrates potential for improved clinical outcomes but may also be associated with fewer adverse effects compared to traditional therapies. Despite its early success, the application of immunotherapy has largely been limited to adult cancer patients, with slow adoption noted in the treatment of pediatric cancer patients. Our objective is to demonstrate a single institution’s experience with immunotherapy in pediatric cancer patients and to discuss the use of these treatment modalities in this unique patient population. We performed a retrospective chart review and identified patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and/or underwent immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), quantification of tumor mutational burden (TMB), and classification of microsatellite instability (MSI) status. In total, we identified seven pediatric cancer patients who received therapy with ICIs. Four of these patients demonstrated positive PD-L1 expression, high TMB, and/or MSI-high status. These patients were treated with nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab or brentuximab. The diagnoses included: multifocal epithelioid and spindle cell hemangioma (n = 1); metastatic melanoma (n = 2); histiocytic sarcoma (n = 1); rectal adenocarcinoma in the setting of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) (n = 1); and Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 2). The patients received between four and nineteen cycles of immunotherapy. Immunotherapy-related adverse events included: mild allergic reaction; prodromal symptoms; anemia; neutropenia; transaminitis; endocrinopathies; and self-limiting neuritis. Of the seven patients, three are still being treated with immunotherapy (the patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, metastatic melanoma, and multifocal epithelioid and spindle cell hemangioma) with positive treatment responses observed on imaging, one is being treated with other modalities (the patient with Hodgkin lymphoma), two have achieved remission (the patients with metastatic melanoma and Hodgkin lymphoma), and one has relapsed (the patient with histiocytic sarcoma). The three patients who completed their immunotherapy regimens have been followed for 1 month, 4 months, and 10 months, respectively. This report of a single-institution experience with immunotherapy in pediatric cancer patients highlights the positive impact immunotherapy can have, especially when utilized to treat relapsed/refractory malignancies, as tumor regression or stabilization of disease burden was achieved in six of the patients described (CR = 2; PR = 4). Further research is needed to accurately identify pediatric oncology patients who could benefit from immunotherapy.