Aaron Paul Davis

Dr. Aaron Paul Davis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 April 2024 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAlexandre R. Zuntini
Alexandre R. Zuntini
TCTom Carruthers
Tom Carruthers
OMOlivier Maurin
Olivier Maurin
PBPaul C. Bailey
Paul C. Bailey
KLKevin Leempoel
Kevin Leempoel
WBWilliam J. Baker
William J. Baker
Angiosperms are the cornerstone of most terrestrial ecosystems and human livelihoods1,2. A robust understanding of angiosperm evolution is required to explain their rise to ecological dominance. So far, the angiosperm tree of life has been determined primarily by means of analyses of the plastid genome3,4. Many studies have drawn on this foundational work, such as classification and first insights into angiosperm diversification since their Mesozoic origins5–7. However, the limited and biased sampling of both taxa and genomes undermines confidence in the tree and its implications. Here, we build the tree of life for almost 8,000 (about 60%) angiosperm genera using a standardized set of 353 nuclear genes8. This 15-fold increase in genus-level sampling relative to comparable nuclear studies9 provides a critical test of earlier results and brings notable change to key groups, especially in rosids, while substantiating many previously predicted relationships. Scaling this tree to time using 200 fossils, we discovered that early angiosperm evolution was characterized by high gene tree conflict and explosive diversification, giving rise to more than 80% of extant angiosperm orders. Steady diversification ensued through the remaining Mesozoic Era until rates resurged in the Cenozoic Era, concurrent with decreasing global temperatures and tightly linked with gene tree conflict. Taken together, our extensive sampling combined with advanced phylogenomic methods shows the deep history and full complexity in the evolution of a megadiverse clade.

7 November 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ADAaron Paul Davis
Aaron Paul Davis
TGTadesse Woldemariam Gole
Tadesse Woldemariam Gole
SBSusana Baena
Susana Baena
Justin F. MoatJustin F. Moat
Justin F. Moat
Precise modelling of the influence of climate change on Arabica coffee is limited; there are no data available for indigenous populations of this species. In this study we model the present and future predicted distribution of indigenous Arabica, and identify priorities in order to facilitate appropriate decision making for conservation, monitoring and future research. Using distribution data we perform bioclimatic modelling and examine future distribution with the HadCM3 climate model for three emission scenarios (A1B, A2A, B2A) over three time intervals (2020, 2050, 2080). The models show a profoundly negative influence on indigenous Arabica. In a locality analysis the most favourable outcome is a c. 65% reduction in the number of pre-existing bioclimatically suitable localities, and at worst an almost 100% reduction, by 2080. In an area analysis the most favourable outcome is a 38% reduction in suitable bioclimatic space, and the least favourable a c. 90% reduction, by 2080. Based on known occurrences and ecological tolerances of Arabica, bioclimatic unsuitability would place populations in peril, leading to severe stress and a high risk of extinction. This study establishes a fundamental baseline for assessing the consequences of climate change on wild populations of Arabica coffee. Specifically, it: (1) identifies and categorizes localities and areas that are predicted to be under threat from climate change now and in the short- to medium-term (2020–2050), representing assessment priorities for ex situ conservation; (2) identifies ‘core localities’ that could have the potential to withstand climate change until at least 2080, and therefore serve as long-term in situ storehouses for coffee genetic resources; (3) provides the location and characterization of target locations (populations) for on-the-ground monitoring of climate change influence. Arabica coffee is confimed as a climate sensitivite species, supporting data and inference that existing plantations will be neagtively impacted by climate change.

4 January 2019 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ADAaron Paul Davis
Aaron Paul Davis
HCHelen Chadburn
Helen Chadburn
Justin F. MoatJustin F. Moat
Justin F. Moat
RORobert O’sullivan
Robert O’sullivan
SHSerene Hargreaves
Serene Hargreaves
ELEimear Nic Lughadha
Eimear Nic Lughadha
Extinction threatens at least 60% of wild coffee species, including those that are key to the future of the global coffee sector.

19 October 2011 in Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ADAaron Paul Davis
Aaron Paul Davis
JTJames Tosh
James Tosh
NRNicolas Ruch
Nicolas Ruch
MFMichael F. Fay
Michael F. Fay

19 November 2018 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ELEimear Nic Lughadha
Eimear Nic Lughadha
BWBarnaby E. Walker
Barnaby E. Walker
CCCatia Canteiro
Catia Canteiro
HCHelen Chadburn
Helen Chadburn
ADAaron Paul Davis
Aaron Paul Davis
MRMalin Cecilia Rivers
Malin Cecilia Rivers
Herbarium specimens provide verifiable and citable evidence of the occurrence of particular plants at particular points in space and time, and are vital resources for assessing extinction risk in the tropics, where plant diversity and threats to plants are greatest. We reviewed approaches to assessing extinction risk in response to the Convention on Biological Diversity's Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Target 2: an assessment of the conservation status of all known plant species by 2020. We tested five alternative approaches, using herbarium-derived data for trees, shrubs and herbs in five different plant groups from temperate and tropical regions. All species were previously fully assessed for the IUCN Red List. We found significant variation in the accuracy with which different approaches classified species as threatened or not threatened. Accuracy was highest for the machine learning model (90%) but the least data-intensive approach also performed well (82%). Despite concerns about spatial, temporal and taxonomic biases and uncertainties in herbarium data, when specimens represent the best available evidence for particular species, their use as a basis for extinction risk assessment is appropriate, necessary and urgent. Resourcing herbaria to maintain, increase and disseminate their specimen data is essential to guide and focus conservation action. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene’.

19 September 2007 in Annals of Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
OMOlivier Maurin
Olivier Maurin
ADAaron Paul Davis
Aaron Paul Davis
MCMichael Chester
Michael Chester
EMEsther F. Mvungi
Esther F. Mvungi
YJYasmina Jaufeerally-Fakim
Yasmina Jaufeerally-Fakim
MFMichael F. Fay
Michael F. Fay
The phylogenetic relationships between species of Coffea and Psilanthus remain poorly understood, owing to low levels of sequence variation recovered in previous studies, coupled with relatively limited species sampling. In this study, the relationships between Coffea and Psilanthus species are assessed based on substantially increased molecular sequence data and greatly improved species sampling. Phylogenetic relationships are assessed using parsimony, with sequence data from four plastid regions [trnL–F intron, trnL–F intergenic spacer (IGS), rpl16 intron and accD–psa1 IGS], and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear rDNA (ITS 1/5·8S/ITS 2). Supported lineages in Coffea are discussed within the context of geographical correspondence, biogeography, morphology and systematics. Several major lineages with geographical coherence, as identified in previous studies based on smaller data sets, are supported. Other lineages with either geographical or ecological correspondence are recognized for the first time. Coffea subgenus Baracoffea is shown to be monophyletic, but Coffea subgenus Coffea is paraphyletic. Sequence data do not substantiate the monophyly of either Coffea or Psilanthus. Low levels of sequence divergence do not allow detailed resolution of relationships within Coffea, most notably for species of Coffea subgenus Coffea occurring in Madagascar. The origin of C. arabica by recent hybridization between C. canephora and C. eugenioides is supported. Phylogenetic separation resulting from the presence of the Dahomey Gap is inferred based on sequence data from Coffea.