Drought resiliency strategies combine developmental, physiological, cellular, and molecular mechanisms. Here, we compare drought responses in two resilient spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes: a well-studied drought-resilient Drysdale and a resilient genotype from the US Pacific North-West Hollis. While both genotypes utilize higher water use efficiency through the reduction of stomatal conductance, other mechanisms differ. First, Hollis deploys the drought escape mechanism to a greater extent than Drysdale by accelerating the flowering time and reducing root growth. Second, Drysdale uses physiological mechanisms such as non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) to dissipate the excess of harvested light energy and sustain higher F_v/F_m and ϕ_PSII, whereas Hollis maintains constant NPQ but lower F_v/F_m and ϕ_PSII values. Furthermore, more electron donors of the electron transport chain are in the oxidized state in Hollis than in Drysdale. Third, many ROS homeostasis parameters, including peroxisome abundance, transcription of peroxisome biogenesis genes PEX11 and CAT, catalase protein level, and enzymatic activity, are higher in Hollis than in Drysdale. Fourth, transcription of autophagy flux marker ATG8.4 is upregulated to a greater degree in Hollis than in Drysdale under drought, whereas relative ATG8 protein abundance under drought stress is lower in Hollis than in Drysdale. These data demonstrate the activation of autophagy in both genotypes and a greater autophagic flux in Hollis. In conclusion, wheat varieties utilize different drought tolerance mechanisms. Combining these mechanisms within one genotype offers a promising strategy to advance crop resiliency.

Organelles function as hubs of cellular metabolism and elements of cellular architecture. In addition to 3 spatial dimensions that describe the morphology and localization of each organelle, the time dimension describes complexity of the organelle life cycle, comprising formation, maturation, functioning, decay, and degradation. Thus, structurally identical organelles could be biochemically different. All organelles present in a biological system at a given moment of time constitute the organellome. The homeostasis of the organellome is maintained by complex feedback and feedforward interactions between cellular chemical reactions and by the energy demands. Synchronized changes of organelle structure, activity, and abundance in response to environmental cues generate the fourth dimension of plant polarity. Temporal variability of the organellome highlights the importance of organellomic parameters for understanding plant phenotypic plasticity and environmental resiliency. Organellomics involves experimental approaches for characterizing structural diversity and quantifying the abundance of organelles in individual cells, tissues, or organs. Expanding the arsenal of appropriate organellomics tools and determining parameters of the organellome complexity would complement existing -omics approaches in comprehending the phenomenon of plant polarity. To highlight the importance of the fourth dimension, this review provides examples of organellome plasticity during different developmental or environmental situations.

Recycling of unnecessary or dysfunctional cellular structures through autophagy plays a critical role in cellular homeostasis and environmental resilience. Therefore, the autophagy trait may have been unintentionally selected in wheat breeding programs for higher yields in arid climates. This hypothesis was tested by measuring the response of three common autophagy markers, ATG7, ATG8, and NBR1, to a heat wave under reduced soil moisture content in 16 genetically diverse spring wheat landraces originating from different geographical locations. We observed in the greenhouse trials that ATG8 and NBR1 exhibited genotype-specific responses to a 1 h, 40 °C heat wave, while ATG7 did not show a consistent response. Three genotypes from Uruguay, Mozambique, and Afghanistan showed a pattern consistent with higher autophagic activity: decreased or stable abundance of both ATG8 and NBR1 proteins, coupled with increased transcription of ATG8 and NBR1. In contrast, three genotypes from Pakistan, Ethiopia, and Egypt exhibited elevated ATG8 protein levels alongside reduced or unaltered ATG8 transcript levels, indicating a potential suppression or no change in autophagic activity. Principal component analysis demonstrated a correlation between lower abundance of ATG8 and NBR1 proteins and higher yield in the field trials. We found that (i) the combination of heat and drought activated autophagy only in several genotypes, suggesting that despite being a resilience mechanism, autophagy is a heat-sensitive process; (ii) higher autophagic activity correlates positively with greater yield; (iii) the lack of autophagic activity in some high-yielding genotypes suggests contribution of alternative stress-resilient mechanisms; and (iv) enhanced autophagic activity in response to heat and drought was independently selected by wheat breeding programs in different geographic locations.