Denise Cantarelli Machado

Dr. Denise Cantarelli Machado

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2008 in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APAlexandre Vontobel Padoin
Alexandre Vontobel Padoin
JBJefferson Braga-Silva
Jefferson Braga-Silva
PMPedro Martins
Pedro Martins
KRKatia Rezende
Katia Rezende
ARAntonio Roberto da Rosa Rezende
Antonio Roberto da Rosa Rezende
DMDenise Cantarelli Machado
Denise Cantarelli Machado
Background: Recently, adipose tissue harvested by liposuction has been identified as a source of processed lipoaspirate cells. The aim of this study was to determine the concentration of processed lipoaspirate cells in adipose tissue obtained by liposuction from different harvest areas in women. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 25 women in whom liposuction in four or more different zones in the same procedure was indicated. After selective liposuction, the material was sent to the laboratory, where it was processed for extraction of processed lipoaspirate cells, which were separated from the adipose tissue, quantified, and characterized through determination of c-kit expression. The following harvest regions were evaluated: upper abdomen, lower abdomen, trochanteric region, inner thigh, knee, and flank. The cell concentration obtained at each site was compared by analysis of variance for mixed models. Results: A significant difference was found for cell concentration obtained at the different harvest sites. The cell concentration in the lower abdomen was greater than in other areas, but no significant difference was found in relation to the inner thigh. Conclusions: The lower abdomen and the inner thigh may have higher processed lipoaspirate cell concentrations. These sites may turn out to be better sources of adult mesenchymal stem cells.

1 January 2012 in Cell Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFMaurício A. G. Friedrich
Maurício A. G. Friedrich
MMMaurer P. Martins
Maurer P. Martins
MAMariana D. Araújo
Mariana D. Araújo
CKCharles Klamt
Charles Klamt
LVLeonardo Vedolin
Leonardo Vedolin
GFGabriel R. De Freitas
Gabriel R. De Freitas
Transplantation of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) has been proven safe in animal and human studies. However, there are very few studies in stroke patients. In this study, intra-arterial autologous BMMCs were infused in patients with moderate to severe acute middle cerebral artery infarcts. The subjects of this study included 20 patients with early or late spontaneous recanalization but with persistent deficits, in whom treatment could be initiated between 3 and 7 days after stroke onset. Mononuclear cells were isolated from bone marrow aspirates and infused at the proximal middle cerebral artery of the affected hemisphere. Safety analysis (primary endpoint) during the 6-month follow-up assessed death, any serious clinical events, neurological worsening with ≥ 4-point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, seizures, epileptogenic activity on electroencephalogram, and neuroimaging complications including new ischemic, hemorrhagic, or neoplastic lesions. Satisfactory clinical improvement (secondary endpoint) at 90 days was defined according to the pretreatment NIHSS scores as follows: modified Rankin Scale score of 0 in patients with NIHSS 14. Good clinical outcome was defined as mRS ≤2 at 90 days. Serial clinical, laboratory, electroencephalogram, and imaging evaluations showed no procedure-related adverse events. Satisfactory clinical improvement occurred in 6/20 (30%) patients at 90 days. Eight patients (40%) showed a good clinical outcome. Infusion of intra-arterial autologous BMMCs appears to be safe in patients with moderate to severe acute middle cerebral artery strokes. No cases of intrahospital mortality were seen in this pilot trial. Larger prospective randomized trials are warranted to assess the efficacy of this treatment approach.

1 July 2009 in Special Care in Dentistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EHEder Abreu Huttner
Eder Abreu Huttner
DMDenise Cantarelli Machado
Denise Cantarelli Machado
RORogerio Belle de Oliveira
Rogerio Belle de Oliveira
AAAndré Gustavo Freitas Antunes
André Gustavo Freitas Antunes
EHEduardo Hebling
Eduardo Hebling

1 December 1996 in European Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DMDenise Cantarelli Machado
Denise Cantarelli Machado
DHDonna Horton
Donna Horton
RHRichard Harrop
Richard Harrop
PPPeter T. Peachell
Peter T. Peachell
BHBirgit A. Helm
Birgit A. Helm

1 March 2009 in Differentiation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAna Paula Franco Lambert
Ana Paula Franco Lambert
AZAline Fraga Zandonai
Aline Fraga Zandonai
DBDiego Bonatto
Diego Bonatto
DMDenise Cantarelli Machado
Denise Cantarelli Machado
JHJoão Antônio Pêgas Henriques
João Antônio Pêgas Henriques

1 June 2003 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJosé Procopio Procópio Senna
José Procopio Procópio Senna
DRDaniela M Roth
Daniela M Roth
JOJaim S Oliveira
Jaim S Oliveira
DMDenise Cantarelli Machado
Denise Cantarelli Machado
DSDiógenes S Santos
Diógenes S Santos