Alzheimer’s disease (AD) causes a significant challenge to global healthcare systems, with limited effective treatments available. This review examines the landscape of novel therapeutic strategies for AD, focusing on the shortcomings of traditional therapies against amyloid-beta (Aβ) and exploring emerging alternatives. Despite decades of research emphasizing the role of Aβ accumulation in AD pathogenesis, clinical trials targeting Aβ have obtained disappointing results, highlighting the complexity of AD pathophysiology and the need for investigating other therapeutic approaches. In this manuscript, we first discuss the challenges associated with anti-Aβ therapies, including limited efficacy and potential adverse effects, underscoring the necessity of exploring alternative mechanisms and targets. Thereafter, we review promising non-Aβ-based strategies, such as tau-targeted therapies, neuroinflammation modulation, and gene and stem cell therapy. These approaches offer new avenues for AD treatment by addressing additional pathological hallmarks and downstream effects beyond Aβ deposition.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and Frontotemporal dementia (FDT) are progressive neurodegenerative disorders that, in several cases, overlap in clinical presentation, and genetic and pathological disease mechanisms. About 10–15% of ALS cases and up to 40% of FTD are familial, usually with dominant traits. ALS and FTD, in several cases, share common gene mutations, such as in C9ORF72, TARDBP, SQSTM-1, FUS, VCP, CHCHD10, and TBK-1. Also, several mechanisms are involved in ALS and FTD pathogenesis, such as protein misfolding, oxidative stress, and impaired axonal transport. In addition, neuroinflammation and neuroinflammatory cells, such as astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, and lymphocytes and, overall, the cellular microenvironment, have been proposed as pivotal players in the pathogenesis the ALS-FTD spectrum disorders. This review overviews the current evidence regarding neuroinflammatory markers in the ALS/FTD continuum, focusing on the neuroinflammatory pathways involved in the genetic cases, moving from post-mortem reports to in vivo biofluid and neuroimaging data. We further discuss the potential link between genetic and autoimmune disorders and potential therapeutic implications.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder defined clinically by progressive cognitive decline and memory impairment and pathologically by the accumulation of amyloid-beta plaques, tau neurofibrillary tangles, neuroinflammation, and immune system dysregulation. Peripheral biomarkers are gaining attention as valuable tools for elucidating neuroinflammatory mechanisms in the AD continuum, with potential implications for diagnosis and prognosis. Among these, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has emerged as a promising systemic inflammatory marker. NLR, a readily available and cost-effective parameter derived from routine blood tests, reflects the balance between innate and adaptive immune responses. Elevated NLR has been associated with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), showing correlations with disease severity, amyloid burden, and neuroinflammation. Increased neutrophil counts may contribute to neurodegeneration through oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokine release, while decreased lymphocyte levels suggest impaired adaptive immunity. However, despite growing evidence, the clinical utility of NLR in AD remains debated due to heterogeneity in study populations and confounding factors, such as comorbidities and medication effects. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the association between NLR and AD throughout the disease continuum. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies and integrative approaches that combine NLR with other inflammatory and neurodegenerative markers to enhance early diagnosis and personalized therapeutic strategies.

The conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia is influenced by several factors, including comorbid conditions such as metabolic and vascular diseases. Understanding the impact of these comorbidities can help in the disease management of patients with a higher risk of progressing to dementia, improving outcomes. In the current study, we aimed to analyze data from a large cohort of MCI (n = 188) by principal component analysis (PCA) and cluster analysis (CA) to classify patients into distinct groups based on their comorbidity profile and to predict the risk of conversion to dementia. From our analysis, four clusters emerged. CA showed a significantly higher rate of disease progression for Cluster 1, which was predominantly characterized by extremely high obesity and diabetes compared to other clusters. In contrast, Cluster 3, which was defined by a lower prevalence of all comorbidities, had a lower conversion rate. Cluster 2, mainly including subjects with traumatic brain injuries, showed the lowest rate of conversion. Lastly, Cluster 4, including a high load of hearing loss and depression, showed an intermediate risk of conversion. This study underscores the significant impact of specific comorbidity profiles on the progression from MCI to dementia, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and management strategies for individuals with these comorbidity profiles to potentially delay or prevent the onset of dementia.

Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by both motor and non-motor symptoms. A progressive neuronal loss and the consequent clinical impairment lead to deleterious effects on daily living and quality of life. Despite effective symptomatic therapeutic approaches, no disease-modifying therapies are currently available. Emerging evidence suggests that adopting a healthy lifestyle can improve the quality of life of Parkinson’s disease patients. In addition, modulating lifestyle factors can positively affect the microstructural and macrostructural brain levels, corresponding to clinical improvement. Neuroimaging studies may help to identify the mechanisms through which physical exercise, dietary changes, cognitive enrichment, and exposure to substances modulate neuroprotection. All these factors have been associated with a modified risk of developing PD, with attenuation or exacerbation of motor and non-motor symptomatology, and possibly with structural and molecular changes. In the present work, we review the current knowledge on how lifestyle factors influence Parkinson’s disease development and progression and the neuroimaging evidence for the brain structural, functional, and molecular changes induced by the adoption of positive or negative lifestyle behaviours.