Kenneth Weber

Dr. Kenneth Weber

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 December 2010 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSangeetha Madhavan
Sangeetha Madhavan
KWKenneth Weber
Kenneth Weber
JSJames W. Stinear
James W. Stinear

16 August 2021 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJulien Cohen-Adad
Julien Cohen-Adad
EAEva Alonso-Ortiz
Eva Alonso-Ortiz
MAMihael Abramovic
Mihael Abramovic
CACarina Arneitz
Carina Arneitz
NANicole Atcheson
Nicole Atcheson
JXJunqian Xu
Junqian Xu
In a companion paper by Cohen-Adadet al. we introduce thespine genericquantitative MRI protocol that provides valuable metrics for assessing spinal cord macrostructural and microstructural integrity. This protocol was used to acquire a single subject dataset across 19 centers and a multi-subject dataset across 42 centers (for a total of 260 participants), spanning the three main MRI manufacturers: GE, Philips and Siemens. Both datasets are publicly available via git-annex. Data were analysed using the Spinal Cord Toolbox to produce normative values as well as inter/intra-site and inter/intra-manufacturer statistics. Reproducibility for thespine genericprotocol was high across sites and manufacturers, with an average inter-site coefficient of variation of less than 5% for all the metrics. Full documentation and results can be found athttps://spine-generic.rtfd.io/. The datasets and analysis pipeline will help pave the way towards accessible and reproducible quantitative MRI in the spinal cord.

1 January 2016 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KWKenneth Weber
Kenneth Weber
YCYufen Chen
Yufen Chen
XWXue Wang
Xue Wang
TKThorsten Kahnt
Thorsten Kahnt
TPTodd Parrish
Todd Parrish

28 May 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KWKenneth Weber
Kenneth Weber
ASAndrew C. Smith
Andrew C. Smith
MWMarie Wasielewski
Marie Wasielewski
KEKamran Eghtesad
Kamran Eghtesad
PUPranav A. Upadhyayula
Pranav A. Upadhyayula
JEJames M. Elliott
James M. Elliott
Muscle fat infiltration (MFI) of the deep cervical spine extensors has been observed in cervical spine conditions using time-consuming and rater-dependent manual techniques. Deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) models have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in segmentation tasks. Here, we train and test a CNN for muscle segmentation and automatic MFI calculation using high-resolution fat-water images from 39 participants (26 female, average = 31.7 ± 9.3 years) 3 months post whiplash injury. First, we demonstrate high test reliability and accuracy of the CNN compared to manual segmentation. Then we explore the relationships between CNN muscle volume, CNN MFI, and clinical measures of pain and neck-related disability. Across all participants, we demonstrate that CNN muscle volume was negatively correlated to pain (R = −0.415, p = 0.006) and disability (R = −0.286, p = 0.045), while CNN MFI tended to be positively correlated to disability (R = 0.214, p = 0.105). Additionally, CNN MFI was higher in participants with persisting pain and disability (p = 0.049). Overall, CNN’s may improve the efficiency and objectivity of muscle measures allowing for the quantitative monitoring of muscle properties in disorders of and beyond the cervical spine.

5 August 2022 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EWE. O. Wesselink
E. O. Wesselink
JEJames Matthew Elliott
James Matthew Elliott
MCMichel Coppieters
Michel Coppieters
MHM. J. Hancock
M. J. Hancock
BCB. Cronin
B. Cronin
KWKenneth Weber
Kenneth Weber
The size, shape, and composition of paraspinal muscles have been widely reported in disorders of the cervical and lumbar spine. Measures of size, shape, and composition have required time-consuming and rater-dependent manual segmentation techniques. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) provide alternate timesaving, state-of-the-art performance measures, which could realise clinical translation. Here we trained a CNN for the automatic segmentation of lumbar paraspinal muscles and determined the impact of CNN architecture and training choices on segmentation performance. T2-weighted MRI axial images from 76 participants (46 female; age (SD): 45.6 (12.8) years) with low back pain were used to train CNN models to segment the multifidus, erector spinae, and psoas major muscles (left and right segmented separately). Using cross-validation, we compared 2D and 3D CNNs with and without data augmentation. Segmentation accuracy was compared between the models using the Sørensen-Dice index as the primary outcome measure. The effect of increasing network depth on segmentation accuracy was also investigated. Each model showed high segmentation accuracy (Sørensen-Dice index ≥ 0.885) and excellent reliability (ICC2,1 ≥ 0.941). Overall, across all muscles, 2D models performed better than 3D models (p = 0.012), and training without data augmentation outperformed training with data augmentation (p < 0.001). The 2D model trained without data augmentation demonstrated the highest average segmentation accuracy. Increasing network depth did not improve accuracy (p = 0.771). All trained CNN models demonstrated high accuracy and excellent reliability for segmenting lumbar paraspinal muscles. CNNs can be used to efficiently and accurately extract measures of paraspinal muscle health from MRI.

4 October 2018 in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HIHaisam Islam
Haisam Islam
CLChristine S. W. Law
Christine S. W. Law
KWKenneth Weber
Kenneth Weber
SMSean C. Mackey
Sean C. Mackey
GGGary H. Glover
Gary H. Glover