Mehari Tekeste

Dr. Mehari Tekeste

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2017 in Journal of Terramechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZSZamir Syed
Zamir Syed
MTMehari Tekeste
Mehari Tekeste
DWDavid White
David White

22 September 2021 in Soil Science Society of America Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DNDuc Ngo‐Cong
Duc Ngo‐Cong
Diogenes L. AntilleDiogenes L. Antille
Diogenes L. Antille
MGMartinus Th. van Genuchten
Martinus Th. van Genuchten
HNHung Q. Nguyen
Hung Q. Nguyen
MTMehari Tekeste
Mehari Tekeste
RGRichard J. Godwin
Richard J. Godwin
The water retention curve (WRC) of arable soils from the southeastern United States at different levels of compaction (no compaction, and 10 and 20% increases in soil bulk density) was estimated using the van Genuchten–Mualem (VG) model. The VG water retention parameters of the noncompacted soils were obtained first by fitting measured soil hydraulic data. To construct the WRC of the compacted soils, gravimetric values of the permanent wilting point (θ gw , 1,500 kPa) and the residual (θ gr ) water content were assumed to remain unchanged with compaction. The VG parameter α and exponent η after compaction were estimated using two approaches. In Approach 1, α and η were estimated from saturation, the permanent wilting point, and the residual water content. In Approach 2, the value of η was assumed to remain unchanged with compaction, which allowed α to be estimated immediately from the VG equation. Approach 2 was found to give slightly better agreement with measured data than Approach 1. The effect of compaction on the saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K s ) was predicted using semitheoretical approaches and the VG‐WRC function. HYDRUS‐1D was further used to simulate vertical infiltration into a single‐layered soil profile to determine the impact of compaction on the infiltration characteristics of the soils used in our analyses. Results showed that a 10–20% increase in soil bulk density, due to compaction, reduced cumulative infiltration ( I c ) at time T = T final (steady‐state) by 55–82%, and the available water storage capacity by 3–49%, depending upon soil type.

15 December 2023 in Journal of Terramechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NANisreen Alkhalifa
Nisreen Alkhalifa
MTMehari Tekeste
Mehari Tekeste
PJPius Jjagwe
Pius Jjagwe
TWThomas R. Way
Thomas R. Way

13 April 2023 in Journal of Terramechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PJPius Jjagwe
Pius Jjagwe
MTMehari Tekeste
Mehari Tekeste
NANisreen Alkhalifa
Nisreen Alkhalifa
TWThomas R. Way
Thomas R. Way

10 July 2020 in Soil Use and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMehari Tekeste
Mehari Tekeste
EEElnaz Ebrahimi
Elnaz Ebrahimi
MHMark H. Hanna
Mark H. Hanna
ENErica R. Neideigh
Erica R. Neideigh
RHRobert Horton
Robert Horton

17 January 2019 in Soil Use and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMehari Tekeste
Mehari Tekeste
HHHarold M. Hanna
Harold M. Hanna
ENErica R. Neideigh
Erica R. Neideigh
AGAndrew Guillemette
Andrew Guillemette