Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy due to its frequent recurrence and drug resistance even after successful initial treatment. Accumulating scientific evidence indicates that subpopulations of cancer cells with stem cell-like properties, such as so-called side population (SP) cells, are primarily responsible for these recurrences. A better understanding of SP cells may provide new clues for detecting and targeting these cancer-initiating cells and ultimately help to eradicate cancer. Changes in glycosylation patterns are remarkable features of SP cells. Here, we isolated SP cells from ovarian cancer cell lines and analyzed their glycosylation patterns using multiple glycomic strategies. Six high-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines were used for SP cell isolation. Among them, HO8910 pm, which contained the highest proportion of SP cells, was used for glycomic analysis of SP cells. Cell lysate of SP cells and main population cells was applied to lectin microarray and mass spectrometry for glycan profiling. Differently expressed glycan structures were further verified by lectin blot, flow cytometry, and real-time PCR analysis of their relevant enzymes. Expression of core fucosylated N-glycan and tumor-associated Tn, T and sT antigens were increased in SP cells. By contrast, SP cells exhibited decreased hybrid glycan, α2,3-linked sialic glycan and multivalent sialyl-glycan. Glycan structures, such as Tn, T, sT antigens, and core fucosylation may serve as biomarkers of ovarian cancer stem cells.

Our research aimed to investigate whether lymphadenectomy was required in patients with intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). Between 1989 and 2015, 1009 patients with intermediate-risk EEC: grade 1 or 2 tumor, <50% myometrial invasion, and a tumor diameter ≥ 2 cm and 818 low-risk patients with grade 1 or 2 tumor, <50% myometrial invasion, and a tumor diameter < 2 cm were enrolled in this study. The rate and risk factors of node metastasis were evaluated and compared between the two risk groups. Survival data were analyzed in patients with intermediate-risk EEC with or without lymphadenectomy. In all, 624 of 1009 (61.8%) patients with intermediate-risk EEC underwent pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy with a nodal metastasis rate of 1.9% (12/624), whereas 394 of 818 (48.2%) patients with low-risk EEC underwent pelvic ± para-aortic lymphadenectomy with a nodal metastasis rate of 0.3% (1/394) (p = 0.021). Notably, intermediate-risk EEC patients with a microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern of invasion, lymphatic vascular space invasion (LVSI), diffuse lesions, or lesions located in the cornua were more likely to have node metastasis. The 5-year overall cancer-related survival and the recurrence-free survival rates of the 742 intermediate-risk EEC patients who were followed for more than 3 years were 99.4% and 94.7%, respectively. In intermediate-risk group, 6 patients (6/443, 1.4%) with lymphadenectomy and 9 patients (9/299, 3.0%) without lymphadenectomy recurred, with a mean recurrence time of 38.3 and 18.7 months respectively. The five-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates of intermediate-risk patients with and without lymphadenectomy were similar (100% vs 98.9%, p = 0.351; 95.2% vs 93.3%, p = 0.464). Patients with intermediate-risk EEC have low nodal metastasis rate and a favorable outcome whether lymphadenectomy is performed or not. Omission of lymphadenectomy may be a reasonable option in the surgical management of patients with intermediate-risk EEC.

As a cancer type potentially dominated by copy number variations, ovarian cancer shows hyperploid karyotypes and large-scale chromosome alterations, which might be promising biomarkers correlated with tumor metastasis and chemoresistance. Experimental studies have provided more information about the roles of aneuploids and polyploids in ovarian cancer. However, ploidy evaluation of ovarian cancer cell lines is still limited, even in some ploidy-related research. Herein, the ploidy landscape of 51 ovarian cancer cell lines from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) were analyzed, and the ploidy statuses of 13 human ovarian cancer cell lines and 2 murine cell lines were evaluated using G-banding and flow cytometry. Most human ovarian cancer cell lines were aneuploid, with modal numbers of 52–86 and numerical complexity ranging from 5 to 12. A2780, COV434 and TOV21G were screened as diploid cell lines, with a modal number of 46, a low aneuploid score and a near-diploid ploidy value. Two murine cell lines, both OV2944-HM1 and ID-8, were near-tetraploid. Integrated information on karyotypes, aneuploid score and ploidy value supplied references for a nondiploid model construction and a parallel analysis of diploid versus aneuploid. Moreover, the gene expression profiles were compared between diploid and aneuploid cell lines. The functions of differentially expressed genes were mainly enriched in terms of protein function regulation, TGF-β signaling and cell adhesion molecules. Genes downregulated in the aneuploid group were mainly related to metabolism and protein function regulation, and genes upregulated in the aneuploid group were mainly involved in immune regulation. Differentially expressed genes were randomly distributed on all chromosomes, while chromosome 1 alteration might contribute to immune-related alterations in aneuploid cell lines. Chromosome 19 alteration might be potentially significant for aneuploid ovarian cancer cell lines and patients, which needs further verification in ploidy research.

Objective: This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the safety of ovarian preservation of premenopausal women with stage 1a endometrial carcinoma. Methods: We performed a population-based study to identify surgically treated stage Ia endometrial cancer of premenopausal women who were diagnosed between August 1989 and December 2015 in our center. Survival outcomes and recurrence rate were examined for premenopausal women who underwent ovarian preservation. Recurrence-free survival rates were calculated following generation of Kaplan–Meier curves and were compared with the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the independent factors affecting the recurrence rate. Results: Patients with ovarian preservation tended to be significantly younger at diagnosis, have less myometrial invasion, and were less likely to undergo lymphadenectomy compared with women treated with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the two groups. In the Cox regression model, ovarian preservation remained an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival. Conclusion: Ovarian preservation does not have a negative effect on oncological outcomes. Ovarian preservation can be applied to premenopausal women with stage Ia endometrial carcinoma.