Environmental factors such as extreme temperatures, humidity, wind, pollution, altitude, and diving can significantly impact athletes’ cardiovascular systems, potentially hindering their performance, particularly in outdoor sports. The urgency of this issue is heightened by the increasing prevalence of climate change and its associated conditions, including fluctuating pollution levels, temperature variations, and the spread of infectious diseases. Despite its critical importance, this topic is often overlooked in sports medicine. This narrative review seeks to address this gap by providing a comprehensive, evidence-based evaluation of how athletes respond to environmental stresses. A thorough assessment of current knowledge is essential to better prepare athletes for competition under environmental stress and to minimize the harmful effects of these factors. Specifically, adaptative strategies and preventative measures are vital to mitigating these environmental influences and ensuring athletes’ safety.

Background: The foot racing disciplines include sprints, middle distances, and long distances, which vary in terms of intensities, duration of training, and metabolic demands. The aim of our study was to evaluate the differences in morpho-functional parameters describing cardiac remodeling in a large cohort of Olympic athletes practicing the different track subspecialties. Methods: We evaluated 140 track and field (52.1% males, mean age 26.3 ± 4.3 years) Olympic athletes divided into four groups according to the distance performed: Group A (46, 32.9%): 100 and 200 mt; Group B (34, 24.3%): 400 mt; Group C (25, 17.9%): 800, 1500, and 3000 mt; Group D (35, 24.9%): 5000, 10,000 mt, and marathon distance. The athletes underwent a pre-participation screening, which included transthoracic echocardiography and exercise stress testing. Results: In Group A and in Group B, most athletes presented normal cardiac geometry (41/46, 89.1% in Group A and 31/34, 91.2% in Group B, p < 0.0001). Instead, in Groups C and D, more than half presented eccentric cardiac remodeling (13\25, 52% in Group C and 23\35, 65.7% in Group D). No significant differences were found between subspecialties in LVEF (p = 0.587), diastolic function (p = 0.431), and training hours/week (p = 0.078). Conclusions: In conclusion, the presence and extent of cardiac remodeling vary according to the distance of the discipline practiced, with the largest dimensional increase in both left and right ventricles and atria in mid- and long-distance runners and the lowest in sprinters.

Atherosclerosis is the leading cause of death worldwide, especially in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors were demonstrated to play a markedly protective role for the cardiovascular system beyond their glycemic control. Several cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT) reported the association between using these agents and a significant reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with T2D and a high cardiovascular risk profile. Moreover, recent evidence highlights a favorable benefit/risk profile in myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary revascularization settings. These clinical effects result from their actions on multiple molecular mechanisms involving the immune system, platelets, and endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells. This comprehensive review specifically concentrates on these cellular and molecular processes mediating the cardiovascular effects of incretins-like molecules, aiming to improve clinicians’ knowledge and stimulate a more extensive use of these drugs in clinical practice as helpful cardiovascular preventive strategies.

Background: For years, the left atrial appendage (LAA) was considered a simple recess of the atrial wall, but recently it has gained its own respectability in the cardiovascular field, therefore its accurate assessment cannot be overlooked in clinical practice. Percutaneous or surgical closure of the LAA has become a valid and safe alternative to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), who have long-term contraindications to anticoagulant therapy. Results: This progression was feasible thanks to the developments and the improvements of devices, surgical and imaging techniques. Objectives: This review explores the essential role of multimodality imaging in LAA, including new imaging tools, and its impact on the optimization of closure techniques and outcomes. Conclusions: Multimodality imaging is mandatory for each step along the therapeutic path: patient selection, pre-procedural planning, procedural monitoring, and follow-up.