Mohammad El-Garhy

Mohammad El-Garhy


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 August 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TOTamer Owais
Tamer Owais
OBOsama Bisht
Osama Bisht
MMMostafa Hossam El Din Moawad
Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad
MEMohammad El-Garhy
Mohammad El-Garhy
SSSina Stock
Sina Stock
PLPhilipp Lauten
Philipp Lauten
Background: Valve-in-Valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a potential solution for malfunctioning surgical aortic valve prostheses, though limited data exist for its use in Perceval valves. Methods: searches were performed on PubMed and Scopus up to 31 July 2023, focusing on case reports and series addressing VIV replacement for degenerated Perceval bioprostheses. Results: Our analysis included 57 patients from 27 case reports and 6 case series. Most patients (68.4%) were women, with a mean age of 76 ± 4.4 years and a mean STS score of 6.1 ± 4.3%. Follow-up averaged 9.8 ± 8.9 months, the mean gradient reduction was 15 ± 5.9 mmHg at discharge and 13 ± 4.2 mmHg at follow-up. Complications occurred in 15.7% of patients, including atrioventricular block III in four patients (7%), major bleeding or vascular complications in two patients (3.5%), an annular rupture in two patients (3.5%), and mortality in two patients (3.5%). No coronary obstruction was reported. Balloon-expanding valves were used in 61.4% of patients, predominantly the Sapien model. In the self-expanding group (38.6%), no valve migration occurred, with a permanent pacemaker implantation rate of 9%, compared to 5.7% for balloon-expanding valves. Conclusions: VIV-TAVR using both balloon-expanding and self-expanding technologies is feasible after the implantation of Perceval valves; however, it should be performed by experienced operators with experience both in TAVR and VIV procedures.

28 November 2025 in JACC: Case Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JWJohannes Wagner
Johannes Wagner
AIAndrejs Isajevs
Andrejs Isajevs
RRRenate Rauscher
Renate Rauscher
YNYounes Najim
Younes Najim
BVBiljana Vokic
Biljana Vokic
MEMohammad El-Garhy
Mohammad El-Garhy
The durability of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using the Edwards Sapien valve in a mitral ring remains uncertain. This report details a complex transseptal valve-in-valve-in-ring procedure and discusses long-term outcomes. A 73-year-old man, with a history of coronary bypass surgery and mitral valve reconstruction, underwent valve-in-ring implantation with an Edwards Sapien 3 26-mm prosthesis 7 years ago. Now he presented with progressive dyspnea (NYHA functional class III) due to severe prosthetic valve degeneration. A transseptal valve-in-valve intervention was performed using an Edwards Sapien 3 Ultra Resilia 26-mm valve inside the degenerated Sapien 3 26-mm valve within a 30-mm Physio ring. Procedural challenges of valve-in-valve-in-ring interventions and their impact on TMVR longevity are reviewed, highlighting imaging guidance, transseptal puncture, and valve durability as key factors for long-term outcomes. Transseptal valve-in-valve-in-ring implantation provides an alternative strategy for structural mitral valve deterioration. Long-term durability of TMVR requires continued assessment through dedicated registries and follow-up studies.