Successful pregnancy depends on precise molecular regulation of uterine physiology, especially during the menstrual cycle. Deregulated oxidative stress (OS), often influenced by inflammatory changes but also by environmental factors, represents a constant threat to this delicate balance. Oxidative stress induces a reciprocally regulated nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (Nrf2/PPARγ) pathway. However, increased PPARγ activity appears to be a double-edged sword in endometrial physiology. Activated PPARγ attenuates inflammation and attenuates OS to restore redox homeostasis. However, it also interferes with physiological processes during the menstrual cycle, such as hormonal signaling and angiogenesis. This review provides an elucidation of the molecular mechanisms that support the interplay between PPARγ and OS. Additionally, it offers fresh perspectives on the Nrf2/PPARγ pathway concerning endometrial receptivity and its potential implications for infertility.

A characteristic feature of uterine pathologies is a specific change in cell metabolism, which predominantly manifests as a shift in the need for nutrients, thereby directing cells to engage in different angiogenic marker activities. Angiogenesis is one of the main signals supporting the survival and development of cells and tissues not only under physiological conditions. Therefore, it is necessary that we understand pathological hyperactivation in all uterine diseases, from endometriosis through ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma to malignant transformed cells of the uterine epithelium and body. This work presents the gene expression results of selected angiogenesis targets (VEGF-A, TGF-β1, ANG1/2, and HIF-1α), cell migration, and cell–cell interaction determined in vitro. Our results suggest that angiogenesis varies in the tested pathological conditions (ectopic endometriosis—12Z; ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma—A2780; tumors—SK-UT-1 and RL-95-2) compared to physiological angiogenesis (HME1). The differential expression of angiogenic factors may contribute (or is a contributing factor) to the observed differences to acknowledge an inherent variability in angiogenesis among cell lines. Determining the genomic phenomena responsible for processes associated with inadequate angiogenesis in the pelvic region could help us to develop individual treatment strategies and explain resistance to treatment.