Cassandra Modahl

Dr. Cassandra Modahl

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 March 2020 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TTTakashi Tadokoro
Takashi Tadokoro
CMCassandra Modahl
Cassandra Modahl
KMkatsumi maenaka
katsumi maenaka
NANarumi Aoki-Shioi
Narumi Aoki-Shioi
The CAP protein superfamily (Cysteine-rich secretory proteins (CRISPs), Antigen 5 (Ag5), and Pathogenesis-related 1 (PR-1) proteins) is widely distributed, but for toxinologists, snake venom CRISPs are the most familiar members. Although CRISPs are found in the majority of venoms, very few of these proteins have been functionally characterized, but those that have been exhibit diverse activities. Snake venom CRISPs (svCRISPs) inhibit ion channels and the growth of new blood vessels (angiogenesis). They also increase vascular permeability and promote inflammatory responses (leukocyte and neutrophil infiltration). Interestingly, CRISPs in lamprey buccal gland secretions also manifest some of these activities, suggesting an evolutionarily conserved function. As we strive to better understand the functions that CRISPs serve in venoms, it is worth considering the broad range of CRISP physiological activities throughout the animal kingdom. In this review, we summarize those activities, known crystal structures and sequence alignments, and we discuss predicted functional sites. CRISPs may not be lethal or major components of venoms, but given their almost ubiquitous occurrence in venoms and the accelerated evolution of svCRISP genes, these venom proteins are likely to have functions worth investigating.

10 August 2020 in PLOS Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAvisha Chowdhury
Avisha Chowdhury
CMCassandra Modahl
Cassandra Modahl
STSiok Thing Tan
Siok Thing Tan
BXBenjamin Wong Wei Xiang
Benjamin Wong Wei Xiang
Dorothée MisséDorothée Missé
Dorothée Missé
JPJulien Pompon
Julien Pompon
Arbovirus infection of Aedes aegypti salivary glands (SGs) determines transmission. However, there is a dearth of knowledge on SG immunity. Here, we characterized SG immune response to dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses using high-throughput transcriptomics. We also describe a transcriptomic response associated to apoptosis, blood-feeding and lipid metabolism. The three viruses differentially regulate components of Toll, Immune deficiency (IMD) and c-Jun N- terminal Kinase (JNK) pathways. However, silencing of the Toll and IMD pathway components showed variable effects on SG infection by each virus. In contrast, regulation of the JNK pathway produced consistent responses in both SGs and midgut. Infection by the three viruses increased with depletion of the activator Kayak and decreased with depletion of the negative regulator Puckered. Virus-induced JNK pathway regulates the complement factor, Thioester containing protein-20 (TEP20), and the apoptosis activator, Dronc, in SGs. Individual and co-silencing of these genes demonstrate their antiviral effects and that both may function together. Co-silencing either TEP20 or Dronc with Puckered annihilates JNK pathway antiviral effect. Upon infection in SGs, TEP20 induces antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), while Dronc is required for apoptosis independently of TEP20. In conclusion, we revealed the broad antiviral function of JNK pathway in SGs and showed that it is mediated by a TEP20 complement and Dronc-induced apoptosis response. These results expand our understanding of the immune arsenal that blocks arbovirus transmission. Arboviral diseases caused by dengue (DENV), Zika (ZIKV) and chikungunya (CHIKV) viruses are responsible for large number of death and debilitation around the world. These viruses are transmitted to humans by the mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti. During the bites, infected salivary glands (SGs) release saliva containing viruses, which initiate human infection. As the tissue where transmitted viruses are produced, SG infection is a key determinant of transmission. To bridge the knowledge gap in vector-virus molecular interactions in SGs, we describe the transcriptome after DENV, ZIKV and CHIKV infection using RNA-sequencing and characterized the immune response in this tissue. Our study reveals the broad antiviral function of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway against DENV, ZIKV and CHIKV in SGs. We further show that it is mediated by the complement system and apoptosis, identifying the mechanism. Our study adds the JNK pathway to the immune arsenal that can be harnessed to engineer refractory vectors.

1 September 2016 in Toxicon
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMCassandra Modahl
Cassandra Modahl
AMAshis K. Mukherjee
Ashis K. Mukherjee
Stephen MackessyStephen Mackessy
Stephen Mackessy

15 August 2018 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CMCassandra Modahl
Cassandra Modahl
MRMrinalini
Mrinalini
SFSeth Frietze
Seth Frietze
Stephen MackessyStephen Mackessy
Stephen Mackessy
Venom proteins evolve rapidly, and as a trophic adaptation are excellent models for predator–prey evolutionary studies. The key to a deeper understanding of venom evolution is an integrated approach, combining prey assays with analysis of venom gene expression and venom phenotype. Here, we use such an approach to study venom evolution in the Amazon puffing snake, Spilotes sulphureus , a generalist feeder. We identify two novel three-finger toxins: sulditoxin and sulmotoxin 1. These new toxins are not only two of the most abundant venom proteins, but are also functionally intriguing, displaying distinct prey-specific toxicities. Sulditoxin is highly toxic towards lizard prey, but is non-toxic towards mammalian prey, even at greater than 22-fold higher dosage. By contrast, sulmotoxin 1 exhibits the reverse trend. Furthermore, evolutionary analysis and structural modelling show highest sequence variability in the central loop of these proteins, probably driving taxon-specific toxicity. This is, to our knowledge, the first case in which a bimodal and contrasting pattern of toxicity has been shown for proteins in the venom of a single snake in relation to diet. Our study is an example of how toxin gene neofunctionalization can result in a venom system dominated by one protein superfamily and still exhibit flexibility in prey capture efficacy.

1 March 2018 in Journal of Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DPDavinia Pla
Davinia Pla
DPDaniel Petras
Daniel Petras
ASAnthony J. Saviola
Anthony J. Saviola
CMCassandra Modahl
Cassandra Modahl
LSLibia Sanz
Libia Sanz
JCJuan Calvete
Juan Calvete

23 July 2019 in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CMCassandra Modahl
Cassandra Modahl
Stephen MackessyStephen Mackessy
Stephen Mackessy
Snake venom research has focused on front-fanged venomous snakes because of the high incidence of human morbidity and mortality from envenomations and larger venom yields of these species, while venoms from rear-fanged snakes have been largely neglected. Rear-fanged snakes (RFS) are a phylogenetically diverse collection of species that feed on a variety of prey and show varying prey capture strategies, from constriction to envenomation. In general, RFS venoms share many toxin families with front-fanged snakes, and venoms generally are either a neurotoxic three-finger toxin (3FTx)-dominated venom or an enzymatic metalloproteinase-dominated venom. These venoms have also been discovered to contain several unique venom protein families. New venom protein superfamilies in RFS venoms include matrix metalloproteinases, distinct from but closely related to snake venom metalloproteinases, veficolins, and acid lipases. Specialized three-finger toxins that target select prey taxa have evolved in some RFS venoms, and this prey capture strategy has appeared in multiple RFS species, from Old World Boiga to New World Spilotes and Oxybelis. Though this same protein superfamily is commonly found in the venoms of elapid (front-fanged) snakes, no elapid 3FTxs appear to show prey-specific toxicity (with the exception of perhaps Micrurus). Neofunctionalization of Spilotes sulphureus 3FTx genes has even resulted in the evolution within a single venom of 3FTxs selectively neurotoxic to different prey taxa (mammals or lizards), allowing this non-constricting RFS to take larger mammalian prey. The large number of 3FTx protein sequences available, together with a growing database of RFS venom 3FTxs, make possible predictions concerning structure-function relationships among these toxins and the basis of selective toxicity of specific RFS venom 3FTxs. Rear-fanged snake venoms are therefore of considerable research interest due to the evolutionary novelties they contain, providing insights into the evolution of snake venom proteins and potential predator-prey coevolution in a broader phylogenetic context. Because of the limited complexity of these venoms, they represent a more tractable source to inform about the biological roles of specific venom proteins that are found in the venoms of this rich diversity of snakes.