Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can alleviate upper gastrointestinal injury but paradoxically exacerbate aspirin (ASA)-induced small intestine injury. In this study, our goal was to simulate this exa...

Background With the aging of the population and rising incidence of thromboembolic events, the usage of antiplatelet agents is also increasing. There are few reports yet on the management of antiplatelet agents for patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Aims The aim of this study is to evaluate whether continued administration of antiplatelet agents is associated with an increased rate of delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD. Methods A total of 1022 colorectal neoplasms in 927 patients were dissected at Yokohama City University Hospital and its three affiliate hospitals between July 2012 and June 2017. We included the data of 919 lesions in the final analysis. The lesions were divided into three groups: the no-antiplatelet group (783 neoplasms), the withdrawal group (110 neoplasms), and the continuation group (26 neoplasms). Results Among the 919 lesions, bleeding events occurred in a total of 31 (3.37%). The rate of bleeding after ESD was 3.3% (26/783), 4.5% (5/110), and 0% (0/26), respectively. There were no significant differences in the rate of bleeding after ESD among the three groups (the withdrawal group vs. the no-antiplatelet group, the continuation group vs. the no-antiplatelet group, and the withdrawal group vs. the continuation group). Conclusions Continued administration of antiplatelet agents is not associated with any increase in the risk of delayed bleeding after colorectal ESD. Prospective, randomized studies are necessary to determine whether treatment with antiplatelet agents must be interrupted prior to colorectal ESD in patients who are at a high risk of thromboembolic events.

Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) may occur in patients receiving opioid treatment, decreasing their quality of life (QOL). We compared the effectiveness of magnesium oxide (MgO) with that of naldemedine (NAL) in preventing OIC. This proof-of-concept, randomized controlled trial (registration number UMIN000031891) involved 120 patients with cancer scheduled to receive opioid therapy. The patients were randomly assigned and stratified by age and sex to receive MgO (500 mg, thrice daily) or NAL (0.2 mg, once daily) for 12 weeks. The change in the average Japanese version of Patient Assessment of Constipation QOL (JPAC-QOL) from baseline to 2 weeks was assessed as the primary endpoint. The other endpoints were spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) and complete SBMs (CSBMs). Deterioration in the mean JPAC-QOL was significantly lower in the NAL group than in the MgO group after 2 weeks. There were fewer adverse events in the NAL group than in the MgO group. Neither significant differences in the change in SBMs between the groups nor serious adverse events/deaths were observed. The CSBM rate was higher in the NAL group than in the MgO group at 2 and 12 weeks. In conclusion, NAL significantly prevented deterioration in constipation-specific QOL and CSBM rate compared with MgO.

Background/Aims. The “Resect and Discard” strategy is a potentially useful strategy. At present, only the lesion size and accuracy of diagnosis are cited as considerations for clinical adoption of this strategy. On the other hand, histopathology of the resected specimens after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) reveals often an unclear or positive-margin status, implying Incomplete Polyp Resection (IPR). If IPR indeed increased the risk of local recurrence, histopathological evaluation of the margin would be indispensable and clinical adoption of this strategy is difficult. The aim of this study is to verify the association between IPR and the risk of local recurrence. Methods. The 1872 polyps and 603 EMR cases in 597 patients who had EMR between May 2013 and May 2014 were enrolled. The local recurrence rate until 3 years after the EMR in cases with the target lesions of the “Resect and Discard” strategy was determined in the negative-margin and IPR groups. Results. The final analysis was performed using the data of 1092 polyps, and 222 were categorized into the IPR group. There were no cases of recurrence in either of the groups. Conclusion. This is the world’s first report conducted to examine the correlation of IPR and the local recurrence rate for clinical practice of “Resect and Discard” strategy. There is the possibility that pathological evaluation of the margins after EMR in patients with small polyps can be skipped.

Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) are widely used drugs for treating allergic asthma, and they have recently been suggested to have a suppressive effect on carcinogenesis and cancer cell proliferation. Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) are considered a reliable surrogate biomarker of colorectal cancer. This prospective study explored the chemopreventive effect of an LTRA on colonic ACF formation and the safety of the medicine in patients as a pilot trial leading to a colorectal cancer chemoprevention trial. This was a nonrandomized, open-label, controlled trial in patients with colorectal ACFs. The participants were allocated to LTRA or observation groups. Patients in the LTRA group received 10 mg of montelukast orally daily for 8 weeks. After the intervention, colonoscopy was performed to evaluate the changes in the number of ACFs. From November 2017 to March 2020, 40 patients were enrolled. The first 30 were assigned to the LTRA group, and the remaining 10 were assigned to the observation group. In the LTRA group, the mean change in the number of ACFs per patient at 8 weeks from baseline was −2.4 ± 2.2, while the mean change in the observation group was 0.4 ± 2.3 (P = 0.002). There were no severe adverse events. This is the first study to explore the effect of LTRAs against colorectal ACF formation in humans. LTRAs are potential candidates for chemoprevention in colorectal cancer. Prevention Relevance: We conducted the first LTRA chemoprevention trial for human rectal ACFs, which is considered a surrogate marker of colorectal carcinogenesis. 8-week treatment with LTRA suppressed ACF formation and cell proliferation in colonic epithelium. LTRAs are possible candidates for chemoprevention in colorectal cancer. See related Spotlight, p. 637

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in patients with chronic constipation (CC) or irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS‐C) who did not respond to treatment with magnesium oxide (MgO).Methods: This study was designed as a multicenter, open‐label, single‐arm, exploratory study. Patients with CC or IBS‐C who took MgO and those meeting the medication initiation criteria were administered linaclotide at a daily dosage of 500 μg for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in the Japanese version of the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (JPAC‐QOL) score from baseline, which was evaluated by using a paired t‐test.Key Results: The patients' mean age (± standard deviation) was 67.6 ± 13.82 years. The full analysis set included 61 patients. The JPAC‐QOL total score was 1.60 at baseline and 0.70 at 12 weeks, with a significant mean change of −0.89 ± 0.721 (p < 0.001). Several secondary endpoints also showed improvement. The frequency of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) and complete SBM increased by 2.70 ± 7.254 (p < 0.01) and 2.81 ± 5.254 times, respectively (p < 0.001). The Bristol Stool Form Scale, abdominal bloating severity, and straining severity scores improved by 1.33 ± 1.274 (p < 0.001), −0.16 ± 0.563 (p < 0.05), and −0.46 ± 0.795 (p < 0.001) points, respectively. The safety analysis set included 65 patients, 7 of whom had diarrhea, which improved with dose reduction and drug withdrawal.Conclusion & Inferences: The study was conducted in an older adult population, similar to real clinical practice. Linaclotide may be an option for treating CC that shows an inadequate response to conventional therapy.