Douglas B Johnson

Dr. Douglas B Johnson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 January 2022 in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DJDouglas B Johnson
Douglas B Johnson
CNCaroline A. Nebhan
Caroline A. Nebhan
JMJavid J. Moslehi
Javid J. Moslehi
JBJustin M. Balko
Justin M. Balko

1 March 2018 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJavid J Moslehi
Javid J Moslehi
JSJoe-Elie Salem
Joe-Elie Salem
JSJeffrey A Sosman
Jeffrey A Sosman
BLBénédicte Lebrun-Vignes
Bénédicte Lebrun-Vignes
DJDouglas B Johnson
Douglas B Johnson

1 February 2016 in JAMA Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DJDouglas B Johnson
Douglas B Johnson
RSRyan J. Sullivan
Ryan J. Sullivan
POPatrick A. Ott
Patrick A. Ott
MCMatteo S. Carlino
Matteo S. Carlino
NKNikhil I. Khushalani
Nikhil I. Khushalani
JCJoseph I. Clark
Joseph I. Clark
Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) that induces antitumor immune responses by removing a key negative regulator of T cell activation. This antibody was the first agent to demonstrate improved overall survival for patients with advanced melanoma and received regulatory approval in 2011.1,2 Furthermore, durable benefits have been observed, with approximately 20% of patients surviving at least 5 years.3,4

2 October 2023 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRachel S. Goodman
Rachel S. Goodman
JPJ. Randall Patrinely
J. Randall Patrinely
CSCosby A. Stone
Cosby A. Stone
EZEli Zimmerman
Eli Zimmerman
RDRebecca R. Donald
Rebecca R. Donald
DJDouglas B Johnson
Douglas B Johnson
Importance: Natural language processing tools, such as ChatGPT (generative pretrained transformer, hereafter referred to as chatbot), have the potential to radically enhance the accessibility of medical information for health professionals and patients. Assessing the safety and efficacy of these tools in answering physician-generated questions is critical to determining their suitability in clinical settings, facilitating complex decision-making, and optimizing health care efficiency.Objective: To assess the accuracy and comprehensiveness of chatbot-generated responses to physician-developed medical queries, highlighting the reliability and limitations of artificial intelligence–generated medical information.Design, Setting, and Participants: Thirty-three physicians across 17 specialties generated 284 medical questions that they subjectively classified as easy, medium, or hard with either binary (yes or no) or descriptive answers. The physicians then graded the chatbot-generated answers to these questions for accuracy (6-point Likert scale with 1 being completely incorrect and 6 being completely correct) and completeness (3-point Likert scale, with 1 being incomplete and 3 being complete plus additional context). Scores were summarized with descriptive statistics and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis test. The study (including data analysis) was conducted from January to May 2023.Main Outcomes and Measures: Accuracy, completeness, and consistency over time and between 2 different versions (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) of chatbot-generated medical responses.Results: Across all questions (n = 284) generated by 33 physicians (31 faculty members and 2 recent graduates from residency or fellowship programs) across 17 specialties, the median accuracy score was 5.5 (IQR, 4.0-6.0) (between almost completely and complete correct) with a mean (SD) score of 4.8 (1.6) (between mostly and almost completely correct). The median completeness score was 3.0 (IQR, 2.0-3.0) (complete and comprehensive) with a mean (SD) score of 2.5 (0.7). For questions rated easy, medium, and hard, the median accuracy scores were 6.0 (IQR, 5.0-6.0), 5.5 (IQR, 5.0-6.0), and 5.0 (IQR, 4.0-6.0), respectively (mean [SD] scores were 5.0 [1.5], 4.7 [1.7], and 4.6 [1.6], respectively; P = .05). Accuracy scores for binary and descriptive questions were similar (median score, 6.0 [IQR, 4.0-6.0] vs 5.0 [IQR, 3.4-6.0]; mean [SD] score, 4.9 [1.6] vs 4.7 [1.6]; P = .07). Of 36 questions with scores of 1.0 to 2.0, 34 were requeried or regraded 8 to 17 days later with substantial improvement (median score 2.0 [IQR, 1.0-3.0] vs 4.0 [IQR, 2.0-5.3]; P < .01). A subset of questions, regardless of initial scores (version 3.5), were regenerated and rescored using version 4 with improvement (mean accuracy [SD] score, 5.2 [1.5] vs 5.7 [0.8]; median score, 6.0 [IQR, 5.0-6.0] for original and 6.0 [IQR, 6.0-6.0] for rescored; P = .002).Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, chatbot generated largely accurate information to diverse medical queries as judged by academic physician specialists with improvement over time, although it had important limitations. Further research and model development are needed to correct inaccuracies and for validation.

29 January 2016 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DJDouglas B Johnson
Douglas B Johnson
MEMonica V. Estrada
Monica V. Estrada
RSRoberto Salgado
Roberto Salgado
VSVioleta Sanchez
Violeta Sanchez
DDDeon B. Doxie
Deon B. Doxie
JBJustin M. Balko
Justin M. Balko
Anti-PD-1 therapy yields objective clinical responses in 30–40% of advanced melanoma patients. Since most patients do not respond, predictive biomarkers to guide treatment selection are needed. We hypothesize that MHC-I/II expression is required for tumour antigen presentation and may predict anti-PD-1 therapy response. In this study, across 60 melanoma cell lines, we find bimodal expression patterns of MHC-II, while MHC-I expression was ubiquitous. A unique subset of melanomas are capable of expressing MHC-II under basal or IFNγ-stimulated conditions. Using pathway analysis, we show that MHC-II(+) cell lines demonstrate signatures of ‘PD-1 signalling’, ‘allograft rejection’ and ‘T-cell receptor signalling’, among others. In two independent cohorts of anti-PD-1-treated melanoma patients, MHC-II positivity on tumour cells is associated with therapeutic response, progression-free and overall survival, as well as CD4+and CD8+tumour infiltrate. MHC-II+tumours can be identified by melanoma-specific immunohistochemistry using commercially available antibodies for HLA-DR to improve anti-PD-1 patient selection.

19 April 2021 in Nature Reviews Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJordan J. Wright
Jordan J. Wright
APAlvin C. Powers
Alvin C. Powers
DJDouglas B Johnson
Douglas B Johnson