Hyperbilirubinemia is frequently reported in trauma patients. However, few studies have investigated the effects of hyperbilirubinemia on patients’ clinical trajectories. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between hyperbilirubinemia and patient outcomes following trauma. Our study included 387 patients who were admitted to the trauma bay with severe trauma between January 2017 and December 2021. We categorized patients into two groups based on their peak bilirubin levels: the low-bilirubin (LB) group, with levels below 3 mg/dL, and the high-bilirubin (HB) group, with levels above 3 mg/dL. We then compared the rates of complications and mortality between these two groups. The incidence of pneumonia (10.8% vs. 32.3%, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (AKI) (2.8% vs. 19.2%, p < 0.001), sepsis (2.8% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.003), and wound infections (8.3% vs. 30.3%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the HB group. Additionally, the mortality rate was significantly higher (4.2% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.028) in the HB group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the higher the bilirubin level, the greater the risk of complications (pneumonia: odds ratio [OR] = 3.238; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.68–6.22; p < 0.001, AKI: OR = 4.718; 95% CI = 1.65–13.44; p = 0.004, sepsis: OR = 3.087; 95% CI = 1.00–9.52; p = 0.04, wound infection: OR = 3.995; 95% CI = 2.073–7.700; p < 0.001). In conclusion, hyperbilirubinemia was associated with poorer outcomes in trauma patients.

Tae Kyoo Lim, M.D., Byug Chul Yu, M.D., Dae Sung Ma, M.D., Gil Jae Lee, M.D., Min A Lee, M.D., Sung Yeol Hyun, M.D., Ph.D, Yang Bin Jeon, M.D., Ph.D, Kang Kook Choi, M.D.. Journal of Trauma and Injury 2017;30:140-4. https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2017.30.4.140

Background/Objectives: The Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) is used to predict in-hospital mortality in geriatric patients with trauma. However, its applicability to elderly patients with multiple traumas and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the GTOS in elderly patients with multiple traumas and TBI and assess its performance in patients with mild and severe TBI. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1283 geriatric multiple trauma patients (aged ≥ 65 years) treated at a regional trauma center from 2019 to 2023. Patients were stratified into mild (head Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] ≤ 3) and severe (head AIS ≥ 4) TBI groups. GTOS values were calculated for each patient, and predicted mortality was compared with in-hospital mortality. GTOS predictive accuracy was assessed by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Patients had a median Injury Severity Score of 18 (interquartile range: 10–25); 33.3% of patients received red blood cell transfusions within 24 h. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 17.9%; GTOS predicted a mortality rate of 17.6% ± 0.17. The GTOS accurately predicted the in-hospital mortality in the entire cohort, achieving an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.798. Predictive accuracy diminished for patients with severe TBI (AUC = 0.657), underestimating actual mortality (39.5% vs. 28.8% predicted). Conclusions: While the GTOS remains a useful tool for predicting in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with multiple traumas, it consistently underestimates mortality risk in those with severe TBI. Therefore, applying the GTOS in this patient subgroup warrants careful consideration.

Background/Objectives: Laparoscopic surgery plays a central role in the management of abdominal trauma, particularly in patients with hemodynamic stability. Recently, single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) has emerged as a technique that further reduces access-related trauma while preserving the benefits of conventional laparoscopy. Thus, this review aimed to examine the current landscape of SPLS in trauma care, summarizing available clinical data and highlighting practical considerations for its use. Despite the limited experience, early evidence suggests that SPLS can achieve diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes comparable to those achieved by multi-port approaches in selected cases. Particular attention is given to a hybrid method that combines intracorporeal assessment with extracorporeal small bowel examination and repair through a single umbilical incision. This technique offers a pragmatic balance between thorough exploration and minimal invasiveness. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar through December 2023 using the terms “single-port laparoscopy”, “single-incision laparoscopic surgery”, “trauma laparoscopy”, and related phrases. Case reports, case series, comparative studies, and reviews describing single-incision laparoscopic surgery in trauma were included in this narrative analysis. Results: SPLS may offer advantages in terms of postoperative pain, wound complications, and cosmetic outcomes, especially in younger patients. As familiarity with the approach increases and dedicated instrumentation becomes more accessible, its role in trauma protocols may expand. Conclusions: Further prospective research is needed to define long-term outcomes, refine patient selection, and integrate SPLS more systematically into trauma care protocols.

The COVID-19 pandemic, starting in 2020, changed the daily activities of people in the world and it might also affect patterns of major trauma. This study aimed to compare the epidemiology and outcomes of trauma patients before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. This was a retrospective study, conducted in a single regional trauma center in Korea, and patients were grouped as pre- and post-COVID-19 and compared in terms of demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes. A total of 4585 patients were included in the study and the mean age was 57.60 ± 18.55 and 59.06 ± 18.73 years in the pre- and post-COVID-19 groups, respectively. The rate of elderly patients (age ≥ 65) significantly increased in the post-COVID-19 group. In terms of injury patterns, self-harm was significantly increased after COVID-19 (2.6% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.021). Mortality, hospital length of stay, 24 h, and transfusion volume were not significantly different. Among the major complications, acute kidney injury, surgical wound infection, pneumonia, and sepsis were significantly different between the groups. This study revealed changes in the age of patients, injury patterns and severity, and major complication rates after the COVID-19 outbreak.

Background/Objectives: Trauma remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, significantly affecting younger and aging populations. The regional trauma center establishment in South Korea in 2014 marked a pivotal advancement in the national trauma care system. This study reviews data from the Incheon Regional Trauma Center, analyzing patient demographics, injury mechanisms, and outcome trends. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 32,025 patients with trauma treated at the Incheon Regional Trauma Center from 2014 to 2023. Data from the Korean Trauma Database included demographics, injury mechanisms, Injury Severity Scores (ISSs), and outcomes. We considered the initial treatment setting in our analysis to evaluate its potential impact on patient outcomes. Patients were stratified into four ISS categories and five age groups (0–12, 13–19, 20–64, 65–79, and ≥80 years). Statistical comparisons used chi-square tests and analysis of variance. Results: The proportion of older patients (≥65 years) increased significantly from 23.3% in 2014 to 45.2% in 2023, with patients aged ≥ 80 years showing the highest rise and mortality (6.7%). Traffic accidents decreased from 30.7% to 28.2%, while slip injuries increased from 26.9% to 34.0%. Patients with ISSs > 15 increased, peaking in 2022 (mortality, 15.6%). Despite improved trauma care infrastructure, the overall mortality rate reached 5.9% in 2022, possibly due to more complex cases and an aging population. Conclusions: This study highlights evolving challenges in trauma care due to demographic shifts and rising injury severity. These findings underscore the need for tailored geriatric trauma care, improved infrastructure, and targeted interventions for high-risk groups. Further research is needed to optimize trauma systems and address the growing burden of geriatric trauma.