Hyperkalemia is a common clinical problem with potentially fatal consequences. The prevalence of hyperkalemia is increasing, partially due to wide-scale utilization of prognostically beneficial medications that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAASi). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is one of the multitude of risk factors for and associations with hyperkalemia. Reductions in urinary potassium excretion that occur in CKD can lead to an inability to maintain potassium homeostasis. In CKD patients, there are a variety of strategies to tackle acute and chronic hyperkalemia, including protecting myocardium from arrhythmias, shifting potassium into cells, increasing potassium excretion from the body, addressing dietary intake and treating associated conditions, which may exacerbate problems such as metabolic acidosis. The evidence base is variable but has recently been supplemented with the discovery of novel oral potassium binders, which have shown promise and efficacy in studies. Their use is likely to become widespread and offers another tool to the clinician treating hyperkalemia. Our review article provides an overview of hyperkalemia in CKD patients, including an exploration of relevant guidelines and nuances around management.

Assessment in African populations suggest adjustment for ethnicity in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations derived from African Americans lead to overestimation of GFR and failure to determine severity in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, studies in African Europeans are limited. We aimed to assess accuracy of eGFR equations, with and without ethnicity adjustment compared with measured GFR in people of Black ethnicity in the United Kingdom. Performance of MDRD, CKD-EPI (with and without ethnicity adjustment), Full Age Spectrum (FAS), revised Lund Malmö (LM Revised), and European Kidney Function Consortium (EKFC) eGFR equations were assessed compared to ⁵¹Cr-EDTA GFR studies extracted from hospital databases. Participants with albumin <30g/l, liver disease, <18 years, of non-Black or non-White self-reported ethnicity were excluded. Agreement was assessed by bias, precision and 30%-accuracy and was stratified for ethnicity and GFR. 1888 ⁵¹Cr-EDTA studies were included (Mean age-53.7yrs; 43.6% female; 14.1% Black ethnicity). Compared to White participants, eGFR-MDRD and eGFR-CKD-EPI equations in Black participants significantly overestimated GFR (bias 20.3 and 19.7 ml/min/1.73m² respectively, p<0.001). Disregarding the ethnicity adjustment significantly improved GFR estimates for Black participants (bias 6.7 and 2.4ml/min/1.73m² for eGFR-MDRD and eGFR-CKD-EPI respectively, p<0.001). The LM Revised equation had the smallest bias for both White and Black participants (5.8ml and -1.1ml/min/1.73m² respectively). 30%-accuracy was superior for GFR≥60ml/min/1.73m² compared to <60ml/min/1.73m² using eGFR-CKD-EPI equation for both White and Black participants (p<0.001). Multivariate regression methodology with adjustment for age, sex and log(serum creatinine) in the cohort yielded an ethnicity coefficient of 1.018 (95% CI: 1.009–1.027). Overestimation of measured GFR with eGFR equations using ethnicity adjustment factors may lead to reduced CKD diagnosis and under-recognition of severity in people of Black ethnicity. Our findings suggest that ethnicity adjustment for GFR estimation in non-African Americans may not be appropriate for use in people of Black ethnicity in the UK.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) poses a significant global health challenge with increasing prevalence and associated morbidity. Point-of-care testing (POCT) provides an opportunity to improve CKD management and outcomes through early detection and targeted interventions, particularly in underserved communities. This review evaluates the roles of POCT in CKD, focusing on utility (through screening programs, monitoring of kidney function, and assessing participants on renally excreted medications), accuracy, and acceptability. Screening programs employing POCT have demonstrated promising outcomes, with improved rates of CKD diagnosis in groups with disparate health outcomes, offering a vital avenue for early intervention in high-risk populations. These have been conducted in rural and urban community or pharmacy settings, highlighting convenience and accessibility as important facilitators for participants. In addition, POCT holds significant promise in the monitoring of CKD, particularly in groups requiring frequent testing, such as kidney transplant recipients and patients on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. The consideration of the variable analytical performance of different devices remains crucial in assessing the utility of a POCT intervention for CKD. While the convenience and improved accessibility of home self-testing versus healthcare professional management is important, it must be balanced with acceptable levels of accuracy and precision to maintain patient and clinical confidence. Despite challenges including variability in accuracy and the user-friendliness of devices, patient feedback has generally remained positive, with studies reporting increased patient satisfaction and engagement. However, challenges regarding wider uptake are limited by healthcare professional confidence (in test reliability), the potential for increased workload, and early prohibitive costs. In conclusion, POCT represents a growing and valuable tool in enhancing CKD care, particularly in resource-limited settings, but careful consideration of device selection and implementation strategies is essential to achieve desired outcomes.

A welcome step with the potential to reduce health inequalities

Accurate diagnosis, classification and risk stratification for chronic kidney disease (CKD) allow for early recognition and delivering optimal care. Creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urinary albumin: creatinine ratio (UACR) and the kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) are important tools to achieve this, but understanding their limitations is important for optimal implementation. When accurate GFR is required (eg, chemotherapy dosing), GFR is measured using an exogenous filtration marker. In routine clinical practice, in contrast, estimated GFR (eGFR) from serum creatinine (SCr), calculated using the enzymatic method±UACR, is recommended. Limitations of SCr include non-GFR determinants such as muscle mass, diet and tubular handling. An alternative or additional endogenous filtration marker is cystatin C, which can be used alongside SCr for confirmatory testing of CKD. However, its role in the UK is more limited due to concerns regarding false positive results. The recommended creatinine-based eGFR equation in the UK is the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration 2009 equation. This was recently updated to a race-neutral 2021 version and demonstrated reduced bias in people of Black ethnicity, but has not been validated in the UK. Limitations are extremes of age, inaccuracy at greater GFRs and reduced generalisability to under-represented ethnicity groups. The KFRE (based on age, sex, SCr and UACR) has recently been developed to help determine 2-year and 5-year risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease. It has been validated in over 30 countries and provides meaningful quantitative information to patients. However, supporting evidence for their performance in ethnic minority groups and kidney diseases such as glomerulonephritis remains modest. In conclusion, early identification, risk stratification of kidney disease and timely intervention are important to impact kidney disease progression. However, clinician awareness of the limitations and variability of creatinine, cystatin C and the eGFR equations, is key to appropriate interpretation of results.

Background: Hyperkalaemia with metabolic acidosis is common but under-reported following kidney transplantation. Calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus, are widely used in the management of transplant patients and are associated with the development of hyperkalaemia. We report on 10 renal transplant patients, treated with fludrocortisone, following identification of hyperkalaemic metabolic acidosis. Results: All 10 patients were male aged (mean ± SD) 53.0 ± 13.2 years; 7 were Caucasian and 3 South Asian. Before and after fludrocortisone administration, respective (mean ± SD) serum potassium was 6.1 ± 0.4 mmol/L and 5.3 ± 0.3 mmol/L (p = 0.0002); serum bicarbonate 18.5 ± 1.6 mmol/L and 20.5 ± 2.3 mmol/L (p = 0.002); serum sodium 135 ± 4.6 mmol/L and 137 ± 2.2 mmol/L (p = 0.0728); serum creatinine 181 ± 61 μmol/L and 168 ± 64 μmol/L (p = 0.1318); eGFR 42 ± 18 mL/min and 46 ± 18 mL/min (p = 0.0303); blood tacrolimus 10.1 ± 2.9 ng/mL and 10.4 ± 1.4 ng/mL (p = 0.7975); and blood pressure 129 ± 15/79 ± 25 mm Hg and 126 ± 24/75 ± 7 mm Hg. Pre-fludrocortisone, there were 7 episodes of serum potassium ≥6.5 mEq/L, with 4 patients requiring admission for the treatment of hyperkalaemia. Following fludrocortisone, no patients had hyperkalaemia requiring inpatient management. Conclusions: Treatment of hyperkalaemic metabolic acidosis in transplant patients on tacrolimus with low-dose fludrocortisone resulted in rapid correction of hyperkalaemia and acidosis without significant effects on blood pressure or serum sodium. Fludrocortisone can be an effective short-term option for the treatment of hyperkalaemic metabolic acidosis in kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus; however, patient selection remains important in order to reduce to risk of potential adverse effects.