Salazar Jones

Dr. Salazar Jones

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2018 in American Journal of Neuroradiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMT.R. Miller
T.R. Miller
MKM.J. Kole
M.J. Kole
ELE.J. Le
E.J. Le
GCGregory Cannarsa
Gregory Cannarsa
SJSalazar Jones
Salazar Jones
DGDheeraj Gandhi
Dheeraj Gandhi
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although covered side branches typically remain patent acutely following Pipeline Embolization Device embolization of intracranial aneurysms, the long-term fate of these vessels remains uncertain. We therefore elected to investigate factors that may influence the long-term patency of these covered side branches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the long-term patency of side branches covered by the Pipeline Embolization Device at our institution during treatment of intracranial aneurysms with at least 6 months of conventional angiography follow-up. Procedural and anatomic factors that might influence the fate of covered side branches were explored. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight Pipeline Embolization Device treatments in 137 patients met the inclusion criteria. In 217 covered side branches, 29 (13.4%) were occluded on follow-up, and 40 (18.4%) were stenotic. All stenoses and occlusions were asymptomatic. In the entire cohort and in the largest subset of ophthalmic arteries, a smaller Pipeline Embolization Device diameter was associated with branch vessel occlusion (P = .001, P = .013). When we considered stenotic and occluded side branches together, smaller Pipeline Embolization Device size (P = .029) and administration of intraprocedural abciximab (P = .03) predicted side branch stenosis/occlusion, while anterior choroidal branch type (P = .003) was a predictor of gross side branch patency. CONCLUSIONS: A smaller Pipeline Embolization Device diameter is associated with delayed side branch stenosis/occlusion following Pipeline Embolization Device treatment, likely due to the higher metal density of smaller caliber devices. Although hemodynamic factors, including the potential for collateral flow, are still paramount in determining the fate of covered side branches, the amount of metal coverage at the side branch orifice also plays an important role.

18 November 2022 in Surgical Neurology International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NNNoah M. Nichols
Noah M. Nichols
AHAshia M. Hackett
Ashia M. Hackett
ACAlejandro Carrasquilla
Alejandro Carrasquilla
PSPaul Solodnik
Paul Solodnik
HBHang Byun
Hang Byun
ZHZachary L. Hickman
Zachary L. Hickman
Background: Beta-thalassemia is an inherited hemoglobinopathy, whereby reduced or absent expression of beta-globin genes causes impaired erythropoiesis. Extramedullary hematopoiesis (EMH) occurs in 1% of all patients with beta-thalassemia major receiving regular transfusions and is exceedingly rare intracranially. Case Description: We report a case of a male in his 20s with beta thalassemia who presented with head trauma found to have intracranial EMH mimicking multiple extra-axial hematomas. Making the correct diagnosis was critical in avoiding prolonged neuromonitoring and unnecessary interventions. Conclusion: Intracranial extramedullary hematopoietic pseudotumor is an exceedingly rare entity and seldom appears in a neurosurgeon’s differential diagnosis. This case illustrates how this condition can easily mimic an acute intracranial hemorrhage in a patient with beta-thalassemia who presents with head trauma. We review the topic to further inform clinicians who may encounter this condition in their practice.

30 September 2024 in Discover Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BEBahie Ezzat
Bahie Ezzat
MLMichael Lemonick
Michael Lemonick
CBCole Brown
Cole Brown
MDMehek Dedhia
Mehek Dedhia
AMAbhishek R. Mogili
Abhishek R. Mogili
ZHZachary L. Hickman
Zachary L. Hickman
Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses a significant public health challenge with profound impacts at individual, family, community, and societal levels. Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, the neighborhood of Elmhurst, Queens in New York City was a hotspot dubbed the “epicenter of the epicenter” of the crisis in the United States, requiring major changes in healthcare resource allocation. This study investigates how different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the incidence, severity, and clinical outcomes of TBI in this geographical area. Methods: TBI admissions to NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, a Level 1 Trauma Center, during the first six months of 2019, 2020, and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Data were grouped into three periods: pre-pandemic (1/1/19–6/30/19 and 1/1/20–2/29/20) [Group 1], first COVID-19 wave (3/1/20–6/30/20) [Group 2], and second COVID-19 wave (1/1/21–6/30/21) [Group 3]. Univariate analyses were conducted to explore factors potentially associated with TBI outcomes; variables that reached statistical significance (p < 0.05) were included in a binary logistic regression analysis dichotomized into good outcome (discharge to home or acute rehabilitation disposition) and poor outcome (discharge to skilled nursing facility/subacute rehabilitation, hospice, or in-hospital mortality). Results: Analysis of 443 TBI patients (median age 56 [range 38, 73]; mean admissions/week 5.6 ± 2.7) demonstrated no significant variance in age (H = 0.92; p = 0.63), sex (χ2 = 1.4, p = 0.51), or ethnicity (χ2 = 17.1; p = 0.07) across groups. Group 2 had significantly fewer weekly admissions (3.9 ± 2.6) compared to Groups 1 (5.9 ± 2.2; p = 0.02) and 3 (6.1 ± 2.9; p = 0.01). Over the course of the pandemic, the proportion of uninsured patients decreased from 15 to 4%, while Medicaid and Medicare coverage rates rose from 25 to 41% and 20% to 28%, respectively (p < 0.001). A binary logistic regression model dichotomized by discharge outcome for all 443 TBI patients confirmed that increasing age (OR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.93–0.97; p < 0.001) and Injury Severity Score (OR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.83–0.93; p < 0.001) were inversely correlated with good outcome, while higher Glasgow Coma Scale (OR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.17–1.36; p < 0.001) was positively correlated. Of particular interest, Black/Hispanic ethnicity (OR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.19–0.66; p = 0.002) and public health insurance (Medicaid/Medicare) coverage (OR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.68–1.00; p = 0.05) were both associated with less favorable outcomes. Neither group designation, patient sex, COVID-19 status, or need for neurosurgical intervention was correlated with outcome (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Despite the changes in TBI admission patterns throughout New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic, the quality of patient outcomes at our institution remained relatively consistent across the pandemic’s different phases, as assessed by discharge disposition. However, two important socioeconomic factors—ethnicity and health insurance status—were significantly associated with outcome, underscoring the need for systemic changes to address ongoing disparities in neurotrauma care.

31 May 2023 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAbdul-Kareem Ahmed
Abdul-Kareem Ahmed
PJPemla Jagtiani
Pemla Jagtiani
SJSalazar Jones
Salazar Jones
Hinge craniotomy for the management of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury remains a technique not widely adopted. The hinged bone flap decreases the allowable intracranial volume expansion, which can lead to persistent post-operative elevated ICP and the need for salvage craniectomy. Herein, we describe the technical nuances in performing a decompressive craniectomy that, when optimized, allows for stronger consideration for hinge craniotomy as a definitive technique. To conclude, hinge craniotomy is a reasonable option in the setting of traumatic brain injury. Trauma neurosurgeons can consider the technical steps to optimize a decompressive craniectomy and perform hinge craniotomy when allowable.

30 April 2025 in Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRami Rajjoub
Rami Rajjoub
ASAlexander J. Schupper
Alexander J. Schupper
SJSalazar Jones
Salazar Jones
Spondylodiscitis is a serious spinal infection that can cause spinal instability, neurologic deficits, and paralysis. Although endoscopic procedures are becoming increasingly common, their role in spondylodiscitis management remains undefined. In this systematic review, PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE were searched for studies published from January 1950 to March 2024 on percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage (PEDD) surgery for spondylodiscitis. The inclusion criteria included clinical trials or case series of spondylodiscitis patients treated with endoscopy. Primary outcomes included culture yield, complications, reoperations, treatment success rates, and pain scores. Our review included 40 studies that assessed 667 patients. Most studies presented low-level evidence, consisting of case reports (40.0%) and case series (60.0%). Endoscopic techniques demonstrated a positive culture yield of 67.3%, with an overall complication rate of 7.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.35%–10.47%) and a reoperation rate of 13.1% (95% CI, 10.08%–16.31%). There were no complications related to cerebrospinal fluid leaks or meningitis. The medical treatment success rate was higher in patients who underwent concurrent instrumentation than in those who received endoscopic debridement alone (96.4% vs. 85.9%, p=0.003). Thirteen studies presented patient-reported pain outcomes, and all cohorts showed improvements. This review suggests that PEDD shows promise as a safe and effective adjunctive treatment for spondylodiscitis, offering low complication rates and successful treatment. PEDD may play a role within a multidisciplinary treatment approach. Future clinical trials are needed to determine whether early PEDD can improve the overall success of medical therapy and reduce the need for more extensive debridement and fusion surgery.

9 September 2024 in Journal of Neurosurgery: Case Lessons
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRami Rajjoub
Rami Rajjoub
MDMehek Dedhia
Mehek Dedhia
SJSalazar Jones
Salazar Jones
BACKGROUND: Emphysematous osteomyelitis (EO) is a rare, rapidly progressing infection characterized by gas within bones, leading to severe morbidity if untreated. In the spine, EO can cause significant bone destruction and instability, requiring urgent surgical and medical intervention. Early diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach are crucial for effective management and improved patient outcomes. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present a unique case of EO involving the lumbar spine in a 40-year-old male patient with a medical history of diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography revealed the formation of gas within the L4 vertebral body and spinal canal, which led to the diagnosis of EO. Blood cultures grew Streptococcus dysgalactiae. The patient underwent laminectomy, discectomy, and vertebral body abscess washout to prevent further spread of the infection and successfully recovered. LESSONS: The authors report the first case of spinal EO caused by S. dysgalactiae, treated using laminectomy with debridement of the affected disc spaces. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24434