Background/Objectives: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a cell-surface glycoprotein serving as a drug target, diagnostic marker, and serum marker for cancer monitoring. However, prevalence data on CEA expression in cancer tissues vary considerably. This study was designed to determine CEA expression in normal and neoplastic tissues. Methods: A tissue microarray containing 13,725 samples from 120 different tumor types, as well as 76 different normal tissue types, was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: CEA was detectable in 65 (54.2%) of 120 tumor categories, including 49 (40.8%) tumor types with at least one strongly positive case. CEA positivity was most common in colorectal adenomas (100%) and carcinomas (98.7%), other gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas (61.1–80.3%), medullary carcinomas of the thyroid (96.3%), pulmonary adenocarcinoma (73.7%), mucinous carcinomas of the ovary (79.8%) and the breast (43.2%), small-cell carcinomas of the lung (64.3%), and urinary bladder (38.9%). CEA overexpression was linked to high tumor grade and invasive growth (p < 0.0001 each) in urinary bladder cancer, and estrogen and HER2 receptor positivity (p ≤ 0.0158) in invasive breast cancer of no special type. In colorectal adenocarcinomas, reduced CEA expression was associated with mismatch repair deficiency (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The comprehensive list of CEA-positive human tumor types demonstrates that CEA is expressed in a broad range of epithelial neoplasms, many of which might benefit from CEA serum monitoring and anti-CEA therapies.

Stimulator of interferon genes protein (STING) activates the immune response in inflammatory cells. STING expression in cancer cells is less well characterized, but STING agonists are currently being evaluated as anticancer drugs. A tissue microarray containing 18,001 samples from 139 different tumor types was analyzed for STING by immunohistochemistry. STING-positive tumor cells were found in 130 (93.5%) of 139 tumor entities. The highest STING positivity rates occurred in squamous cell carcinomas (up to 96%); malignant mesothelioma (88.5%–95.7%); adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (94.9%), lung (90.3%), cervix (90.0%), colorectum (75.2%), and gallbladder (68.8%); and serous high-grade ovarian cancer (86.0%). High STING expression was linked to adverse phenotypes in breast cancer, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and papillary carcinoma of the thyroid (p < 0.05). In pTa urothelial carcinomas, STING expression was associated with low-grade carcinoma (p = 0.0002). Across all tumors, STING expression paralleled PD-L1 positivity of tumor and inflammatory cells (p < 0.0001 each) but was unrelated to the density of CD8+ lymphocytes. STING expression is variable across tumor types and may be related to aggressive tumor phenotype and PD-L1 positivity. The lack of relationship with tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes argues against a significant IFN production by STING positive tumor cells.

Background/Objectives: Trefoil factor 1 (TFF1) plays a role in the mucus barrier. Methods: To evaluate the prevalence of TFF1 expression in cancer, a tissue microarray containing 18,878 samples from 149 tumor types and 608 samples of 76 normal tissue types was analyzed through immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: TFF1 staining was detectable in 65 of 149 tumor categories. The highest rates of TFF1 positivity were found in mucinous ovarian carcinomas (76.2%), colorectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas (47.1–75%), breast neoplasms (up to 72.9%), bilio-pancreatic adenocarcinomas (42.1–62.5%), gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas (40.4–50.0%), neuroendocrine neoplasms (up to 45.5%), cervical adenocarcinomas (39.1%), and urothelial neoplasms (up to 24.3%). High TFF1 expression was related to a low grade of malignancy in non-invasive urothelial carcinomas of the bladder (p = 0.0225), low grade of malignancy (p = 0.0003), estrogen and progesterone receptor expression (p < 0.0001), non-triple negativity (p = 0.0005) in invasive breast cancer of no special type, and right-sided tumor location (p = 0.0021) in colorectal adenocarcinomas. Conclusions: TFF1 IHC has only limited utility for the discrimination of different tumor entities given its expression in many tumor entities. The link between TFF1 expression and parameters of malignancy argues for a relevant biological role of TFF1 in cancer. TFF1 may represent a suitable therapeutic target due to its expression in only a few normal cell types.

Background: The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) regulates the transcription of thousands of genes. In cancer, both oncogenic and tumor suppressive roles of GR have been proposed. Methods: A tissue microarray containing 18,527 samples from 147 tumor (sub-)types and 608 samples from 76 normal tissue types was analyzed for GR expression by immunohistochemistry. Results: GR positivity was found in 76.4% of 14,349 interpretable cancers, including 18.5% with weak, 19.6% with moderate, and 38.3% with strong positivity. GR positivity appeared in all 147 tumor types, with at least one strongly positive tumor in 136 types. Of out tumor entities, 77 of the 147 showed GR positivity in 100% of the cases analyzed. Only six tumor types had less than 50% GR-positive cases, including adenomas with low-/high-grade dysplasia (32.5%/21.7%), adenocarcinomas (17%) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (45.5%) of the colorectum, endometrial carcinomas (25.6%), and rhabdoid tumors (25%). Reduced GR staining was associated with grade progression in pTa (p < 0.0001) and with nodal metastasis in pT2-4 (p = 0.0051) urothelial bladder carcinoma, advanced pT stage (p = 0.0006) in breast carcinomas of no special type (NST), and high grade (p = 0.0066), advanced pT stage (p < 0.0001), and distant metastasis (p = 0.0081) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. GR expression was unrelated to clinico-pathological parameters in gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal adenocarcinoma, and in serous high-grade carcinoma of the ovary. Conclusions: GR expression is frequent across all cancer types. Associations between reduced GR expression and unfavorable tumor features in certain cancers suggest that the functional importance of GR-regulated genes in cancer progression depends on the cell of tumor origin.

Laryngeal cancer, particularly the squamous cell carcinoma subtype, is prevalent all over the world and is characterized by a poor prognosis and high mortality rates. Currently, no definitive prognostic markers exist for predicting the behavior of the tumor. The aim of this study is to examine the correlation between cyclin D1 and E-cadherin expression with some clinicopathological parameters in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). 60 cases of LSCC were retrospectively studied concerning the clinicopathological features and the potential prognostic role of cyclin D1 and E-cadherin expression in laryngeal carcinoma, using immunohistochemical staining scores on paraffin-embedded cancer tissues from patients who were treated with surgical excision. Reduced E-cadherin expression was significantly correlated with tumor grade (p = 0.0288), T stage (p = 0.041), and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.003). Regarding Cyclin D1, a statistically significant correlation was found with lymph node metastasis (p=0.019). In contrast, cyclin D1 expression was not significantly correlated with TNM stage or tumor grade (p=0.99 and 0.66, respectively). Evaluating expression of cyclin D1 in conjunction with E-cadherin expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma may prove beneficial in identifying patients with lymph node metastasis. Tumor grade, stage, and nodal metastasis can significantly affect E-cadherin expression in patients with LSCC. However, further studies using genetic testing are recommended to assess the role of E-cadherin in tumor progression.