Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) represents a heterogenous set of malignancies arising from the biliary tract. Classification of CCA subdivides tumours into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), with eCCA further categorised as perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) lesions. Tumour subtypes show distinct epidemiological, genetic and clinical characteristics. Global incidence and mortality are rising, with the highest rates seen in Asian populations compared to the West. There has been a divergence in recent mortality trends observed between CCA subtypes, with rising rates of iCCA seen compared with eCCA. There are several drivers for these differing trends, including specific risk factors, misclassification of CCA subtypes and variation in diagnosis and surveillance. Risk factors for CCA can be divided into hepatobiliary, extra-hepatic and environmental, with hepatobiliary diseases conferring the largest risk. Surgery represents the only curative treatment for CCA, but can only be offered to early-stage candidates who are otherwise fit; the majority of patients are therefore treated with chemotherapy and, recently, immunotherapy. Due to late-stage presentation of disease, prognosis is poor, with 5-year survival <20%.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prognosis remains dismal due to late-stage diagnosis; surveillance has been demonstrated to increase early diagnosis rates and receipt of curative treatment. Acknowledging limitations in the evidence base for HCC surveillance, international professional bodies reiterate the recommendation for biannual HCC surveillance and NHS England supports measures aimed to increase surveillance uptake. The current ad hoc provision of HCC surveillance is prone to failures, evident by low surveillance uptake and high numbers of patients being diagnosed outside of surveillance. We discuss challenges related to HCC surveillance in the UK and potential solutions to addressing them. We highlight the requirements of a consistent and effective national surveillance process, and suggest pathways on how this can be achieved.

Background: Biannual ultrasound (US) is recommended for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. However, US has limited sensitivity for early-stage HCC, particularly in overweight cohorts, where hepatic visualisation is often inadequate. Currently there are no robust imaging surveillance strategies in patients with inadequate US visualisation. We investigated the ability of non-contrast, abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (aMRI) to adequately visualise the liver for HCC surveillance in patients with previously inadequate US. Methods: Patients undergoing US surveillance, where liver visualisation was inadequate (LI-RADS VIS-B and VIS-C), were prospectively recruited. Patients underwent non-contrast T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted aMRI. The images were reviewed and reported by an expert liver radiologist. Three independent, blinded radiologists assessed the aMRI visualisation quality using a binary score assessing five parameters (parenchymal definition, vascular definition, coverage of the liver, uniformity of liver appearance and signal-to-noise ratio). Results: Thirty patients completed the aMRI protocol. The majority (90%) had underlying cirrhosis and were overweight (93.3%), with 50% obese and 20% severely obese. A total of 93.3% of the aMRI scans were of satisfactory quality. Six patients (20%) had hepatic abnormalities detected with aMRI that were not seen on their US: one HCC, one haemangioma and three clinically insignificant lesions. For the aMRI visualisation quality assessment, the coverage of the liver, vascular definition and parenchymal definition were consistently rated to be of sufficient quality by all three radiologists. Conclusions: Non-contrast aMRI provided good visualisation of the liver and detection of abnormalities in patients with inadequate US. aMRI should be further explored in a larger, prospective study as an alternative surveillance strategy in patients with inadequate US.

Background and Aims: Six-monthly ultrasound surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is recommended in patients with cirrhosis. Surveillance enhances early detection and improves survival. Yet, despite clear benefits, uptake remains low. We aim to identify and explore ways to overcome patient-related barriers to HCC surveillance with the aim of producing invitations for surveillance. Methods: Using the COM-B model of behaviour and a co-design process, we collaborated with patients, liver health charities and advocacy groups, to identify patient-related barriers to attending HCC surveillance. We performed qualitative thematic analysis of co-production workshops on HCC surveillance to develop information leaflets and surveillance invitations. Results: Twenty-eight participants attended five workshops. Fear of a serious diagnosis and stigma from healthcare professionals were highlighted as main patient-related barriers to attending surveillance appointments. Co-design was used to develop informative, user-friendly, non-judgemental invitations and information regarding HCC surveillance relevant to populations with cirrhosis. Conclusion: We identified potential patient barriers to surveillance uptake and developed patient facing material that directly addressed these barriers to be trialled in the clinic. Targeting patient-specific barriers may increase uptake of surveillance and therefore enhance early diagnosis. Plain Language Summary: Ultrasound surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is recommended for those with chronic liver disease, but surveillance uptake remains low. Fear and concern about stigma from healthcare professionals are widespread and act as barriers to surveillance attendance. Through a co-design process, we designed invitations to surveillance alongside informational material, aiming to address the self-reported barriers and motivators to surveillance attendance.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a rapidly growing cause of cancer-related deaths in the UK, with early detection being critical for improving survival rates. Despite clear guidelines recommending 6-monthly surveillance for at-risk populations, participation remains low, with an estimated 20% of eligible patients attending regular surveillance. This guidance outlines the minimum standards for delivering effective HCC surveillance, emphasising the need for integrated patient tracking, digital call-recall systems and a multifaceted approach to engagement. Combining ultrasound with serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) improves detection rates, though AFP alone is insufficient due to its variability. The recommendations aim to increase surveillance adherence, enhance early diagnosis and ultimately improve outcomes for patients at risk of HCC.