Background: This in vitro study aimed to investigate and evaluate the values of water sorption and water solubility of four types of denture base polymers—3D-printed NextDent 3D Denture + (NextDent, 3D Systems, Soesterberg, The Netherlands), CAD/CAM milled Ivotion Base (Ivotion Denture System, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), PMMA conventional Vertex BasiQ 20 (Vertex Dental, 3D Systems, Soesterberg, The Netherlands), and conventional heat-cured BMS (BMS Dental Srl, Rome, Italy)—which were subjected to artificial aging. Materials and methods: 200 specimens were created (n = 50), dried, and weighed accurately. They were immersed in artificial saliva (T1 = 7 days, T2 = 14 days, T3 = 1 month) and re-weighed after water absorption. After desiccation at 37 °C for 24 h and then at 23 ± 1 °C for 1 h, samples were weighed again. Next, thermocycling (100 h, 5000 cycles, 5–55 °C) was performed, and the water sorption and solubility were re-measured. IBM SPSS Statistics 0.26 was used for data analysis, revealing a direct correlation between water sorption and material type. Thermocycling at 55 °C increased water sorption for BMS and Vertex BasiQ 20. In conclusion, NextDent’s 3D-printed resin had higher water sorption values throughout the study. Water solubility averages decreased over time, reaching the lowest in the 30-day period for CAD/CAM milled dental resin Ivotion Base. The artificial aging had no effect on Ivotion Base and NextDent’s water sorption. Thermocycling did not affect the solubility of the materials tested. The conducted study acknowledges the great possibilities of dental resins for additive and subtractive manufacturing for the purposes of removable prosthetics in daily dental practice.

Modern media often portray CAD/CAM technology as widely utilized in the fabrication of dental prosthetics. This study presents a comparative analysis of the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) polymers and conventional polymers commonly utilized in prosthetic dentistry. With the increasing adoption of CAD/CAM technology in dental laboratories and practices, understanding the differences in material properties is crucial for informed decision-making in prosthodontic treatment planning. Through a narrative review of the literature and empirical data, this study evaluates the mechanical strength, durability, esthetics, and biocompatibility of CAD/CAM polymers in comparison to traditional polymers. Furthermore, it examines the implications of these findings on the clinical outcomes and long-term success of prosthetic restorations. The results provide valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of CAD/CAM polymers, informing clinicians and researchers about their suitability for various dental prosthetic applications. This study underscores the considerable advantages of CAD/CAM polymers over conventional ones in terms of mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and esthetics for prosthetic dentistry. CAD/CAM technology offers improved mechanical strength and durability, potentially enhancing the long-term performance of dental prosthetics, while the biocompatibility of these polymers makes them suitable for a broad patient demographic, reducing the risk of adverse reactions. The practical implications of these findings for dental technicians and dentists are significant, as understanding these material differences enables tailored treatment planning to meet individual patient needs and preferences. Integration of CAD/CAM technology into dental practices can lead to more predictable outcomes and heightened patient satisfaction with prosthetic restorations.

A common challenge encountered with both traditional and digitally produced dentures involves the extraction of artificial teeth from the denture base. This narrative review seeks to present an updated perspective on the adherence of synthetic teeth for denture base materials, employing diverse methods. Dental technicians often employ chemical approaches and mechanical techniques (including abrasion, laser treatment, and abrasive blasting) to augment the retention of denture teeth. However, the efficacy of these treatments remains uncertain. In certain instances, specific combinations of Denture Base Resin (DBR) materials and artificial teeth exhibit improved performance in conventional heat-cured dentures following these treatments. The primary reasons for failure are attributed to material incompatibility and inadequate copolymerization. As new denture fabrication techniques and materials continue to emerge, further research is imperative to identify optimal tooth-DBR combinations. Notably, 3D-printed tooth–DBR combinations have demonstrated reduced bond strength and less favorable failure patterns, while utilizing milled and traditional combinations appears to be a more prudent choice until advancements in additive manufacturing enhance the reliability of 3D-printing methods.