The purpose of our study was to detect early clinical and laboratory signs that help to discriminate macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) from active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) without MAS.Our retrospective study was based on reviewing the medical charts of the children admitted to the rheumatology department with active SJIA and definite MAS (n = 18) and without MAS (n = 40). We evaluated the data related to SJIA and MAS at the moment of the patient׳s admission. If the patient had signs of MAS since admission or developed definite MAS later during this flare, he was referred to the main group. The children who did not have MAS during the flare episode and did not have MAS in the past medical history were in the control group. We calculated the cutoff points for MAS parameters, performed the analysis of sensitivity and specificity, identified the predictors, and provided the preliminary diagnostic rule through "the-number-of-criteria-present" approach.The clinical signs were relevant to MAS in SJIA: oligoarticular disease course (OR = 5.6), splenomegaly (OR = 67.6), hemorrhages (OR = 33.0), and respiratory failure (OR = 11.3). The involvement of wrist (OR = 0.2), MCP (OR = 0.1), and PIP joints (OR = 0.1) was protective against MAS development. The best cutoffs for laboratory parameters were PLT ≤ 211 × 10(9)/l, WBC ≤ 9.9 × 10(9)/l, AST > 59.7U/l, LDH > 882U/l, albumin ≤ 2.9g/dl, ferritin > 400μg/l, fibrinogen ≤ 1.8g/l, and proteinuria. The laboratory variables were more precise in the discrimination of early MAS than clinical: any 3 or more laboratory criteria provided the highest specificity (1.0) and sensitivity (1.0) and OR = 2997.We detected clinical and laboratory markers and created preliminary diagnostic (laboratory) guidelines for early discrimination of MAS in active SJIA.

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SoJIA) is the most striking form of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical responses and outcomes of children with SoJIA to IL-6 blockade using two different tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment protocols designed for milder and more severe SoJIA patient groups, and evaluate the possibility of achieving biologic-free remission.

Systemic corticosteroids are continued to be administered in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients, especially in systemic JIA (sJIA), despite the ability of biologic therapy. One of the complications of long-term CS treatment is delayed hip arthritis development with risk of secondary hip osteoarthritis formation and total hip arthroplasty (THA).We compared different types of hip joint lesions in JIA, especially, secondary hip osteoarthritis development and THA rates in systemic and non-systemic JIA, and evaluate systemic corticosteroids contribution to those complications.The study included 753 JIA patients. They were divided into 2 groups: patients with sJIA and non-systemic JIA (nsJIA). Clinical and demographic characteristics, CS treatment regimens were compared.Results. Hip arthritis was found equally often in both groups, but both secondary hip osteoarthritis (19% vs 5,3%) and THA (8.6% vs 1.6%) prevailed in the sJIA. Patients with sJIA had delayed hip involvement (57.9% vs 30.6%; p=0.019), earlier secondary hip osteoarthritis development (4.5 vs 5.1 years after the JIA onset) with younger age of secondary hip osteoarthritis achievement (13.7 vs 15.2 years; р=0.045), they also had higher inflammatory activity, greater systemic corticosteroids administration (94.8% vs 56.1%; р=0.0000001) and higher cumulative systemic corticosteroids dose (3085 mg vs 2000 mg; p=0,005). More than half patients (56.1%) with nsJIA had systemic corticosteroids treatment and impaired calcium-phosphorus metabolism.Conclusion. Systemic corticosteroid treatment and delayed hip involvement are independent predictors of secondary hip osteoarthritis in all JIA categories. Calcium and phosphate metabolism disturbances are additional predictor for secondary hip osteoarthritis in non-systemic JIA categories

Systemic lupus erythematosus is an immunopathological disease which is characterized by a poor prognosis. Biologics applied in the disease treatment allow reducing the corticosteroid toxicity and controlling the disease.Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab therapy in children with systemic lupus erythematosus.Material and methods. The retrospective study included data of 48 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with rituximab. Systemic lupus erythematosus was diagnosed based on the SLICC classification criteria. Patients were assessed at baseline disease status, at the time of rituximab initiation and follow-up. The indications for the rituximab were: lupus nephritis, CNS involvement, and hematological involvement resistant to the standard therapy, and in cases of severe corticosteroid toxicity.Results. During rituximab therapy the significant decrease of the SELENA–SLEDAI activity index was observed. There was a significant decrease of the level of antibodies against dsDNA, normalization of the levels of hemoglobin, ESR, complement C4. The proportion of patients with cytopenia decreased up to their complete absence in patients receiving therapy for three years. The number of patients with active lupus nephritis decreased from 16 at the time of rituximab initiation to 1 after 3 years of therapy. Significant dynamics of proteinuria and hematuria was noted, except for 1 patient. The daily dose of corticosteroids was reduced by 90% from baseline in patients treated for 3 years. Serious adverse events included three deaths in patients with high systemic lupus erythematosus activity with uncontrolled macrophage activation syndrome associated with infections. Various infectious complications, hypogammaglobulinemia, which required replacement therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin, were also recorded.Conclusion. Rituximab can be considered as an option for the treatment of severe forms of systemic lupus erythematosus which are resistant to standard therapy. Further studies are required to evaluate efficacy and safety.