From The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry:

Technical assistance (TA) is a major capacity building strategy used by the government sector to promote health outcomes in the United States. However, there is minimal literature about how to develop TA provider capacities. This article describes a systematic and proactive approach for developing TA provider capacity, referred to as Technical Assistance for Technical Assistance Providers (TAFTAP), which draws on three implementation science frameworks (Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, Getting To Outcomes, and R = MC²). We present an application of TAFTAP within a federal agency providing a readiness-informed TA approach to health departments of states, territories, and tribal areas implementing comprehensive tobacco prevention control programs. Pilot data suggest that TAFTAP is a promising approach for improving the quality of TA delivery. At the end of the 2-year project period, TAFTAP recipients provided generally positive qualitative feedback about the support they received. They chose to sustain the readiness-informed TA by incorporating it into a future funding announcement. Downstream state-level TA grantee recipients reported positive outcomes (e.g., accelerated progress, enjoying more one-on-one time with TA providers) from receiving the TA innovation from TAFTAP recipients. We suggest that funding agencies and training and TA centers consider this approach to bolster the capacity and motivation of TA providers for downstream benefit to health and human services staff and their clients. Practical steps for employing TAFTAP to advance health outcomes are included in this article.

Racial and ethnic minority communities have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19, but the uptake of COVID-19 mitigation strategies like vaccination and testing have been slower in these populations. With the continued spread of COVID-19 while in-person learning is a priority, school-aged youth and their caregivers must make health-related decisions daily to ensure health at school. It is critical to understand factors associated with COVID-related health decisions such as vaccination, testing, and other health behaviors (e.g., wearing masks, hand washing). Community-engaged campaigns are necessary to overcome barriers to these health behaviors and promote health equity. The aim of this study was to examine COVID-19-related concerns and influences on health decisions in middle and high schools serving primarily racial and ethnic minority, low-income families. Seven focus groups were conducted with school staff, parents, and students (aged 16 years and older). Qualitative data were analyzed using a general inductive approach. Factors related to COVID-19 concerns and health decisions centered on (1) vaccine hesitancy, (2) testing hesitancy, (3) developmental stage (i.e., ability to engage in health behaviors based on developmental factors like age), (4) cultural and family traditions and beliefs, (5) compatibility of policies and places with recommended health behaviors, (6) reliability of information, and (7) perceived risk. We explore sub-themes in further detail. It is important to understand the community's level of concern and identify factors that influence COVID-19 medical decision making to better address disparities in COVID-19 testing and vaccination uptake.

The clinical decisions and actions of evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP) are largely underspecified and poorly understood, in part due to the lack of measurement methods. We tested the reliability of a behavioral coding system that characterizes a flow of interrelated activities that includes problem detection and prioritization, intervention selection and implementation, and review of intervention integrity and impact. The context included two publicly funded youth mental health service organizations located in geographically distinct and underresourced communities in the U.S. where service inequities are common. We sampled 84 digitally recorded and transcribed supervision events that included a sample of professionals who were mostly women (93.02%) and BIPOC (86.04%) whose self-reported race/ethnicity matched the youth populations they served. We coded these events for activities (e.g., considering) and their predicate content (i.e., problems or practices) and examined reliability of these codes applied to excerpts (i.e., small contiguous units of dialogue) as well as to complete events. Interrater reliability estimates showed that, overall, coders reliably rated the occurrence and extensiveness of activities and content. Excerpt coding was generally more reliable than event coding. However, mathematical aggregation of excerpt coding offered a superior method for estimating event codes reliably, reducing individual subjectivity while providing event level synthesis of activities that are grounded in excerpt level details. The assessment of clinical decisions and actions has the potential to unpack the black box of EBPP, with different methods best suited to different research questions and resource considerations.

Background/Objectives: Early care and education programs promote children’s social–emotional development, predicting later school success. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened an existing youth mental health crisis and increased teacher stress. Therefore, we applied an infant and early childhood mental health consultation model, Jump Start Plus COVID Support (JS+CS), aiming to decrease behavioral problems in children post-pandemic. Methods: A cluster randomized controlled trial compared JS+CS to an active control, Healthy Caregivers–Healthy Children (HC2), at 30 ECE centers in low-income areas in South Florida. Participants were not blinded to group assignment. Teachers reported on children’s social–emotional development at baseline and post-intervention using the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. We assessed whether teacher stress, classroom practices, and self-efficacy mediated the relationship between JS+CS and child outcomes. We also explored whether baseline behavior problems moderated JS+CS effects on child protective factors, relative to HC2. Results: Direct group-by-time differences between JS+CS and HC2 were limited. However, JS+CS demonstrated significant within-group improvements in teacher-reported child protective factors, behavior support practices, and classroom safety practices. Classroom safety practices consistently mediated positive changes in child behaviors, including the DECA total protective factor score and subdomains of initiative and self-regulation. Additionally, teacher perceptions of behavior support mediated gains in child attachment. Conclusions: JS+CS shows promise in building protective systems around children through intentional support for teachers, underscoring the value of whole-child, whole-environment approaches in early intervention.

Background/Objectives: High-quality inclusive education is important for promoting the positive development of children with disabilities in early childhood care and education (ECCE) settings. However, ECCE teachers may not have the knowledge and skills to manage challenging behaviors in young children, especially those with disabilities. Infant and Early childhood mental health consultation (IECMHC) is one mechanism to support the professional development of teachers. This study explored the impact of an evidence-based IECMHC program, Jump Start Plus COVID Support (JS+CS), on outcomes for teachers in classrooms including children with disabilities. Methods: Utilizing a RE-AIM framework, we examined the extent that JS+CS impacted teacher outcomes related to classroom practice and teacher attitudes after the initial intervention period. In addition, we examined the extent that the classroom children with disability ratio moderated the impact of the intervention on teacher outcomes. Using a cluster randomized controlled trial in a sample of 138 racially and ethnically diverse teachers in 31 ECCE centers, we examined the reach, effectiveness, adoption, and implementation of JS+CS. Results: The results indicate that the JS+CS program shows promise as an intervention to support ECCE teachers working in classrooms with children with disabilities, particularly in improving teacher safety practices, behavior management skills, and resiliency coping. In addition, the program was adopted equally in classrooms that served children with and without disabilities. Conclusions: This is a unique contribution to the literature given that no previous IECMHC programs have examined adoption in classrooms serving children with disabilities. Further investigation is needed to determine the specific factors that impact program implementation considering that this study was conducted during various phases of the COVID-19 pandemic.