Jennifer Follstad Shah

Dr. Jennifer Follstad Shah

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 February 2017 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJennifer Follstad Shah
Jennifer Follstad Shah
JKJohn S. Kominoski
John S. Kominoski
MAMarcelo Ardón
Marcelo Ardón
WDWalter K. Dodds
Walter K. Dodds
MGMark O. Gessner
Mark O. Gessner
LZLydia H. Zeglin
Lydia H. Zeglin
Streams and rivers are important conduits of terrestrially derived carbon (C) to atmospheric and marine reservoirs. Leaf litter breakdown rates are expected to increase as water temperatures rise in response to climate change. The magnitude of increase in breakdown rates is uncertain, given differences in litter quality and microbial and detritivore community responses to temperature, factors that can influence the apparent temperature sensitivity of breakdown and the relative proportion of C lost to the atmosphere vs. stored or transported downstream. Here, we synthesized 1025 records of litter breakdown in streams and rivers to quantify its temperature sensitivity, as measured by the activation energy (Ea, in eV). Temperature sensitivity of litter breakdown varied among twelve plant genera for which Ea could be calculated. Higher values of Ea were correlated with lower‐quality litter, but these correlations were influenced by a single, N‐fixing genus (Alnus). Ea values converged when genera were classified into three breakdown rate categories, potentially due to continual water availability in streams and rivers modulating the influence of leaf chemistry on breakdown. Across all data representing 85 plant genera, the Ea was 0.34 ± 0.04 eV, or approximately half the value (0.65 eV) predicted by metabolic theory. Our results indicate that average breakdown rates may increase by 5–21% with a 1–4 °C rise in water temperature, rather than a 10–45% increase expected, according to metabolic theory. Differential warming of tropical and temperate biomes could result in a similar proportional increase in breakdown rates, despite variation in Ea values for these regions (0.75 ± 0.13 eV and 0.27 ± 0.05 eV, respectively). The relative proportions of gaseous C loss and organic matter transport downstream should not change with rising temperature given that Ea values for breakdown mediated by microbes alone and microbes plus detritivores were similar at the global scale.

17 December 2020 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMarcelo Ardón
Marcelo Ardón
LZLydia H. Zeglin
Lydia H. Zeglin
Ryan UtzRyan Utz
Ryan Utz
SCScott D. Cooper
Scott D. Cooper
WDWalter K. Dodds
Walter K. Dodds
AWAmelia Ward
Amelia Ward

14 June 2024 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STScott Tiegs
Scott Tiegs
KCK. A. Capps
K. A. Capps
DCD. M. Costello
D. M. Costello
JSJ. P. Schmidt
J. P. Schmidt
CPC. J. Patrick
C. J. Patrick
JZJacob A. Zwart
Jacob A. Zwart
Rivers and streams contribute to global carbon cycling by decomposing immense quantities of terrestrial plant matter. However, decomposition rates are highly variable and large-scale patterns and drivers of this process remain poorly understood. Using a cellulose-based assay to reflect the primary constituent of plant detritus, we generated a predictive model (81% variance explained) for cellulose decomposition rates across 514 globally distributed streams. A large number of variables were important for predicting decomposition, highlighting the complexity of this process at the global scale. Predicted cellulose decomposition rates, when combined with genus-level litter quality attributes, explain published leaf litter decomposition rates with high accuracy (70% variance explained). Our global map provides estimates of rates across vast understudied areas of Earth and reveals rapid decomposition across continental-scale areas dominated by human activities.

16 March 2022 in Global Biogeochemical Cycles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDavid M. Costello
David M. Costello
STScott D. Tiegs
Scott D. Tiegs
LBLuz Boyero
Luz Boyero
Cristina CanhotoCristina Canhoto
Cristina Canhoto
KCKrista A. Capps
Krista A. Capps
JZJacob A. Zwart
Jacob A. Zwart
Microbes play a critical role in plant litter decomposition and influence the fate of carbon in rivers and riparian zones. When decomposing low‐nutrient plant litter, microbes acquire nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from the environment (i.e., nutrient immobilization), and this process is potentially sensitive to nutrient loading and changing climate. Nonetheless, environmental controls on immobilization are poorly understood because rates are also influenced by plant litter chemistry, which is coupled to the same environmental factors. Here we used a standardized, low‐nutrient organic matter substrate (cotton strips) to quantify nutrient immobilization at 100 paired stream and riparian sites representing 11 biomes worldwide. Immobilization rates varied by three orders of magnitude, were greater in rivers than riparian zones, and were strongly correlated to decomposition rates. In rivers, P immobilization rates were controlled by surface water phosphate concentrations, but N immobilization rates were not related to inorganic N. The N:P of immobilized nutrients was tightly constrained to a molar ratio of 10:1 despite wide variation in surface water N:P. Immobilization rates were temperature‐dependent in riparian zones but not related to temperature in rivers. However, in rivers nutrient supply ultimately controlled whether microbes could achieve the maximum expected decomposition rate at a given temperature. Collectively, we demonstrated that exogenous nutrient supply and immobilization are critical control points for decomposition of organic matter.

5 March 2019 in Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJennifer Follstad Shah
Jennifer Follstad Shah
YJY. Jameel
Y. Jameel
RSR.M. Smith
R.M. Smith
RGR.S. Gabor
R.S. Gabor
PBP.D. Brooks
P.D. Brooks
SWS.R. Weintraub
S.R. Weintraub