The presence of cell-free microRNAs (miRNAs) has been detected in a range of body fluids. The miRNA content of plasma/serum in particular has been proposed as a potential source of novel biomarkers for a number of diseases. Nevertheless, the quantification of miRNAs from plasma or serum is made difficult due to inefficient isolation and lack of consensus regarding the optimal reference miRNA. The effect of haemolysis on the quantification and normalisation of miRNAs in plasma has not been investigated in great detail. We found that levels of miR-16, a commonly used reference gene, showed little variation when measured in plasma samples from healthy volunteers or patients with malignant mesothelioma or coronary artery disease. Including samples with evidence of haemolysis led to variation in miR-16 levels and consequently decreased its ability to serve as a reference. The levels of miR-16 and miR-451, both present in significant levels in red blood cells, were proportional to the degree of haemolysis. Measurements of the level of these miRNAs in whole blood, plasma, red blood cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed that the miRNA content of red blood cells represents the major source of variation in miR-16 and miR-451 levels measured in plasma. Adding lysed red blood cells to non-haemolysed plasma allowed a cut-off level of free haemoglobin to be determined, below which miR-16 and miR-451 levels displayed little variation between individuals. In conclusion, increases in plasma miR-16 and miR-451 are caused by haemolysis. In the absence of haemolysis the levels of both miR-16 and miR-451 are sufficiently constant to serve as normalisers.
1 November 2011 in Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
The human multidrug resistance proteins MRP4 and MRP5 are organic anion transporters that have the unusual ability to transport cyclic nucleotides and some nucleoside monophosphate analogs. Base and nucleoside analogs used in the chemotherapy of cancer and viral infections are potential substrates. To assess the possible contribution of MRP4 and MRP5 to resistance against these drugs, we have investigated the transport mediated by MRP4 and MRP5. In cytotoxicity assays, MRP4 conferred resistance to the antiviral agent 9-(2-phosphonomethoxyethyl)adenine (PMEA) and high-performance liquid chromatography analysis showed that, like MRP5, MRP4 transported PMEA in an unmodified form. MRP4 also mediated substantial resistance against other acyclic nucleoside phosphonates, whereas MRP5 did not. Apart from low-level MRP4-mediated cladribine resistance, the cytotoxicity of clinically used anticancer nucleosides was not influenced by overexpression of MRP4 or MRP5. In contrast, MRP5 mediated efflux of the pyrimidine-based antiviral 2′,3′-dideoxynucleoside 2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxythymidine 5′-monophosphate (d4TMP) and its phosphoramidate derivative alaninyl-d4TMP from cells loaded with the 2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxythymidine prodrugs cyclosaligenyl-d4TMP and aryloxyphosphoramidate d4TMP (So324), respectively. Moreover, only inside-out membrane vesicles derived from MRP5-overexpressing cells accumulated alaninyl-d4TMP. Cellular efflux and vesicular uptake studies were carried out to further compare transport mediated by MRP4 and MRP5 and showed that dipyridamole, dilazep, nitrobenzyl mercaptopurine riboside, sildenafil, trequinsin and MK571 inhibited MRP4 more than MRP5, whereas cyclic nucleotides and monophosphorylated nucleoside analogs were equally poor inhibitors of both pumps. These results strongly suggest that the affinity of MRP4 and MRP5 for nucleotide-based substrates is low.
Cell-free microRNAs in plasma and serum have become a promising source of biomarkers for various diseases. Despite rapid progress in this field, there remains a lack of consensus regarding optimal quantification methods, reference genes, and quality control of samples. Recent studies have shown that hemolysis occurring during blood collection has substantial impact on the microRNA content in plasma/serum. To date, the impact of hemolysis has only been investigated for a limited number of microRNAs, mainly the red blood cell (RBC)-enriched miRs-16 and -451. In contrast, the effect of hemolysis on other microRNAs – in particular those proposed as biomarkers – has not been addressed. In this study we profiled the microRNA content of hemolyzed and non-hemolyzed plasma as well as RBCs to obtain a profile of microRNAs in the circulation affected or unaffected by hemolysis. Profiling by TaqMan Array Microfluidic Cards was used to compare three pairs of hemolyzed and non-hemolyzed plasma (with varying degrees of hemolysis) and one RBC sample. A total of 136 microRNAs were detectable in at least two of the samples, and of those 15 were at least twofold elevated in all three hemolyzed samples. This number increased to 88 microRNAs for the sample with the highest level of hemolysis, with all of these also detected in the RBC profile. Thus these microRNAs represent a large proportion of detectable microRNAs and those most likely to be affected by hemolysis. Several of the hemolysis-susceptible microRNAs (e.g., miRs-21, -106a, -92a, -17, -16) have also been previously proposed as plasma/serum biomarkers of disease, highlighting the importance of rigorous quality control of plasma/serum samples used for measurement of circulating microRNAs. As low-level hemolysis is a frequent occurrence during plasma/serum collection it is critical that this is taken into account in the measurement of any candidate circulating microRNA.
Human multidrug-resistance protein (MRP) 4 transports cyclic nucleotides and when overproduced in mammalian cells mediates resistance to some nucleoside analogues. Recently, it has been shown that Mrp4 is induced in the livers of Fxr(-/-) mice, which have increased levels of serum bile acids. Since MRP4, like MRP1–3, also mediates transport of a model steroid conjugate substrate, oestradiol 17-β-d-glucuronide (E217βG), we tested whether MRP4 may be involved in the transport of steroid and bile acid conjugates. Bile salts, especially sulphated derivatives, and cholestatic oestrogens inhibited the MRP4-mediated transport of E217βG. Inhibition by oestradiol 3,17-disulphate and taurolithocholate 3-sulphate was competitive, suggesting that these compounds are MRP4 substrates. Furthermore, we found that MRP4 transports dehydroepiandrosterone 3-sulphate (DHEAS), the most abundant circulating steroid in humans, which is made in the adrenal gland. The ATP-dependent transport of DHEAS by MRP4 showed saturable kinetics with Km and Vmax values of 2μM and 45pmol/mg per min, respectively (at 27°C). We further studied the possible involvement of other members of the MRP family of transporters in the transport of DHEAS. We found that MRP1 transports DHEAS in a glutathione-dependent manner and exhibits Km and Vmax values of 5μM and 73pmol/mg per min, respectively (at 27°C). No transport of DHEAS was observed in membrane vesicles containing MRP2 or MRP3. Our findings suggest a physiological role for MRP1 and MRP4 in DHEAS transport and an involvement of MRP4 in transport of conjugated steroids and bile acids.