Major advances in therapeutic proteins, including antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs), have created revolutionary drug delivery systems in cancer over the past decade. While these immunoconjugate agents provide several advantages compared to their small-molecule counterparts, their clinical use is still in its infancy. The considerations in their development and clinical use are complex, and consist of multiple components and variables that can affect the pharmacologic characteristics. It is critical to understand the mechanisms employed by ADCs in navigating biological barriers and how these factors affect their biodistribution, delivery to tumors, efficacy, and toxicity. Thus, future studies are warranted to better understand the complex pharmacology and interaction between ADC carriers and biological systems, such as the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) and tumor microenvironment. This review provides an overview of factors that affect the pharmacologic profiles of ADC therapies that are currently in clinical use and development.
Although efforts have been made to identify circadian-controlled genes regulating cell cycle progression and cell death, little is known about the metabolic signals modulating circadian regulation of gene expression. We identify heme, an iron-containing prosthetic group, as a regulatory ligand controlling human Period-2 (hPer2) stability. Furthermore, we define a novel heme-regulatory motif within the C terminus of hPer2 (SC(841)PA) as necessary for heme binding and protein destabilization. Spectroscopy reveals that whereas the PAS domain binds to both the ferric and ferrous forms of heme, SC(841)PA binds exclusively to ferric heme, thus acting as a redox sensor. Consequently, binding prevents hPer2 from interacting with its stabilizing counterpart cryptochrome. In vivo, hPer2 downregulation is suppressed by inhibitors of heme synthesis or proteasome activity, while SA(841)PA is sufficient to stabilize hPer2 in transfected cells. Moreover, heme binding to the SC(841)PA motif directly impacts circadian gene expression, resulting in altered period length. Overall, the data support a model where heme-mediated oxidation triggers hPer2 degradation, thus controlling heterodimerization and ultimately gene transcription.
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) appear to be in a developmental boom, with five FDA approvals in the last two years and a projected market value of over $4 billion by 2024. Major advancements in the engineering of these novel cytotoxic drug carriers have provided a few early success stories. Although the use of these immunoconjugate agents are still in their infancy, valuable lessons in the engineering of these agents have been learned from both preclinical and clinical failures. It is essential to appreciate how the various mechanisms used to engineer changes in ADCs can alter the complex pharmacology of these agents and allow the ADCs to navigate the modern-day therapeutic challenges within oncology. This review provides a global overview of ADC characteristics which can be engineered to alter the interaction with the immune system, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and therapeutic index of ADCs. In addition, this review will highlight some of the engineering approaches being explored in the creation of the next generation of ADCs.
1 February 2016 in Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Major developments in nanomedicines, such as nanoparticles (NPs), nanosomes, and conjugates, have revolutionized drug delivery capabilities over the past four decades. Although nanocarrier agents provide numerous advantages (e.g., greater solubility and duration of systemic exposure) compared to their small-molecule counterparts, there is considerable inter-patient variability seen in the systemic disposition, tumor delivery and overall pharmacological effects (i.e., anti-tumor efficacy and unwanted toxicity) of NP agents. This review aims to provide a summary of fundamental factors that affect the disposition of NPs in the treatment of cancer and why they should be evaluated during preclinical and clinical development. Furthermore, this chapter will highlight some of the translational challenges associated with elements of NPs and how these issues can only be addressed by detailed and novel pharmacology studies.