Saptarshi Roy

Mr. Saptarshi Roy


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSaptarshi Roy
Saptarshi Roy
JMJames Robert Moran
James Robert Moran
KDKeerthana Danasekaran
Keerthana Danasekaran
KOKate O'Brien
Kate O'Brien
Sivanesan DakshanamurthySivanesan Dakshanamurthy
Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy
Despite their significant impact, comprehensive screenings and detailed analyses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) binding strengths at the orthosteric and allosteric sites of NRs are currently lacking. This study addresses this gap by focusing on the binding interaction analysis of both common and uncommon PFAS with the nuclear receptors (NRs) vitamin D receptor (VDR), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), pregnane X receptor (PXR), and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). Advanced docking simulations were used to screen 9507 PFAS chemicals at the orthosteric and allosteric sites of PPARγ, PXR, VDR, and ERα. All receptors exhibited strong binding interactions at the orthosteric and allosteric site with a significant number of PFAS. We verified the accuracy of the docking protocol through multiple docking controls and validations. A mixture modeling analysis indicates that PFAS can bind in various combinations with themselves and endogenous ligands simultaneously, to disrupt the endocrine system and cause carcinogenic responses. These findings reveal that PFAS can interfere with nuclear receptor activity by displacing endogenous or native ligands by binding to the orthosteric and allosteric sites. The purpose of this study is to explore the mechanisms through which PFAS exert their endocrine-disrupting effects, potentially leading to more targeted therapeutic strategies. Importantly, this study is the first to explore the binding of PFAS at allosteric sites and to model PFAS mixtures at nuclear receptors. Given the high concentration and persistence of PFAS in humans, this study further emphasizes the urgent need for further research into the carcinogenic mechanisms of PFAS and the development of therapeutic strategies that target nuclear receptors.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Harrish GaneshHarrish Ganesh
Harrish Ganesh
JMJames Robert Moran
James Robert Moran
SRSaptarshi Roy
Saptarshi Roy
JMJoshua Mathew
Joshua Mathew
JAJehosheba Ackah-Blay
Jehosheba Ackah-Blay
Sivanesan DakshanamurthySivanesan Dakshanamurthy
Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are notable for their persistence, bioaccumulation, and associations with cancer. Human nuclear receptors (hNRs) are primary targets disrupted by these persistent EDCs, resulting in alterations to xenobiotic metabolism, lipid homeostasis, and endocrine function, which can lead to carcinogenic effects. Despite their hazardous effects, comprehensive studies on EDC interactions and their impacts on hNRs remain limited. Here, we profiled the interactions of persistent EDCs, including PFAS, plastic additives, bisphenols, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and phthalates, with key hNRs such as PXR, CAR, PPARα, PPARγ, PPARδ, AR, and RORγt. Through controlled molecular docking simulations, we observed strong binding of the EDCs to these receptors. Further analysis showed that EDCs exhibit strong binding activity towards hNRs by preferentially interacting with hydrophobic amino acids, namely leucine, isoleucine, methionine, and phenylalanine. PFAS demonstrated the highest binding affinity, characterized by a combination of complementary hydrophobic interactions from their fluorinated carbon chains and polar interactions from their functional groups (e.g., carboxylate, sulfonate) across all receptors. Distinct polycyclic and hydrophobic trends, contributing to strong NR binding, were evident in non-PFAS and nonplastic EDCs. The hNR activity assay in HepG2 cells revealed agonistic effects of dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) and di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) on most receptors, except for PPARα. The hNR transcription factor pathway assay in HepG2 cells demonstrated increased gene expression of VDRE and PXR, suggesting potential chronic effects on xenobiotic metabolism and calcium homeostasis. Overall, our findings demonstrate the need for further research into the endocrine disruption and carcinogenic effects of these persistent EDCs.

20 May 2024 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
SRSaptarshi Roy
Saptarshi Roy
KDKeerthana Danasekaran
Keerthana Danasekaran
JMJames Robert Moran
James Robert Moran
KOKate O'Brien
Kate O'Brien
Sivanesan DakshanamurthySivanesan Dakshanamurthy
Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy
Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent environmental contaminants of emerging concern, recognized for their toxicity and potential carcinogenic properties. PFAS chemicals are reported to act as endocrine disruptors through their interactions with various nuclear receptors (NRs). Despite their significant impact, comprehensive screenings and detailed analyses of PFAS binding strengths at both the orthosteric and allosteric sites of NRs are currently lacking in the literature. Our study addresses this gap by focusing on the binding interaction analysis of both common and uncommon PFAS with key nuclear receptors such as the vitamin D receptor (VDR), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), pregnane X receptor (PXR), and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). We used advanced docking simulations to screen 9,507 PFAS chemicals at the orthosteric and allosteric sites of the PPARγ, PXR, VDR, and ERα. We verified the accuracy of our docking protocol through multiple docking procedures and validations. The python code used for PFAS chemical screening is deposited in the supplementary file. Among the PFAS assessed at the orthosteric site of the VDR, 21 demonstrated similar binding affinities compared to the calcitriol, while 130 PFAS, exhibited stronger binding affinities than calcitriol. At the VDR allosteric site, where lithocholic acid (LCA) natively binds, 412 PFAS matched the binding energies of LCA, and 2,229 showed even greater binding energies. Similar testing on the PXR, PPARγ, and ERα revealed that the orthosteric site of PPARγ had 1,863 PFAS binding with a higher affinity than native ligand ET1 and 693 PFAS binding at the allosteric site with greater affinity than T35 native ligand. At the PXR orthosteric site, 650 PFAS bound with a greater affinity than native ligand 4WH, while at the allosteric site, 9,148 PFAS demonstrated a greater binding affinity than the known allosetric ligand glycerol. At the orthosteric site of ERα, 40 PFAS displayed binding with a greater affinity than the native ligand estradiol and at the allosteric site, only 8 PFAS exhibited greater binding affinity than coactivator ligand SRC-1. Further, our mixture modeling analysis indicates that PFAS can bind in various combinations with themselves and with endogenous or native ligands simultaneously, to disrupt the endocrine system and cause carcinogenic responses. These findings reveal that PFAS can interfere with nuclear receptor activity by displacing endogenous or native ligands by binding to the orthosteric and allosteric sites. This study elucidates the mechanisms through which PFAS exert their endocrine-disrupting effects, potentially leading to more targeted environmental regulations and therapeutic strategies. Importantly, this study is the first to explore the binding of PFAS at allosteric sites and to model PFAS mixtures at nuclear receptors. Given the high concentration and persistence of PFAS in humans, this study called for the urgent need for further research into the carcinogenic mechanisms of PFAS and the development of intervention strategies that target nuclear receptors. Our ongoing studies extend these findings by further investigating the interactions of PFAS and co-exposed chemicals with nuclear receptors. These investigations are supported by experimental verification, which will enhance our understanding of PFAS broad effects and aid in the design of effective mitigation strategies.