(1) Background: This study aims to evaluate how different irrigation settings and the use of ureteral access sheaths (UASs) of varying sizes impact intrarenal pressure (IRP) during flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) procedures in pigs. (2) Methods: This study utilized three anesthetized female pigs. A novel flexible ureteroscope with the ability to continuously record live intrarenal pressure was used to perform ureteroscopy in different settings. Ureteroscopy was performed without UAS and with the use of 11/13 and 12/14 UAS at the ureteropelvic junction. Two different irrigation methods were employed for each parameter: one using gravity flow and the other using manual pumping with a commercial pump. IRP was also recorded with the presence of a laser fiber or lithotripsy basket. (3) Results: The recorded mean IRP during flexible URS without UAS was 28.25 (±11.2) under gravity irrigation; 35.46 (±10.08) under manual pumping; 22.5 (±3.05) and 30.75 (±5.79) with a laser fiber under gravity irrigation and manual pumping, respectively; and 16.45 (±1.27) and 17.27 (±3.69) with a lithotripsy basket under gravity irrigation and manual pumping, respectively. With an 11/13 UAS, the mean IRP was 15.41 (±8.57) and 19.33 (±4.26) under gravity and manual pumping irrigation, respectively; 14.56 (±2.50) and 18.64 (±5.13) with a laser in each irrigation setting, respectively; and 13.10 (±3.39) and 13.86 (±4.63) with a lithotripsy basket, respectively. With a 12/14 UAS, the mean IRP was 7.64 (±3.08) and 9.25 (±1.42) under gravity and manual pumping irrigation, respectively; 9.50 (±6.04) and 10.28 (3.46), respectively, in each setting when the laser fiber was used; and 5.32 (±1.57) and 6.26 (±1.79), respectively, when the lithotripsy basket was inserted. (4) Conclusion: Novel flexible ureteroscopes with integrated pressure sensors are both a feasible and reliable tool during fURS, giving the surgeon the ability to live-track the IRP. The results of the IRP measurements with and without UAS are in accordance with the current literature and exhibit a consistent pattern with previous studies.

Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is an effective treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), but infections pose a significant threat to its success. Current guidelines lack antifungal recommendations, despite rising fungal infection rates post-IPP surgery. This review examines epidemiology, risk factors (including diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, and obesity), and pathogenesis, highlighting the role of biofilm formation in device contamination. Clinical manifestations vary from acute to delayed, with fungal biofilms presenting challenges in diagnosis. Prophylactic strategies, including broad-spectrum antibiotics and antifungals, are crucial, with evidence suggesting a 92% reduction in infections. With fungal infections showing lower salvage rates, management involves culture-guided treatment, irrigation, and oral antibiotics. Future research aims to understand biofilm mechanisms and develop biomaterials to reduce infection rates. Implementing antifungal therapy, along with standard practices like the no-touch technique and antibiotic dips, is crucial in preventing IPP infections.

Purpose: The aim of this study is the evaluation of the distribution of paclitaxel (PTX) released by a coated balloon in the layers of rabbit’s urethra.Methods: 18 rabbits were included. A laser device was used for the stricture formation. After two weeks, dilation of the strictured urethra was performed by using Advance 35LP PTA balloons and Advance 18 PTX PTA balloons. The experimental models were divided into 3 groups. The group Α included two rabbits without any intervention except for the stenosis procedure. Group B compromised six rabbits that underwent dilation with Advance 35LP PTA balloons. Group C consisted of 10 rabbits to which dilation with both Advance 35LP PTA balloons and Advance 18 PTX PTA balloons was applied. Histological evaluation and Immunohistochemistry were performed on all specimens.Results: Inflammation, fibrosis and ruptures were detected in the specimens of the study. In specimens of Group C the decrease of inflammation and fibrosis rate was greater. Anti-PTX antibody was detected in the epithelium, lamina propria and smooth muscle layer of all specimens of urethras that have been harvested immediately and 1 day after the dilation with Advance 18 PTX PTA balloon and it was not observed in any layer of the urethral wall of the rest of the examined specimens of Group C.Conclusions: PTX’s enrichment was detected in the smooth muscle layer of all specimens that have been harvested immediately and 24h after the dilation with Advance 18 PTX PTA balloons. PTX may play an inhibitive role in the recurrence of the stenosis.

The Central European Journal of Urology is an open access quarterly-issued journal, which provides a forum for the presentation of original clinical, experimental and other research studies...

Objective: To evaluate the tissue injury caused by the force applied by the roboticassisted graspers of avatera robotic surgical system on bowel tissue. Methods: An experimental in vivo porcine model with 1 pig was conducted. After a standard transperitoneal setup of the avatera robotic surgical system, different laparoscopic and robotic graspers were used on the bowel with maximum force applied each time. Robotic atraumatic grasper, laparoscopic right angle grasper, laparoscopic curved grasper, and laparoscopic atraumatic grasper were used. After using all graspers, the pig was sacrificed. The bowel segments were resected and sent for histological analysis. Results: The pathologist reported that all the graspers caused signs of acute inflammation without any irreversible damage or signs compatible with ischemia of the tissue. No significant difference in histology was observed between the graspers. Conclusion: No permanent damage was caused by graspers, except for acute, reversible inflammation. Concluding, the avatera grasper could be safe to use on bowel segments, independent of the applied pressure. Cite this article as: Tatanis V, Natsos A, Tsaturyan A, et al. How safe are the laparoscopic and robotic graspers? Evaluation of the novel avatera robotic surgical system: An acute in vivo study on a porcine model. Urol Res Pract. 2023;49(6):387-391.