Alfred E. Chang

Dr. Alfred E. Chang


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 July 2011 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
QLQiao Li
Qiao Li
XLXiangming Lao
Xiangming Lao
QPQin Pan
Qin Pan
NNNing Ning
Ning Ning
JYJi Yet
Ji Yet
ACAlfred E. Chang
Alfred E. Chang
Purpose: We investigated the antitumor reactivity of adoptively transferred effector B cells and the mechanisms by which they may mediate tumor regression in a spontaneous metastases model. Experimental Design: 4T1 breast cancer cells were inoculated into the flanks of syngeneic Balb/C mice to prime draining lymph nodes. Tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLN) were harvested and B cells activated ex vivo with lipopolysaccharide and anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. These activated B cells were adoptively transferred into mice inoculated with 4T1 tumor in the mammary fat pad. The induction of host T-cell immunity was evaluated. Results: Activated 4T1 TDLN B cells secreted immunoglobulin G (IgG) in response to tumor cells which was immunologically specific. These activated B cells were capable of mediating specific lysis of tumor cells in vitro. Transfer of these activated B cells alone mediated the inhibition of spontaneous metastases to the lung. Examination of the host revealed that the transfer of these B cells resulted in the induction of tumor-specific T-cell immunity as measured by cytotoxicity and cytokine (IFNγ and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) production. The combined transfer of activated T and B cells from TDLN resulted in tumor regression, which was greater than either cell population alone, with host B cells capable of producing IgG that mediated lysis of tumor in the presence of complement. Conclusions: We have found that appropriately primed B cells can mediate tumor regression by itself and confers host T-cell antitumor immunity. Furthermore, effector B cells can serve as a useful adjunct in adoptive T-cell therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 17(15); 4987–95. ©2011 AACR.

14 December 2011 in Journal of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BFBernard A Fox
Bernard A Fox
DSDolores J Schendel
Dolores J Schendel
LBLisa H Butterfield
Lisa H Butterfield
SASteinar Aamdal
Steinar Aamdal
JAJames P Allison
James P Allison
MDMary Lenora Disis
Mary Lenora Disis
Scientific discoveries that provide strong evidence of antitumor effects in preclinical models often encounter significant delays before being tested in patients with cancer. While some of these delays have a scientific basis, others do not. We need to do better. Innovative strategies need to move into early stage clinical trials as quickly as it is safe, and if successful, these therapies should efficiently obtain regulatory approval and widespread clinical application. In late 2009 and 2010 the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC), convened an "Immunotherapy Summit" with representatives from immunotherapy organizations representing Europe, Japan, China and North America to discuss collaborations to improve development and delivery of cancer immunotherapy. One of the concepts raised by SITC and defined as critical by all parties was the need to identify hurdles that impede effective translation of cancer immunotherapy. With consensus on these hurdles, international working groups could be developed to make recommendations vetted by the participating organizations. These recommendations could then be considered by regulatory bodies, governmental and private funding agencies, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions to facilitate changes necessary to accelerate clinical translation of novel immune-based cancer therapies. The critical hurdles identified by representatives of the collaborating organizations, now organized as the World Immunotherapy Council, are presented and discussed in this report. Some of the identified hurdles impede all investigators; others hinder investigators only in certain regions or institutions or are more relevant to specific types of immunotherapy or first-in-humans studies. Each of these hurdles can significantly delay clinical translation of promising advances in immunotherapy yet if overcome, have the potential to improve outcomes of patients with cancer.

1 February 1997 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAlfred E. Chang
Alfred E. Chang
AAA Aruga
A Aruga
MCM J Cameron
M J Cameron
VSV K Sondak
V K Sondak
DND P Normolle
D P Normolle
SSS Shu
S Shu
PURPOSE: In preclinical studies, we have reported the ability to induce immune T cells in lymph nodes (LN) primed by in vivo vaccination with tumor cells admixed with a bacterial adjuvant. These LN cells can be activated and expanded ex vivo for the successful immunotherapy of established tumors. We have applied these methods to generate vaccine-primed LN in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell cancer (RCC) for therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Irradiated autologous tumor cells admixed with bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) were used to vaccinate patients. Seven days later, draining LN were removed for activation with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) followed by expansion in interleukin-2 (IL-2). Activated LN cells were administered intravenously (IV) with the concomitant administration of IL-2. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were evaluated (11 melanoma and 12 RCC). Vaccine-primed LN were expanded ex vivo with a mean of 8.4 x 10(10) cells administered per patient. Among 20 patients assessed, 15 demonstrated minimal cytotoxicity of autologous tumor cells by the activated LN cells, with the remaining mediating nonspecific cytotoxicity. By contrast, a majority of the activated LN cells showed highly specific release of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) to autologous but not allogeneic tumor stimulation. This tumor-specific cytokine release was found to be major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-restricted, which indicates the involvement of CD8+ cells. Among 11 melanoma patients, one had a partial tumor response. Among 12 RCC patients, two had complete and two partial responses. A trend (P = .066) between the enhancement of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactivity to autologous tumor after therapy and tumor regression was observed. CONCLUSION: Tumor vaccines can be used to induce immunologically specific T-cell responses against melanoma and RCC in draining LN. Anti-CD3/IL-2 activation of primed LN cells can be reliably performed for clinical therapy and appears to have activity in patients with metastatic RCC.

1 September 2009 in The Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
QLQiao Li
Qiao Li
STSeagal Teitz-Tennenbaum
Seagal Teitz-Tennenbaum
EDElizabeth J. Donald
Elizabeth J. Donald
MLMu Li
Mu Li
ACAlfred E. Chang
Alfred E. Chang
Adoptive cellular immunotherapy utilizing tumor-reactive T cells has proven to be a promising strategy for cancer treatment. However, we hypothesize that successful treatment strategies will have to appropriately stimulate not only cellular immunity, but also humoral immunity. We previously reported that B cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) may function as APCs. In this study, we identified TDLN B cells as effector cells in an adoptive immunotherapy model. In vivo primed and in vitro activated TDLN B cells alone mediated effective (p < 0.05) tumor regression after adoptive transfer into two histologically distinct murine pulmonary metastatic tumor models. Prior lymphodepletion of the host with either chemotherapy or whole-body irradiation augmented the therapeutic efficacy of the adoptively transferred TDLN B cells in the treatment of s.c. tumors as well as metastatic pulmonary tumors. Furthermore, B cell plus T cell transfers resulted in substantially more efficient antitumor responses than B cells or T cells alone (p < 0.05). Activated TDLN B cells conferred strong humoral responses to tumor. This was evident by the production of IgM, IgG, and IgG2b, which bound specifically to tumor cells and led to specific tumor cell lysis in the presence of complement. Collectively, these data indicate that in vivo primed and in vitro activated B cells can be employed as effector cells for cancer therapy. The synergistic antitumor efficacy of cotransferred activated B effector cells and T effector cells represents a novel approach for cancer adoptive immunotherapy.

26 December 2014 in European Journal of Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HTHuimin Tao
Huimin Tao
LLLin Lu
Lin Lu
YXYang Xia
Yang Xia
FDFu Dai
Fu Dai
YWYi Wang
Yi Wang
ACAlfred E. Chang
Alfred E. Chang
We have previously reported that adoptive transfer of tumor‐draining lymph node (TDLN) B cells confers tumor regression in a spontaneous pulmonary metastasis mouse model of breast cancer. In this study, we identified IL‐10‐producing cells within these B cells, and found that IL‐10 removal, either by using IL‐10−/− TDLN B cells or by systemic neutralization of IL‐10, significantly augmented the therapeutic efficacy of adoptively transferred TDLN B cells. Depletion of IL‐10 in B‐cell adoptive transfers significantly increased CTLs and B‐cell activity of PBMCs and splenic cells in the recipient. Activated TDLN B cells express Fas ligand, which was further enhanced by coculture of these TDLN B cells with 4T1 tumor cells. Effector B cells killed tumor cells directly in vitro in an antigen specific and Fas ligand‐dependent manner. Trafficking of TDLN B cells in vivo suggested that they were recruited to the tumor and lung as well as secondary lymphoid organs. These findings further define the biological function of antitumor effector B cells, which may offer alternative cellular therapies to cancer.

15 November 2004 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FIFumito Ito
Fumito Ito
QLQiao Li
Qiao Li
ASAndrew B. Shreiner
Andrew B. Shreiner
RORyuji Okuyama
Ryuji Okuyama
MJMaria N. Jure-Kunkel
Maria N. Jure-Kunkel
ACAlfred E. Chang
Alfred E. Chang
In weakly and poorly immunogenic tumor models, we examined the effects of stimulating CD137 (4-1BB) in vivo by administering anti-CD137 monoclonal antibody after tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell (TP-DC) vaccination. TP-DC subcutaneous vaccination induced a transient up-regulation of CD137 on T cells and natural killer (NK) cells within vaccine-primed lymph nodes (VPLNs). In established pulmonary and subcutaneous tumor models, anti-CD137 synergistically enhanced tumor regression after TP-DC vaccination. In the subcutaneous tumor model, the combined therapy resulted in improved survival. Combined therapy also resulted in improved local control of subcutaneous tumor after surgical resection. Anti-CD137 polarized the cytokine release of VPLNs and spleen cells in response to tumor antigen toward a type 1 (interferon-γ) versus a type 2 (interleukin-4) profile. Cell depletion and the use of knockout animals identified that CD8+, CD4+, and NK cells were involved in the tumor rejection response and that CD8+ cells had the major effector role. Anti-CD137 administration resulted in increased proliferation of adoptively transferred OT-1 CD8+ T cells in the VPLNs of mice inoculated with B16-OVA TP-DCs. Polarization toward type 1 (interferon-γ) versus type 2 (interleukin-4) was also observed with the OT-1 cells from VPLNs and spleen cells after anti-CD137 injections. This polarization effect was abrogated by the in vivo depletion of NK cells. These findings indicate that the adjuvant effect of anti-CD137 given in conjunction with TP-DC vaccination is associated with the polarization of T effector cells toward a type 1 response to tumor antigen and is mediated via NK cells.