BACKGROUND: Four guidelines have been suggested for optimal correction in adult spinal deformity surgery: Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification, age-adjusted sagittal alignment goals, Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score, and the Roussouly algorithm. Whether these goals provide benefit in both proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) reduction and clinical outcome improvement remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To validate 4 preoperative surgical planning tools in PJK development and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ≥5-segment fusion including the sacrum for adult spinal deformity with a follow-up of ≥2-year. PJK development and clinical outcomes were compared among the groups separately using 4 surgical guidelines: SRS-Schwab pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) modifier (Group 0, +, ++), age-adjusted PI-LL goal (undercorrection, matched correction, and overcorrection), GAP score (proportioned, moderately disproportioned, and severely disproportioned groups), and the Roussouly algorithm (restored and nonrestored groups). RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 68.3 years, and there were 162 women (85.7%). There were no differences in the rate of PJK development and clinical outcomes among SRS-Schwab PI-LL modifier and GAP score groups. With the age-adjusted PI-LL goal, PJK developed significantly less frequently in the matched group compared with the under- and overcorrection groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in the matched group compared with the under- and overcorrection groups. With the Roussouly algorithm, PJK developed significantly less frequently in the restored group than in the nonrestored group. However, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 Roussouly groups. CONCLUSION: Correction according to the age-adjusted PI-LL goal and the restored Roussouly type was associated with reduced PJK development. However, differences in clinical outcomes were only observed in the age-adjusted PI-LL groups.

OBJECTIVE: It has been well documented that optimal sagittal alignment is highly correlated with good clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. However, it remains to be determined whether the clinical benefit of appropriately corrected sagittal alignment can be maintained in the long term. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether appropriately corrected sagittal alignment continues to offer benefits over time with regard to clinical outcomes and mechanical failure.METHODS: Patients older than 50 years who underwent ≥ 4-level fusion for ASD and were followed up for ≥ 5 years were included in this study. Appropriateness of sagittal alignment correction was defined as pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis ≤ 10°, pelvic tilt ≤ 25°, and sagittal vertical axis ≤ 50 mm. Two groups were created based on this appropriateness: group A (appropriate) and group IA (inappropriate). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire–22 (SRS-22). The development of mechanical failures, such as rod fracture and proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), was compared between the two groups.RESULTS: The study included 90 patients with a follow-up duration of 90.3 months. There were 30 patients in group A and 60 patients in group IA. The clinical outcomes at 2 years were significantly better in group A than in group IA in terms of the VAS scores, ODI scores, and all domains of SRS-22. At the final follow-up visit, back VAS and ODI scores were still lower in group A than they were in group IA, but the VAS score for leg pain did not differ between the groups. The SRS-22 score at the final follow-up showed that only the pain and self-image/appearance domains and the total sum were significantly higher in group A than in group IA. The incidence of rod fracture and PJK did not differ between the two groups. The rate of revision surgery for rod fracture or PJK was also similar between the two groups.CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefits from appropriate correction of sagittal alignment continued for a mean of 90.3 months. However, the intergroup difference in clinical outcomes between groups A and IA decreased over time. The development of rod fracture or PJK was not affected by the appropriateness of sagittal alignment.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to correct abnormal spinal alignment in both the sagittal and coronal planes to alleviate pain and improve functional activities of daily living. Despite the advancements in surgical techniques that have led to better clinical outcomes, postoperative mechanical complications remain. These complications include instrumentation failure, with proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and rod fractures (RFs) being the most common. Such complications deteriorate clinical outcomes and often require revision surgery, which can be more burdensome for surgeons and patients, than index surgery. Thus, the risk factors for mechanical complications must be identified, and effective preventive strategies established. Therefore, this study aimed to review the risk factors for mechanical complications, focusing on PJK, PJF, and RF, and explore prevention strategies for these complications in ASD surgery, drawing upon recent literature.

We sought to identify preoperative factors significantly correlated with survival. We also aimed to evaluate the validity of the prognostic scores in the Tomita and Tokuhashi systems and discuss several aspects to improve the predictive accuracy of these systems. Moreover, we suggest modified criteria for selecting treatment strategies.