Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles (TEVs) have been confirmed to facilitate colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis by remodelling the tumour microenvironment (TME). Drugs targeted TEVs is considered as a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) plays a vital role in improving the prognosis of CRC patients and eventually CRC patients with distant metastasis. Although the anti-tumour effects of active compounds from TCM prescriptions are observed widely, the molecular mechanisms remain unknown. This study aims to investigate the effects of active compounds in our library of TCM on preventing CRC metastasis, and also explore the potential mechanisms from the perspective of TEVs. Materials and methods: The effects of active compounds on the proliferation of CRC cells were determined by CCK-8 assay. TEVs were extracted from MC38 cells by ultracentrifugation and characterized by electron microscopy, Nanosight NS300 and western blotting. The TEV particles were quantified by Nanosight NS300. The potential mechanism by which astragaloside IV (ASIV) reduced TEV secretion was determined by western blotting. RAW264.7 cells were cocultured with the conditioned medium (CM) of MC38 cells treated with or without ASIV, and the activation of tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) was assessed by immunofluorescence and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The migration of CRC cells was measured by wound healing and Transwell assay. A spleen-to-liver metastasis model of colorectal cancer was used to confirm the efficiency of ASIV in vivo. Liver metastatic tumours of the mice were used for liver weight measures and H&E staining. Immunofluorescence was applied to observe the infiltration of TAMs, the expression of neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2) and Rab27a. By screening our TCM monomer library, we found that ASIV, which is mainly extracted from Radix Astragali, reduced the release of TEVs from CRC cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Mechanistically, ASIV inhibited the production and secretion of TEVs by downregulating nSMase2 and Rab27a expression in CRC cells. CM from ASIV-treated CRC cells reshaped the polarization of TAMs by decreasing M2-type polarization, increasing M1-type polarization. Consequently, the repolarization of M2-type to M1-type macrophages led to reduced invasion and migration of CRC cells. Moreover, we confirmed that ASIV inhibited the liver metastasis of CRC, reduced M2-type macrophage infiltration and decreased the expression of nSMase2 and Rab27a in liver metastases. ASIV inhibited CRC metastasis by reducing EVs release and suppressing M2-type TAMs activation. All these findings reveal a new insight into the mechanisms of ASIV in preventing CRC progression and provide a promising approach for anti-tumour therapy.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), currently ranking as the third most lethal malignancy, poses a grave threat to human health. Ferroptosis, a form of programmed cell demise, has emerged as a promising therapeutic target in HCC treatment. In this study, we investigated the impact of ginsenoside RK1 on ferroptosis induction in HCC cells and elucidated the underlying mechanisms. Methods: The HCC cell line HepG2 was utilized to evaluate the effects of ginsenoside RK1. Distinct dosages of ginsenoside RK1 (25 μM, 50 μM, and 100 μM) were selected based on half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values. Cellular viability was assessed using a CCK8 assay, cytotoxicity was measured via lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay, and colony-forming ability was evaluated using the clone formation assay. Various inhibitors targeting apoptosis (Z-VAD-FMK 20 μM), necrosis (Nec-1, 10 μM), and ferroptosis (Fer-1, 10 μM; Lip-1, 1 μM) were employed to assess ginsenoside RK1’s impact on cell demise. Intracellular levels of key ions, including glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA), and iron ions, were quantified, and the protein expression levels of ferroptosis-related genes were evaluated. The sensitivity of HCC cells to ferroptosis induction by ginsenoside RK1 was examined following the overexpression and silencing of the aforementioned target genes. Results: Ginsenoside RK1 exhibited an inhibitory effect on HCC cells with an IC50 value of approximately 20 μM. It attenuated cellular viability and colony-forming capacity in a dose-dependent manner, concurrently reducing intracellular GSH levels and increasing intracellular Malondialdehyde (MDA) and iron ion contents. Importantly, cell demise induced by ginsenoside RK1 was specifically counteracted by ferroptosis inhibitors. Furthermore, the modulation of Ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) expression influenced the ability of ginsenoside RK1 to induce ferroptosis. FSP1 overexpression or silencing enhanced or inhibited ferroptosis induction by ginsenoside RK1, respectively. Conclusions: Ginsenoside RK1 enhances ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma through an FSP1-dependent pathway.

Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homologue (KRAS) mutation status is a crucial biomarker in rectal cancer as KRAS mutations confer resistance to anti-EGFR targeted t