A central role for neuroinflammation in epileptogenesis has recently been suggested by several investigations. This systematic review explores the role of inflammatory mediators in epileptogenesis, its association with seizure severity, and its correlation with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The study analysed articles published in JCR journals from 2019 to 2024. The search strategy comprised the MESH, free terms of “Neuroinflammation”, and selective searches for the following single biomarkers that had previously been selected from the relevant literature: “High mobility group box 1/HMGB1”, “Toll-Like-Receptor 4/TLR-4”, “Interleukin-1/IL-1”, “Interleukin-6/IL-6”, “Transforming growth factor beta/TGF-β”, and “Tumour necrosis factor-alpha/TNF-α”. These queries were all combined with the MESH terms “Epileptogenesis” and “Epilepsy”. We found 243 articles related to epileptogenesis and neuroinflammation, with 356 articles from selective searches by biomarker type. After eliminating duplicates, 324 articles were evaluated, with 272 excluded and 55 evaluated by the authors. A total of 21 articles were included in the qualitative evaluation, including 18 case–control studies, 2 case series, and 1 prospective study. As conclusion, this systematic review provides acceptable support for five biomarkers, including TNF-α and some of its soluble receptors (sTNFr2), HMGB1, TLR-4, CCL2 and IL-33. Certain receptors, cytokines, and chemokines are examples of neuroinflammation-related biomarkers that may be crucial for the early diagnosis of refractory epilepsy or may be connected to the control of epileptic seizures. Their value will be better defined by future studies.

Background and Objectives Autoimmune-associated epilepsy (AAE) with antiglutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) antibodies is considered a T-cell–mediated encephalitis that evolves to drug-resistant epilepsy. We do not have an effective therapeutic strategy for these patients. Because the GAD enzyme is primarily responsible for the conversion of glutamate to GABA, the mechanism of epileptogenesis in this condition predicts decreased levels of GABA content in synaptic vesicles. Cenobamate (CNB) acts as a positive allosteric modulator at synaptic and extra synaptic GABAA receptors, producing increased inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain. This mechanism could be especially beneficial in AAE with anti-GAD65 antibodies because it would be able to correct the imbalance due to the GABAergic stimulation deficit in postsynaptic neurons. Methods We recruit a retrospective multicentric consecutive case series of AAE with anti-GAD65 antibodies from 5 epilepsy units in Spain who have received treatment with CNB. Results A total of 8 patients were recruited. This cohort of highly refractory patients have failed a mean of 9.50 (SD = 3.20) ASM without control of seizures for sustained periods of time. The average number of seizures per month during the previous 3 months before CNB treatment was 19.63 (SD = 17.03). After the introduction of CNB improvement was achieved in all our patients, with a median reduction in the number of seizures of 92.22% (interquartile range [IQR]: 57.25–98.75). The mean follow-up was 156.75 days (SD = 68.23). In patients with concomitant treatment with clobazam (CLB), the median percentage of seizure reduction was higher than those not taking CLB: 94.72% (IQR: 87.25–100) vs 41.50% (p = 0.044) and also higher than the control group of patients with refractory epilepsy not related to anti-GAD65 treated with the same combination: 94.72% (IQR: 87.25–100) vs 45.00% (IQR: 25.00–87.00) (p = 0.019). Discussion Treatment with the combination CNB + CLB could be a type of personalized medicine in patients with AAE with anti-GAD65. Our preliminary data will need to be endorsed with new prospective and controlled studies.

Immunologic and neuroinflammatory pathways have been found to play a major role in the pathogenesis of many neurological disorders such as epilepsy, proposing the use of novel therapeutic strategies. In the era of personalized medicine and in the face of the exhaustion of anti-seizure therapeutic resources, it is worth looking at the current or future possibilities that neuroimmunomodulator or anti-inflammatory therapy can offer us in the management of patients with epilepsy. For this reason, we performed a narrative review on the recent advances on the basic epileptogenic mechanisms related to the activation of immunity or neuroinflammation with special attention to current and future opportunities for novel treatments in epilepsy. Neuroinflammation can be considered a universal phenomenon and occurs in structural, infectious, post-traumatic, autoimmune, or even genetically based epilepsies. The emerging research developed in recent years has allowed us to identify the main molecular pathways involved in these processes. These molecular pathways could constitute future therapeutic targets for epilepsy. Different drugs current or in development have demonstrated their capacity to inhibit or modulate molecular pathways involved in the immunologic or neuroinflammatory mechanisms described in epilepsy. Some of them should be tested in the future as possible antiepileptic drugs.

Background: There is growing evidence that neuroinflammation is involved in epileptogenesis. Identifying its biomarkers can be important for distinguishing epilepsy patients from healthy individuals and differentiating well-controlled epilepsy from drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Methods: An observational case-control study at Malaga’s Regional University Hospital involved epilepsy patients divided into three groups: healthy controls (HC), seizure-free epilepsy (SFE), and DRE. Demographic and clinical data and plasmatic and/or CSF levels of 24 different inflammation-related molecules were collected for each patient and were analyzed through univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The study included 68 patients: 38 in the DRE group, 14 in the SFE group, and 16 in the HC group. A new Inflammatory Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Index (IDREI) was created using key variables with significant or trending significance. This index combined pro-inflammatory mediators (ICAM-1 and NfL) and anti-inflammatory factors (IL-10 and IL-4), showing statistical significance (p = 0.002). ROC curve analysis for the IDREI gave an AUC of 0.731 (95% CI: 0.608–0.854). A multivariate logistic regression model’s ROC analysis resulted in a higher AUC of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.791–0.991). Conclusions: The IDREI molecular index shows promise in predicting epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Additional prospective studies are required to assess its clinical utility.

Background: Neuroinflammation contributes to epileptogenesis across the different etiological categories of epilepsy. Identifying its biomarkers can be important for dis-tinguishing epilepsy patients from healthy individuals and differentiating well-controlled epilepsy from Drug Resistant Epilepsy (DRE). Methods: An observational case-control study at Malaga’s Regional University Hospital involved epilepsy patients, divided into three groups: Healthy controls (HC), Sei-zure-Free Epilepsy (SFE) and DRE. Demographic and clinical data and plasmatic and/or CSF level of 24 different inflammation-related molecules were collected for each patient and were analysed through a univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The study included 68 patients: 38 in the DRE group, 14 in the SFE group, and 16 in the HC group. A new Inflammatory Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Index (IDREI) was created using key variables with significant or trending significance. This index com-bined pro-inflammatory mediators (ICAM-1 and NfL) and anti-inflammatory factors (IL-10 and IL-4), showing statistical significance (p=0.002). ROC curve analysis for the IDREI gave an AUC of 0.731 (95% CI: 0.608−0.854). A multivariate logistic regression model's ROC anaysis resulted in a higher AUC of 0.891 (95% CI: 0.791−0.991). Conclusions: IDREI is a molecular index that effectively predicts epilepsy and DRE. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate its clinical utility.

Background: Immunologic and neuro-inflammatory pathways have been found to play a major role in the pathogenesis of many neurological disorders such as epilepsy, proposing the use of novel therapeutic strategies. In the era of personalized medicine and in the face of the exhaustion of anti-seizure therapeutic resources it is worth looking at the current or future possibilities that neuroimmunomodulator or anti-inflammatory therapy can offer us in the management of patients with epilepsy. Methods: We performed a narrative review on the recent advances on the basic epileptogenic mechanisms related to the activation of immunity or neuroinflammation with special attention to current and future opportunities for novel treatments in epilepsy. Results: Neuroinflammation can be considered a universal phenomenon and occurs in structural, infectious, post-traumatic, autoimmune, or even genetically based epilepsies. The emerging research developed in recent years has allowed us to identify the main molecular pathways in-volved in these processes. These molecular pathways could constitute future therapeutic targets for epilepsy. Conclusions: Different drugs current or in development have demonstrated their capacity to inhibit or modulate molecular pathways involved in the immunologic or neuroinflammatory mechanisms described in epilepsy. Some of them should be tested in the future as possible antiepileptic drugs.