Jennifer Svaldi

Prof. Dr. Jennifer Svaldi


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2019 in Journal of Psychiatric Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJennifer Svaldi
Jennifer Svaldi
DWDustin Werle
Dustin Werle
ENEva Naumann
Eva Naumann
EEEva Eichler
Eva Eichler
MBMatthias Berking
Matthias Berking

1 September 2015 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJennifer Svaldi
Jennifer Svaldi
BTBrunna Tuschen-Caffier
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
SBStefanie C. Biehl
Stefanie C. Biehl
KGKathrin Gschwendtner
Kathrin Gschwendtner
IWInes Wolz
Ines Wolz
ENEva Naumann
Eva Naumann

17 October 2023 in Psychological Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BKBarbara Kaup
Barbara Kaup
RURolf Ulrich
Rolf Ulrich
KBKarin M. Bausenhart
Karin M. Bausenhart
DBDonna Bryce
Donna Bryce
MBMartin V. Butz
Martin V. Butz
HWHong Yu Wong
Hong Yu Wong
Accounting for how the human mind represents the internal and external world is a crucial feature of many theories of human cognition. Central to this question is the distinction between modal as opposed to amodal representational formats. It has often been assumed that one but not both of these two types of representations underlie processing in specific domains of cognition (e.g., perception, mental imagery, and language). However, in this paper, we suggest that both formats play a major role in most cognitive domains. We believe that a comprehensive theory of cognition requires a solid understanding of these representational formats and their functional roles within and across different domains of cognition, the developmental trajectory of these representational formats, and their role in dysfunctional behavior. Here we sketch such an overarching perspective that brings together research from diverse subdisciplines of psychology on modal and amodal representational formats so as to unravel their functional principles and their interactions.

1 November 2016 in Journal of Psychiatric Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ENEva Naumann
Eva Naumann
BTBrunna Tuschen-Caffier
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
UVUlrich Voderholzer
Ulrich Voderholzer
JSJohanna Schäfer
Johanna Schäfer
JSJennifer Svaldi
Jennifer Svaldi

28 April 2016 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJennifer Svaldi
Jennifer Svaldi
CBCaroline Bender
Caroline Bender
DCDetlef Caffier
Detlef Caffier
VIViliana Ivanova
Viliana Ivanova
NMNina Mies
Nina Mies
BTBrunna Tuschen-Caffier
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
Previous research has yielded evidence of increased attentional processing of negatively valenced body parts in women with anorexia nervosa (AN), especially for those with high depressive symptomatology. The present study extended previous research by implementing an experimental mood manipulation. In a within-subjects design, female adolescents with AN (n = 12) and an age matched female control group (CG; n = 12) were given a negative and a positive mood induction at a one-week interval. After each mood induction, participants underwent a 3-min mirror exposure, while their eye movements were recorded. After the positive mood induction, both AN and CG participants displayed longer and more frequent gazes towards their self-defined most ugly relative to their self-defined most beautiful body part. However, after the negative mood induction, only females with AN were characterized by increased attention to their most ugly compared to their most beautiful body part, while CG participants’ attention distribution was balanced. Furthermore, in the negative (but not in the positive) mood induction condition gaze frequency and duration towards the most ugly body part was significantly stronger in the AN group relative to the CG. The results emphasize the role of negative mood in the maintenance of pathological information processing of the self-body. This increased body-related negativity-bias during negative mood may lead to the persistence and aggravation of AN patients’ body image disturbance.

22 July 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJennifer Svaldi
Jennifer Svaldi
ENEva Naumann
Eva Naumann
SBStefanie Biehl
Stefanie Biehl
FSFlorian Schmitz
Florian Schmitz
Several studies report increased reward sensitivity towards food in overweight individuals. By contrast, data is inconclusive with respect to response inhibition in overweight individuals without binge eating disorder (BED). Hence, the latter was addressed in the present study in a group of overweight/obese females with and without BED and a normal-weight control group without eating disorders. A group of women with BED (n = 29), a group of overweight women without BED (n = 33) and normal-weight females (n = 30) participated in a pictorial priming paradigm, with food items (relevant primes) and office utensils (neutral primes) and color blobs (neutral primes) as stimuli. Increased response priming effects (i.e. priming with switches between stimulus categories) were taken as indicators of deficient behavioral inhibition. Priming effects for neutral primes were moderate and comparable across all groups. However, primes associated with the food task set lead to increased priming effects in both overweight groups. But, effects were comparable for overweight/obese participants with and without BED. Results suggest that early response inhibition in the context of food is impaired in overweight individuals compared to normal-weight individuals.