Andreas Schubert

Prof. Dr. Andreas Schubert

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2019 in Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JMJames Wamai Mwangi
James Wamai Mwangi
LNLinh T. Nguyen
Linh T. Nguyen
VBViet D. Bui
Viet D. Bui
TBThomas Berger
Thomas Berger
HZHenning Zeidler
Henning Zeidler
ASAndreas Schubert
Andreas Schubert

1 October 2012 in Precision Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMatthias Hackert-Oschätzchen
Matthias Hackert-Oschätzchen
GMGunnar Meichsner
Gunnar Meichsner
MZMike Zinecker
Mike Zinecker
AMAndré Martin
André Martin
ASAndreas Schubert
Andreas Schubert

1 January 2016 in Procedia CIRP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KNKlaus Nestler
Klaus Nestler
FBFalko Böttger-Hiller
Falko Böttger-Hiller
WAWolfgang Adamitzki
Wolfgang Adamitzki
GGGunther Glowa
Gunther Glowa
HZHenning Zeidler
Henning Zeidler
ASAndreas Schubert
Andreas Schubert

1 September 2015 in Journal of Materials Processing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMatthias Hackert-Oschätzchen
Matthias Hackert-Oschätzchen
RPRaphael Paul
Raphael Paul
AMAndré Martin
André Martin
GMGunnar Meichsner
Gunnar Meichsner
NLNorbert Lehnert
Norbert Lehnert
ASAndreas Schubert
Andreas Schubert

1 January 2016 in Procedia CIRP
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HZHenning Zeidler
Henning Zeidler
FBFalko Boettger-Hiller
Falko Boettger-Hiller
JEJan Edelmann
Jan Edelmann
ASAndreas Schubert
Andreas Schubert
Biomanufactured parts, for implant or generally in-vivo use, have high requirements for surface properties. Depending on their field of application, not only smooth, but also well-defined surfaces, i.e. roughness parameters, must be set to allow for the respective functionalities such as optimal cell growth or minimal friction and wear. While for many parts mechanical polishing procedures are state-of-the-art, which are time-consuming and limited in their flexibility, established electrolytic polishing processes often incorporate aggressive media such as acids. Plasma electrolytic Polishing (PeP), a high-voltage process combining anode dissolution and plasma-chemical processes, can be considered a suitable alternative. The paper focusses on current investigations of PeP and shows application scenarios, also pointing out necessary development directions to introduce PeP to industrial biomanufacturing process chains

26 March 2019 in Micromachines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IDIgor Danilov
Igor Danilov
MHMatthias Hackert-Oschätzchen
Matthias Hackert-Oschätzchen
MZMike Zinecker
Mike Zinecker
GMGunnar Meichsner
Gunnar Meichsner
JEJan Edelmann
Jan Edelmann
ASAndreas Schubert
Andreas Schubert
Currently, the demand for surface treatment methods like plasma electrolytic polishing (PeP)—a special case of electrochemical machining—is increasing. This paper provides a literature review on the fundamental mechanisms of the plasma electrolytic polishing process and discusses simulated and experimental results. The simulation shows and describes a modelling approach of the polishing effect during the PeP process. Based on the simulation results, it can be assumed that PeP can be simulated as an electrochemical machining process and that the simulation can be used for roughness and processing time predictions. The simulation results exhibit correlations with the experimentally-achieved approximation for roughness decrease. The experimental part demonstrates the results of the PeP processing for different times. The results for different types of roughness show that roughness decreases exponentially. Additionally, a current efficiency calculation was made. Based on the experimental results, it can be assumed that PeP is a special electrochemical machining process with low passivation.