Donald Allen Davis

Prof. Dr. Donald Allen Davis

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 July 2013 in Aquaculture Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSD. Sookying
D. Sookying
DDDonald Allen Davis
Donald Allen Davis
FSF. Soller Dias da Silva
F. Soller Dias da Silva

1 January 2019 in Fish & Shellfish Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRSamad Rahimnejad
Samad Rahimnejad
KLKangle Lu
Kangle Lu
LWLing Wang
Ling Wang
KSKai Song
Kai Song
KMKangsen Mai
Kangsen Mai
CZChunxiao Zhang
Chunxiao Zhang

27 October 2016 in Journal of the World Aquaculture Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASamuel Addo
Samuel Addo
ACAbel A. Carrias
Abel A. Carrias
MWMalachi A. Williams
Malachi A. Williams
MLMark R. Liles
Mark R. Liles
JTJeffery S. Terhune
Jeffery S. Terhune
DDDonald Allen Davis
Donald Allen Davis

9 December 2022 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
UPUthpala Padeniya
Uthpala Padeniya
DDDonald Allen Davis
Donald Allen Davis
DWDaniel E. Wells
Daniel E. Wells
Timothy J BruceTimothy J Bruce
Timothy J Bruce
Biofloc technology involves the manipulation of the culture system’s carbon: nitrogen ratio to promote bacterial community growth to convert toxic nitrogenous wastes and organics into functional microbial protein; this protein can then be used as a food source and mediate water quality. Biofloc systems have several advantages, which include improved biosecurity, feed conversion, water use efficiency, and nutrient processing. Analyzing the nutritional value and the relationship between high production of aquacultural practices using biofloc is essential. Many studies have demonstrated that biofloc increases the growth of aquatic species by acting as a food source or providing bioactive compounds. Other than this, the beneficial micro-organisms in biofloc systems contain compounds such as organic acids that could resist the growth of pathogenic microbes. They will also serve as a natural probiotic and increase the immunity and survival of fish and shrimp. This technology could be useful for further integration within many aspects of aquaculture production when microbial interactions are considered. However, future studies must fully understand the principles and mechanisms behind the benefits of interactions between biofloc and cultured fish and crustacean species.

28 February 2017 in Aquaculture Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SASamuel Addo
Samuel Addo
ACAbel A Carrias
Abel A Carrias
MWMalachi A Williams
Malachi A Williams
MLMark R Liles
Mark R Liles
JTJeffery S Terhune
Jeffery S Terhune
DDDonald Allen Davis
Donald Allen Davis
This study was conducted to evaluate the individual and combined effects of long-term feeding of diets containing two probiotic Bacillus subtilis group strains (Aqua NZ and AP193) and the prebiotic Previda®, a commercial hemicellulose extract, on growth performance, immune parameters and Aeromonas hydrophila susceptibility of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Nile tilapia of average weight 7.47 ± 0.11 g were fed diets formulated with the probiotics and/or the prebiotic, or a control diet for 8 weeks and, subsequently, challenged with A. hydrophila by intragastric gavage at a dosage of 3.9 × 107 CFU per fish. Fish attained a mean weight of 59.5 ± 0.99 g at the end of the growth period. Under the conditions of the present trial, none of the diets significantly improved mean per cent weight gain (P = 0.70), thermal growth coefficient (P = 0.88) or feed conversion ratio (P = 0.87) of Nile tilapia. Except for the diet containing the prebiotic Previda® only (P = 0.17), all other diets resulted in significantly higher fish survival compared to the control (P < 0.05). The combined effect of the prebiotic and probiotic strains emerged as the most important diet with respect to mortality reduction. The mean lysozyme and respiratory burst activities did not show any significant differences between treatments and control (P = 0.14 and 0.32, respectively). Thus, these probiotic strains used in this study have the potential to prevent disease due to A. hydrophila in O. niloticus.

30 October 2017 in Aquaculture Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Romi NovriadiRomi Novriadi
Romi Novriadi
MRM. Rhodes
M. Rhodes
MPM. Powell
M. Powell
THT. Hanson
T. Hanson
DDDonald Allen Davis
Donald Allen Davis