Aims: To evaluate the frequency of diabetes and admission hyperglycaemia in Mexican COVID‐19 patients, to describe the clinical and biochemical characteristics of patients with admission hyperglycaemia and to determinate the impact of diabetes and admission hyperglycaemia on COVID‐19 severity and mortality.Methods: A multicentric study was performed in 480 hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. Clinical and biochemical characteristics were evaluated in patients with admission hyperglycaemia and compared with non‐hyperglycaemic patients. The effect of diabetes and admission hyperglycaemia on severity and risk of death were evaluated.Results: Age was 50.7 ± 13.6 years; 68.3% were male. Some 48.5% (n = 233) had admission hyperglycaemia; 29% (n = 139) of these patients had pre‐existing diabetes. Patients with admission hyperglycaemia had more requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), higher levels of urea, D‐dimer and neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as well as lower lymphocyte count. An association between admission hyperglycaemia with IMV and D‐dimer with glucose was found. Age ≥50 years (OR 2.09; 95%CI 1.37–3.17), pre‐existing diabetes (OR 2.38; 95%CI 1.59–5.04) and admission hyperglycaemia (OR 8.24; 95%CI 4.74–14.32) were risk factors for mortality.Conclusions: Admission hyperglycaemia is presented in 48.5% of COVID‐19 patients. Diabetes and admission hyperglycaemia are associated with the severity of disease and mortality. This study shows the devastating conjunction of hyperglycaemia and COVID‐19.Clinical trial registration: Clinical characteristics of patients with COVID‐19, DI/20/204/04/41 (Hospital General de Mexico) and NR‐13‐2020 (Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad Ixtapaluca).

The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical features, severity, and mortality of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) in hospitalized middle-aged and older women, and the risk factors associat...

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global public health issue, particularly in developing countries. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are at elevated risk for TB due to immunosuppression. This retrospective study (2005-2022) assessed a preemptive latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening and treatment strategy in 338 HSCT recipients and their donors. Screening included tuberculin skin test (TST) or QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT), and pulmonary imaging, with positive cases receiving isoniazid (INH) therapy. Statistical analyses aimed to compare TB reactivation rates, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) across HSCT groups. Of 338 patients, 92 (27%) were diagnosed with LTBI. Screening involved TST in 325 cases and QFT in 13. INH therapy was completed by 81 patients, with 5 discontinuing due to hepatotoxicity. The cumulative incidence of active TB was 0.6%, and LTBI reactivation rate in patients who received INH was 1.2%. LTBI status did not affect OS or RFS. Our study exemplifies the effectiveness of LTBI protocols incorporating TST/QFT and CT-scan testing, followed by INH therapy, in reducing TB reactivation among HSCT recipients in a high-burden region.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a global public health issue, particularly in developing countries. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are at increased risk for TB due to immunosuppression. This retrospective study (2005-2022) assessed a preemptive latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening and treatment strategy in 338 HSCT recipients and their donors. Screening included tuberculin skin test (TST) or QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT), and pulmonary imaging, with positive cases receiving isoniazid (INH) therapy before HSCT. Statistical analyses compared TB reactivation rates, overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) across HSCT groups. Of 338 patients, screening involved TST in 325 and QFT in 13 cases, resulting in 94 (27.8%) patients with LTBI. INH therapy was completed by 83 patients, with 5 discontinuing due to hepatotoxicity. The cumulative incidence of active TB was 0.6%, and one patient who received INH prophylaxis developed LTBI reactivation. LTBI status did not affect OS or RFS. Our study demonstrates that the use of LTBI protocols incorporating TST/QFT and chest CT-scans, followed by INH in positive cases, was safe and is an accessible option among HSCT recipients in high-burden regions.