Jennifer L Leight

Dr. Jennifer L Leight

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2012 in Molecular Biology of the Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJennifer L Leight
Jennifer L Leight
MWMichele A. Wozniak
Michele A. Wozniak
SCSophia Chen
Sophia Chen
MLMichelle L. Lynch
Michelle L. Lynch
CCChristopher S. Chen
Christopher S. Chen
The transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling pathway is often misregulated during cancer progression. In early stages of tumorigenesis, TGF-β acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting proliferation and inducing apoptosis. However, as the disease progresses, TGF-β switches to promote tumorigenic cell functions, such as epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and increased cell motility. Dramatic changes in the cellular microenvironment are also correlated with tumor progression, including an increase in tissue stiffness. However, it is unknown whether these changes in tissue stiffness can regulate the effects of TGF-β. To this end, we examined normal murine mammary gland cells and Madin–Darby canine kidney epithelial cells cultured on polyacrylamide gels with varying rigidity and treated with TGF-β1. Varying matrix rigidity switched the functional response to TGF-β1. Decreasing rigidity increased TGF-β1–induced apoptosis, whereas increasing rigidity resulted in EMT. Matrix rigidity did not change Smad signaling, but instead regulated the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Direct genetic and pharmacologic manipulations further demonstrated a role for PI3K/Akt signaling in the apoptotic and EMT responses. These findings demonstrate that matrix rigidity regulates a previously undescribed switch in TGF-β–induced cell functions and provide insight into how changes in tissue mechanics during disease might contribute to the cellular response to TGF-β.

24 December 2006 in Nature Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PJPaul Janmey
Paul Janmey
MMMargaret E. McCormick
Margaret E. McCormick
SRSebastian Rammensee
Sebastian Rammensee
JLJennifer L Leight
Jennifer L Leight
PGPenelope C. Georges
Penelope C. Georges
FMFred C. MacKintosh
Fred C. MacKintosh

21 January 2015 in Advanced Healthcare Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBalaji V. Sridhar
Balaji V. Sridhar
JBJohn L. Brock
John L. Brock
JSJason S. Silver
Jason S. Silver
JLJennifer L Leight
Jennifer L Leight
MRMark A. Randolph
Mark A. Randolph
KAKristi S. Anseth
Kristi S. Anseth

6 March 2017 in Annual Review of Cancer Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJennifer L Leight
Jennifer L Leight
ADAllison P. Drain
Allison P. Drain
VWValerie M Weaver
Valerie M Weaver
Solid tumors are characterized by a remodeled and stiffened extracellular matrix. The extracellular matrix is not a passive by-product of the tumor, but actively compromises tissue-specific differentiation, enhances tumor cell proliferation and survival, and fosters tumor cell invasion and migration. The tumor extracellular matrix also influences the behavior of the stromal cells, which through vicious, feedforward-reinforcing pathways promote tumor progression and compromise treatment efficacy. To investigate how the tumor extracellular matrix alters cancer phenotype and treatment, a number of three-dimensional, organotypic culture models have been developed that employ a variety of materials, including natural matrices, collagen, fibrin, and reconstituted basement membrane gels, as well as synthetic hydrogel materials such as polyacrylamide and polyethylene glycol. These models have been used to interrogate how specific microenvironmental features modify tumor and stromal cell function and to identify the molecular mechanisms that regulate tumorigenesis and therapeutic efficacy. To translate these findings into more effective treatment strategies for patients, clinically informed studies are needed that incorporate computational modeling and in vivo validation.

15 July 2009 in Molecular Biology of the Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SGScott Gehler
Scott Gehler
MBMassimiliano Baldassarre
Massimiliano Baldassarre
YLYatish Lad
Yatish Lad
JLJennifer L Leight
Jennifer L Leight
MWMichele A. Wozniak
Michele A. Wozniak
PKPatricia J. Keely
Patricia J. Keely
The physical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) regulate the behavior of several cell types; yet, mechanisms by which cells recognize and respond to changes in these properties are not clear. For example, breast epithelial cells undergo ductal morphogenesis only when cultured in a compliant collagen matrix, but not when the tension of the matrix is increased by loading collagen gels or by increasing collagen density. We report that the actin-binding protein filamin A (FLNa) is necessary for cells to contract collagen gels, and pull on collagen fibrils, which leads to collagen remodeling and morphogenesis in compliant, low-density gels. In stiffer, high-density gels, cells are not able to contract and remodel the matrix, and morphogenesis does not occur. However, increased FLNa-β1 integrin interactions rescue gel contraction and remodeling in high-density gels, resulting in branching morphogenesis. These results suggest morphogenesis can be “tuned” by the balance between cell-generated contractility and opposing matrix stiffness. Our findings support a role for FLNa-β1 integrin as a mechanosensitive complex that bidirectionally senses the tension of the matrix and, in turn, regulates cellular contractility and response to this matrix tension.

1 January 2007
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
KJKandice R. Johnson
Kandice R. Johnson
JLJennifer L Leight
Jennifer L Leight
VWValerie M Weaver
Valerie M Weaver