This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the factors in dentists’ opinions related to oral health and the treatment management of the elderly. An online questionnaire-based survey was conducted among the dentist population (n = 463). Respondents were divided depending on whether they attended the geriatric dentistry course during their education, and 15 questions on the Likert scale demonstrated the difference in their attitudes. The majority of respondents (61.9%) agree that dental studies should pay more attention to acquiring sufficient knowledge and skills in the treatment of the elderly, and 56.2% would like to attend a course on that subject. Compared to those who participated in the geriatric dentistry course, those who did not consider providing oral healthcare to older people find it more difficult because of its complexity and practical obstacles (37.3% vs. 54%, p ≤ 0.001). From the results of this study, it can be concluded that there are differences in opinion about the provision of oral healthcare to the elderly between dentists who have and who have not attended a geriatric dentist course during their education. During the dentist’s education, geriatric dentistry courses should have a significant role in providing knowledge for working with the elderly population.

Background: The safety of oral hygiene products is a growing concern, particularly regarding the toxicity of specific ingredients used in their formulations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of dentists, physicians, pharmacists, and the general public regarding ingredients in oral hygiene products, especially fluoride. Additionally, this study aimed to identify which ingredients may exhibit potential toxicity based on historical records of any adverse effects being induced by a material/component. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was used in an online cross-sectional observational study to collect data on sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of fluoride in dental medicine, fluoride usage practices in oral hygiene products, opinions on ingredient toxicity in oral hygiene products, and personal experiences of adverse reactions to products and their components. The collected data underwent descriptive and regression analyses to reveal patterns and relationships within the dataset. Results: The study found a moderate overall knowledge level regarding fluoride usage in dentistry among participants (Md = 5.00, IQR 2.50–7.00). Healthcare professionals exhibited significantly higher knowledge scores compared to the general population (p ≤ 0.001), with dental professionals displaying the highest scores. Regarding concerns about the usage of fluoride, the majority of respondents (77.0%) did not express any concerns. Minor concerns included the risk of ingestion (6.0%) and dental fluorosis (4.6%). Among the other ingredients in oral hygiene products, respondents named alcohol as the most toxic ingredient (70.3%), followed by artificial colors (53.1%), artificial sweeteners (50.4%), and parabens (50.1%). It is noteworthy that the majority of participants (61.6%) stated that they had never experienced any side effects associated with the use of oral hygiene products. Conclusion: This study underscores disparities in fluoride knowledge between healthcare professionals and the general population in Croatia, with dental experts exhibiting a superior understanding. Despite lingering misconceptions about fluoride content and potential toxicity, the majority of participants acknowledge its oral health benefits and use fluoride products regularly.

This study investigated whether toothpastes containing different fluoride compounds influence cytotoxic and genotoxic alterations in buccal mucosal cells, with particular attention to the type of fluoride, the presence of fluoride itself, and the duration of exposure. Eighty-eight participants were randomly assigned to four parallel groups: a control group using fluoride-free toothpaste and three intervention groups using formulations containing sodium fluoride, sodium monofluorophosphate, or amine fluoride. Buccal cell samples were obtained at baseline (T0), after 30 days (T1), and after 45 days (T2), and evaluated using the buccal micronucleus cytome assay to quantify nuclear abnormalities and cytotoxic markers. All fluoride-containing toothpastes led to higher frequencies of micronuclei, nuclear buds, and “broken egg” cells at T1 and T2 compared with the control group (P ≤ 0.001). Amine fluoride and sodium monofluorophosphate produced sustained increases in cytogenetic markers, including nuclear buds (AmF: P = 0.013; NaMFP: P ≤ 0.001) and “broken egg“ cells (AmF: P ≤ 0.001; NaMFP: P = 0.004), while sodium fluoride demonstrated a slower, progressive increase in “broken egg“ cells (P = 0.036). The findings suggest that fluoride-based toothpastes may modulate cytogenetic responses in buccal epithelial cells, and that these effects differ according to the fluoride compound and exposure duration. The findings should be interpreted with caution due to study limitations, and further research is needed to clarify the long-term biological consequences of repeated fluoride exposure in oral hygiene.